怎麼辦？美國總統遭遇了一個哈姆雷特王子式的問題！

By Archer Hong Qian

看看這張集合圖，川普因“慕尼黑安全會”上萬斯刺激歐洲自強的發聲，以及《烏美礦產協議》促和思路引發各種糾葛，惹的身為盟友卻一面正義凜然大會小會支持烏克蘭，一面繼續給俄羅斯輸血的歐洲，罵成了篩子。

這的確是這個時代的，川普遭遇的一個哈姆雷特式的問題！

怎麼辦？從這個問題出發，川普總統除了願意被澤連斯基綁定同時對美國選民有個交待，簽下《烏美礦產協議》之外，更應該與歐洲盟友簽一個既解決盟友能源剛需，有起到對俄烏戰爭釜底抽薪作用的《歐美石化協議》，全面開放石油天然氣生產供應，還能解決大量就業，平抑貿易逆差，獲得數千億美元收入，這大筆錢，可以對內投資新興產業，對外援助烏克蘭、以色列和印太地區⋯⋯川普的MAGA運動就全盤皆活遊刃有餘了！

總之，川普的MAGA運動在當前局勢中的核心挑戰，是如何在確保美國利益與全球責任之間取得動態平衡。

面對歐洲在俄烏戰爭中的矛盾行為，川普通過《烏美礦產協議》為美國和烏克蘭建立實質性利益聯繫，但要真正釜底抽薪，結束俄烏戰爭，實現公正而持久和平，還需與歐洲簽訂《歐美石化協議》，開放石油天然氣生產供應。這不僅緩解歐洲對俄能源依賴，還能促進美國就業、平衡貿易逆差、關稅大棒適可而止，並為國內建設與全球安全援助提供充足資金，從而實現MAGA戰略的全面活躍與有效推進。

2025.3.8夜Vancouver

What to do? The President of the United States is facing a Hamlet-like dilemma!

Look at this visual representation — Trump, due to J.D. Vance’s call for European self-reliance at the Munich Security Conference and the US-Ukraine Mineral Agreement’s peace-promoting approach, has triggered various entanglements. This has led Europe — while grandly supporting Ukraine in public — to continue financially supporting Russia, drawing heavy criticism despite being allies.

This is indeed a Hamlet-like question of our time, one Trump must face!

The President of the United States is facing a Hamlet-like dilemma, torn between profound internal conflicts, difficult decisions, and moral choices.

• "To be or not to be?" – Perhaps the president is facing a life-or-death political crisis, such as war, economic collapse, or the threat of impeachment.

• The dilemma of revenge and justice – Maybe the president must decide whether to take harsh action against a country, individual, or political party but fears the consequences could backfire.

• "Overthinking leads to inaction" – Just as Hamlet delays action due to excessive contemplation, is the president also paralyzed by overanalyzing the situation?

• Betrayal and conspiracy among allies – If the president has been deceived by advisors, party members, or international allies, he could be trapped in a Hamlet-like tragedy.

What to do? Beyond being tied to Zelensky and addressing American voters by signing the US-Ukraine Mineral Agreement, Trump should also sign a US-Europe Petrochemical Agreement. This would address Europe’s energy needs, cut off Russia’s funding for the war, open US oil and gas production, create jobs, reduce trade deficits, and generate billions in revenue. These funds could fuel domestic emerging industries and support Ukraine, Israel, and the Indo-Pacific — making Trump’s MAGA movement far more effective and adaptable.

Ultimately, the core challenge for Trump’s MAGA movement in the current situation is how to strike a dynamic balance between safeguarding US interests and fulfilling global responsibilities.

Faced with Europe’s contradictory behavior in the Russia-Ukraine war, Trump’s US-Ukraine Mineral Agreement creates substantial mutual interests between the US and Ukraine. But to truly end the war and achieve lasting peace, the US-Europe Petrochemical Agreement is needed. It would ease Europe’s dependence on Russian energy, boost US employment, balance trade deficits, and provide ample resources for domestic development and international aid — enabling the full and effective implementation of the MAGA strategy.

Archer Hong Qian
March 8, 2025, Vancouver