Subject: Bug#322457: coding this

From: Russell Coker <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 00:02:04 +1000

On Wednesday 27 June 2007 23:39, Jim Meyering <[email-masked]> wrote:
> It's probably going overboard, but some application might
> even want to call fsync on each containing directory.

I expect that the overhead of calling fsync on the directory is negligible 
compared to the overhead of calling it on the files.  So it might be best to 
just have a single option.