Debian Bug report logs - #594868
packages.debian.org: Broken handling of dependencies on virtual packages in lenny-bpo

Package: www.debian.org; Maintainer for www.debian.org is Debian WWW Team <[email protected]>;

Reported by: Axel Beckert <[email protected]>

Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:54:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Reply or subscribe to this bug.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to [email protected], [email protected], Debian WWW Team <[email protected]>:
Bug#594868; Package www.debian.org. (Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:54:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Axel Beckert <[email protected]>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to [email protected], Debian WWW Team <[email protected]>. (Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:54:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #5 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Axel Beckert <[email protected]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[email protected]>
Subject: packages.debian.org: Broken handling of dependencies on virtual packages in lenny-bpo
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:50:58 +0200
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

While resolving the dependency on xen-hypervisor-amd64 (a virtual
package provided by xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64) works fine in sid[1], it
doesn't resolve for lenny-bpo[2] despite xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64 from
Lenny[3] provides that[4].

  [1] http://packages.debian.org/en/sid/xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64
  [2] http://packages.debian.org/lenny-backports/xen-linux-system-2.6.32-bpo.4-xen-amd64
  [3] http://packages.debian.org/lenny/xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64
  [4] Provides: xen-hypervisor, xen-hypervisor-3, xen-hypervisor-3.2-1, xen-hypervisor-amd64

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (600, 'testing'), (500, 'oldstable'), (400, 'stable'), (110, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash




Information forwarded to [email protected], Debian WWW Team <[email protected]>:
Bug#594868; Package www.debian.org. (Mon, 03 Nov 2014 19:36:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Tomas Pospisek <[email protected]>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian WWW Team <[email protected]>. (Mon, 03 Nov 2014 19:36:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #10 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Tomas Pospisek <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Axel Beckert <[email protected]>
Subject: does this bug report still apply?
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 20:33:15 +0100 (CET)
Axel Beckert wrote:

> While resolving the dependency on xen-hypervisor-amd64 (a virtual
> package provided by xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64) works fine in sid[1], it
> doesn't resolve for lenny-bpo[2] despite xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64 from
> Lenny[3] provides that[4].
> 
> [1] http://packages.debian.org/en/sid/xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64
> [2] http://packages.debian.org/lenny-backports/xen-linux-system-2.6.32-bpo.4-xen-amd64
> [3] http://packages.debian.org/lenny/xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64
> [4] Provides: xen-hypervisor, xen-hypervisor-3, xen-hypervisor-3.2-1, xen-hypervisor-amd64

We do not have lenny-bpo's present on packages.debian.org. So does this 
bug report still apply? Can it be closed?
*t




Information forwarded to [email protected], Debian WWW Team <[email protected]>:
Bug#594868; Package www.debian.org. (Tue, 29 Mar 2016 23:57:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Frank Lichtenheld <[email protected]>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian WWW Team <[email protected]>. (Tue, 29 Mar 2016 23:57:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #15 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Frank Lichtenheld <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Still applies
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 01:52:40 +0200
This bug still applies.
A more recent example would be
https://packages.debian.org/jessie-backports/libapache2-mod-security2

It depends on apache2-api-20120211 which is provided in jessie, but
the page in jessie-backports doesn't reflect that.

-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[email protected]>



Information forwarded to [email protected], Debian WWW Team <[email protected]>:
Bug#594868; Package www.debian.org. (Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:03:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Frank Lichtenheld <[email protected]>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian WWW Team <[email protected]>. (Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:03:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #20 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Frank Lichtenheld <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Still applies
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:01:24 +0200
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 01:52:40 +0200 Frank Lichtenheld <[email protected]> wrote:
> This bug still applies.
> A more recent example would be
> https://packages.debian.org/jessie-backports/libapache2-mod-security2
>
> It depends on apache2-api-20120211 which is provided in jessie, but
> the page in jessie-backports doesn't reflect that.

I looked a bit further into this. It basically boils down to the
horrible function Packages::Search::read_entry_simple() which is much
too terse and too cryptic in its return value. It should be completely
reimplemented. Which is not that bad since it is only used in two
places in the code anyway.

Regards,
  Frank

-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[email protected]>



Information forwarded to [email protected], Debian WWW Team <[email protected]>:
Bug#594868; Package www.debian.org. (Wed, 22 Sep 2021 04:27:27 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to PT FINDORA INTERNUSA <[email protected]>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian WWW Team <[email protected]>. (Wed, 22 Sep 2021 04:27:27 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #25 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: PT FINDORA INTERNUSA <[email protected]>
To: me <[email protected]>
Subject: P.O 22/09/2021
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 21:11:41 -0700
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,

Good morning,

We have gone through your samples from a partner and Here is our  Order 
List. Please do bear in mind that we are very much in  need of this 
order, quote your competitive prices.

Kindly send the Order confirmation.

Your early reply will be much appreciated.

Best Regards,

Maryanah Erwin.

PT FINDORA INTERNUSA

Jln Pahlawan 66 Kec. Arjawinangun

45162 CIREBON West-Java INDONESIA

tel : +62 231 357334

fax: +62 231 357260

email: [email protected]
[P.O22.09.2021.cab (application/zip, attachment)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Debian bug tracking system administrator <[email protected]>. Last modified: Tue May 13 13:41:45 2025; Machine Name: buxtehude

Debian Bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.