Debian Bug report logs - #991813
libsmi: New upstream version 0.5.0 available.

Package: src:libsmi; Maintainer for src:libsmi is Vincent Bernat <[email protected]>;

Reported by: Tobias Frost <[email protected]>

Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 12:06:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Full log

Message #40 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

Received: (at 991813) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2021 11:26:00 +0000
From [email protected] Mon Aug 09 11:26:00 2021
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
	(2018-09-13) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DIGITS_LETTERS,
	DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD,FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD,
	PGPSIGNATURE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,
	UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.2-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 68; hammy, 149; neutral, 77; spammy,
	1. spammytokens:0.933-+--receive hammytokens:0.000-+--sha512,
	0.000-+--SHA512, 0.000-+--alioth, 0.000-+--Alioth,
	0.000-+--UD:gappssmtp.com
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::633]:39804)
	by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	id 1mD3Pr-0006t4-FR
	for [email protected]; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 11:26:00 +0000
Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id go31so28311434ejc.6
        for <[email protected]>; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 04:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=dropbear-xyz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=openpgp:in-reply-to:references:from:mime-version:date:message-id
         :subject:to:cc;
        bh=X1nkWSsjmwYUAwcLxihzi5OOiGFQxpRzaFaAYbXZ1Ww=;
        b=VhTEpvOyinzpuOeF4F7sp/PLylUL5vL3Xwt0PGkIRA3KU7WBpf4oBlARG50jPuv+RZ
         Jije1+3d0T4gyqt3sPRyoVC67s5Rx6GTH2HmnP0A5T8TjvY5pKj72XWA5m/wEa3KPRTm
         jYSln9fNCDX0kfG1nZJDf8y/X8ntPCdlI2NvVm6VnQ3zq2RGgFpHLnHalGwod+d/6nzA
         fgFoxmsqjvYQugnrs6F3r3hopmQdYwzwE7H8Zna1vpyS3bw9ITxLfSJIQfzAMwn654nc
         XyyLX6jE9bKVXpck+UQUJpioglPfHUH1+R7MsZ+dDY+grd56ldvLYtRF2rBMi7/TilRt
         n3ew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:openpgp:in-reply-to:references:from:mime-version
         :date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=X1nkWSsjmwYUAwcLxihzi5OOiGFQxpRzaFaAYbXZ1Ww=;
        b=LM2DkzJfYfcddLdpoyZ2rBdbr6x7Hr4Z/8QGeyhEmip2YDAy1/WwrJCRB8TibdSztA
         o7aLmfEZIPABN3I69/CuHNtjiGKtZrtrJST8ZVFzf6SfZotiddd7j8o8vpeOPT/2qroB
         8h5L7nbJDF06mdSpaCcbzDO8VsGrlTyXJKcq3rdKUmnYiv9z/TvnN61q77YjcwzCO48p
         HswyyRU0kwlupeULqzYBWl6u+Y7tEOXwrWrPROq4oIwC+ioTdvc/TXudKO5gEdp6g1PO
         R+TB4KEl2+PZUjbMBRA7a4UpGJh23BjGzTXwlnnG6z1PBUYD9fpX4aFCtT/dcD1RQAW/
         QiWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530h3yZM6HuL2O/TLwO4yZdHOWvUjUI/BZwkU9l1ZEPUdAl3898d
	6r51mkxqHANNV1BPHQLbn+Kqg4keLVATvzZYfUbjRg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx1u9MYEhMcjMArYkNvRWr6t+he8Lsd0BpdPzz6S0fQBExGYCfnl75WsgaC0729Ar8hNjJVi46S9qbakjy0S1I=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fb03:: with SMTP id lz3mr22308883ejb.517.1628508356263;
 Mon, 09 Aug 2021 04:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 717284730244 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with
 HTTPREST; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 04:25:55 -0700
Openpgp: id=3938F96BDF50FEA5
In-Reply-To: <YQkCn/[email protected]>
References: <YQkCn/[email protected]>
From: Craig Small <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 04:25:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CALy8Cw7sxNUOTSXM8hRRYuXq_5Pq3DFTS-bcEwc2N1jpjCmw=A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] net-smnp packaging team also suitable for
 other snmp packages?
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="000000000000170fe605c91ea6f6"

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 2021-08-03 at 08:48, [email protected] wrote:

> Best of course would be that the packages would be team maintained,
> so I'm wondering if the net-snmp would be open to the idea to expand
their
> scope to handle also such packages.

Hi Tobi,
  I don't think there really is much of a team. Not sure what happened (my
working theory is they all finally understood how to read ASN.1 and went
mad in the process).
I think I'm all that's left as far as active maintainers. The email list
has 5 members.

However, I'm willing to help. There's probably some overlap in the strange
sort of bugs snmp can bring.
The other complexity is that net-snmp uses the old style type of team, see
https://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/MailingListContinuation .  Looking into it,
I really should move it to the new-style team maintainership (like how the
Python team works).
I don't think it would be a good idea to make a new package use an
old-style team.

I'm not sure of your timings, but I probably should actually start to move
net-snmp onto the new style team. It would have been nice to do this before
the freeze but we are here now.

 - Craig
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: FlowCrypt Email Encryption 8.1.3
Comment: Seamlessly send and receive encrypted email
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=ZrDE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[0x3938F96BDF50FEA5.asc (application/pgp-keys, attachment)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.

Debian bug tracking system administrator <[email protected]>. Last modified: Thu May 15 18:41:15 2025; Machine Name: bembo

Debian Bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.