Debian Bug report logs - #628285
RFP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool

Reply or subscribe to this bug.

Display info messages

Message #5 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Raphael Hertzog <[email protected]>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[email protected]>

Subject: RFP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool

Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 15:48:20 +0200

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : xul-ext-pencil
  Version         : 1.2
  Upstream Author : Nguyen Tien Dung <[email protected]>
* URL             : http://pencil.evolus.vn
* License         : GPL2+
  Programming Lang: Javascript / Xulrunner app
  Description     : The Sketching and GUI Prototyping addon for Firefox/Iceweasel

The Pencil Project's unique mission is to build a free and opensource tool for
making diagrams and GUI prototyping that everyone can use.

Top features:

    Built-in stencils for diagraming and prototyping
    Multi-page document with background page
    Inter-page linkings!
    On-screen text editing with rich-text supports
    Exporting to HTML, PNG, Openoffice.org document, Word document and PDF.
    Undo/redo supports
    Installing user-defined stencils and templates
    Standard drawing operations: aligning, z-ordering, scaling, rotating...
    Cross-platforms
    Adding external objects
    Personal Collection
    Clipart Browser
    Object snapping
    Sketchy Stencil
    And much more...

I discovered this software a few weeks ago and I would like to see it packaged
for Debian (but I don't want to do it myself).

It should probably be maintained under the umbrella of the pkg-mozext team:
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianMozExtTeam

Unfortunately the current version is not compatible with Firefox 4 yet.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
                      ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français)

Message #16 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Fabrizio Regalli <[email protected]>

To: Raphael Hertzog <[email protected]>

Cc: [email protected]

Subject: Re: RFP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool

Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 16:26:47 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi Raphael,


On Sat, 2011-05-28 at 15:48 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> * Package name    : xul-ext-pencil
>   Version         : 1.2
>   Upstream Author : Nguyen Tien Dung <[email protected]>
> * URL             : http://pencil.evolus.vn
> * License         : GPL2+
>   Programming Lang: Javascript / Xulrunner app
>   Description     : The Sketching and GUI Prototyping addon for Firefox/Iceweasel
> 

I will start working on the package, hoping to do a good job.

Cheers,
Fabrizio.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #21 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Fabrizio Regalli <[email protected]>

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: RFP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool

Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 21:29:24 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello,

an update on pencil activity: 
there are at least two files without copyright and license information.
(IO.js and Base64.js but seems also nsDragAndDrop.js)
Sometime ago I wrote to upstream asking for miss information but at the
moment I get no answered.
If this situation persists I think we can't redistribute it.

Cheers,
Fabrizio.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #26 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Paul van Tilburg <[email protected]>

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: RFP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool

Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 23:19:43 +0100

Hey,

Good catch!  I separately had started packaging it (the ITP somehow was
too far down on Google and I overlooked it) and hadn't noticed these
issues.  The packaging was so simple using mozilla-devscripts, not 
much time was wasted.

Concern your last comment, I have found that lots of upstream cannot be
bothered to document all the files they copy from other sources.
There is not a problem with that by definition, as long as it it
compatible with the GPL-2 license of the rest of the source, documented
in debian/copyright.

However, if I look at base64.js and the linked website, I see that the
license is CC-BY 2.0 UK.  This is not compatible with the GPL-2!

For io.js, the license is MPL... I guess that should be fine.

Lastly, nsDragAndDrop.js is part of Firefox it seems, should also
be fine.

Given that the author(s) state on the project web page that they are so
committed to keeping it completely GPL-2, it is weird that they are not
willing to respond to your concerns.  If you think that it would help if
someone else also asks about this, let me know, I will try.

Paul

-- 
Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux | email: [email protected]
jabber/gtalk: [email protected]        | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181

Message #31 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Fabrizio Regalli <[email protected]>

To: Paul van Tilburg <[email protected]>, [email protected]

Cc: pkg-mozext-maintainers <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: Bug#628285: RFP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool

Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:05:43 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hey Paul,

On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 23:19 +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> Good catch!  I separately had started packaging it (the ITP somehow was
> too far down on Google and I overlooked it) and hadn't noticed these
> issues.  The packaging was so simple using mozilla-devscripts, not 
> much time was wasted.

Not sure if you have already checked the package on git.
:-) http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-mozext/pencil.git;a=summary
Everything is fine except for the copyright issues I've reported before.

> Concern your last comment, I have found that lots of upstream cannot be
> bothered to document all the files they copy from other sources.
> There is not a problem with that by definition, as long as it it
> compatible with the GPL-2 license of the rest of the source, documented
> in debian/copyright.
> 
> However, if I look at base64.js and the linked website, I see that the
> license is CC-BY 2.0 UK.  This is not compatible with the GPL-2!
> For io.js, the license is MPL... I guess that should be fine.
> 
> Lastly, nsDragAndDrop.js is part of Firefox it seems, should also
> be fine.
> 
> Given that the author(s) state on the project web page that they are so
> committed to keeping it completely GPL-2, it is weird that they are not
> willing to respond to your concerns.  If you think that it would help if
> someone else also asks about this, let me know, I will try.

Feel free to do it.
I Cc'ed the pkg-mozext team also, so we can be all up-to-date on future
developments about copyright

Thank you for your interest in pencil!

Cheers,
Fabrizio.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #36 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Fabrizio Regalli <[email protected]>

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: RFP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool

Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:53:35 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Any progress here? I have no good news.
If this situation remains unchanged, I will close this bug soon.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #41 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Fabrizio Regalli <[email protected]>

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: ITP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool

Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:43:10 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

There's a license problem.
See previous messages.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #52 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]>

To: [email protected], [email protected]

Cc: Fabrizio Regalli <[email protected]>

Subject: ITP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool

Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:52:09 +0100

unarchive 628285
reopen 628285
thanks

Fabrizio,

  Where do you see a base64.js ?

Steps:

  svn checkout http://evoluspencil.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/
evoluspencil-read-only
  cd evoluspencil-read-only
  find . -name base64.js
  find . | grep base64
-> empty

Thanks,

Message #57 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Fabrizio Regalli <[email protected]>

To: Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]>, [email protected]

Cc: [email protected]

Subject: Re: Bug#628285: ITP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool

Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:13:30 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-mozext/pencil.git;a=summary

Take a look of content/Common/Base64.js file

(this is an old ITP, maybe in the meantime the source have changed and
perhaps the file was removed)

Thank you.
Fabrizio

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #62 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Fabrizio Regalli <[email protected]>

To: Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]>

Cc: 628285 <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: ITP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool

Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:36:44 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I did a quick check, and seems to be present also in new sources:

svn checkout http://evoluspencil.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ evoluspencil-read-only
cd evoluspencil-read-only
find . -iname base64*
./Source/Common/Base64.js

Thank you.
Fabrizio

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #67 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]>

To: Fabrizio Regalli <[email protected]>

Cc: 628285 <[email protected]>, Control bugs server <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: ITP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool

Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:23:44 +0100

forwarded 628285 https://code.google.com/p/evoluspencil/issues/detail?id=541
thanks

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Fabrizio Regalli <[email protected]> wrote:
> I did a quick check, and seems to be present also in new sources:
>
> svn checkout http://evoluspencil.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ evoluspencil-read-only
> cd evoluspencil-read-only
> find . -iname base64*
> ./Source/Common/Base64.js

Thanks !

Let's see what upstream thinks about this. I do not think it is that
hard to replace this base64 js implementation with another.

Message #74 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]>

To: [email protected]

Cc: [email protected]

Subject: xul-ext-pencil: changing back from ITP to RFP

Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:10:29 +0200

retitle 628285 RFP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool
noowner 628285
tag 628285 - pending
thanks

Hi,

A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging xul-ext-pencil. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
refrain from packaging the software.

This is an automatic email to change the status of xul-ext-pencil back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 15 months.

If you are still interested in packaging xul-ext-pencil, please send a mail to
<[email protected]> with:

 retitle 628285 ITP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool
 owner 628285 !
 thanks

It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
time, by mailing <[email protected]>.  If you need guidance on how to
package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
[email protected] mailing list.

Thank you for your interest in Debian,
-- 
Lucas, for the QA team <[email protected]>

Message #132 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "FedEx International Ground" <[email protected]>

To: <[email protected]>

Subject: Delivery Notification, ID 763392

Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:25:20 +0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello,
Your parcel has arrived at 25.11.2016. Courier was unable to deliver the parcel to you. Please, download Delivery Label attached to this email.
Mikaela Omtiveros - Area Manager FedEx , CA
Thanks and best regards.

[FedEx.doc (application/msword, attachment)]

Message #146 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: [email protected] (i-MSCP Web User)

To: [email protected]

Subject: Delivery Status Notification

Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:42:12 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Dear Customer,

Please check your package delivery details attached!

FedEx

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
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-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

[FedEx-Label-ID-WYX1IE71.zip (application/zip, attachment)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.