What is a problem that we may solve it?

• Agassi, Joseph: 1964, ‘The nature of scientific problems and their roots in metaphysics’, in M. Bunge (ed.),The Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy, Free Press, New York, pp. 189–211. Reprinted in Agassi,Science in Flux, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1975, pp. 208–239.

  Google Scholar 

• Bantz, David: 1980, ‘The structure of discovery: Evolution of structural accounts of chemical bonding’, in Nickles (1980d), pp. 291–329.

• Belnap, Nuel, and Thomas Steel: 1976,The Logic of Questions and Answers, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.

  Google Scholar 

• Bohr, N., H. A. Kramers, and J. C. Slater: 1924, ‘The quantum theory of radiation’, reprinted in B. L. van der Waerden (ed.),Sources of Quantum Mechanics, Dover, New York, 1968, pp. 159–176.

  Google Scholar 

• Boyd, Richard: 1973, ‘Realism, underdetermination, and a causal theory of evidence’,Noûs 7, 1–12.

  Google Scholar 

• Bromberger, Sylain: 1966, ‘Why questions’, in R. G. Colodny (ed.),Mind and Cosmos, Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 86–111.

  Google Scholar 

• Brown, Harold: 1975, ‘Problem changes in science and philosophy’,Metaphilosophy 6, 177–192.

  Google Scholar 

• Bunge, Mario: 1967,Scientific Research I: The Search for System, Springer-Verlag, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Darden, Lindley: 1976, ‘Reasoning in scientific change: Charles Darwin, Hugo DeVries, and the discovery of segregation’,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 7 127–169.

  Google Scholar 

• Davidson, Donald: 1967, ‘Truth and meaning’,Synthese 7, 304–323.

  Google Scholar 

• Dreyfus, Hubert: 1972,What Computers Can't Do, Harper & Row, New York, 2nd ed., enlarged, 1979.

  Google Scholar 

• Finocchiaro, Maurice: 1980, ‘Scientific discoveries as growth of understanding: The case of Newton's gravitation’, in Nickles (1980c), pp. 235–256.

• Frankel, Henry: 1980, ‘The importance of anticipating problem solutions in theory choice’,Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 39, 57–68.

  Google Scholar 

• Glymour, Clark: 1980,Theory and Evidence, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.

  Google Scholar 

• Gutting, Gary: 1980, ‘Science as discovery’,Revue Internationale de Philosophie, forthcoming.

• Hamblin, C. L.: 1958, ‘Questions’,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 36, 159–168.

  Google Scholar 

• Hattiangadi, J. N.: 1978, ‘The structure of problems’,Philosophy of the Social Sciences 8, 345–365, and9, 49–71.

  Google Scholar 

• Hempel, Carl G.: 1965, ‘Aspects of scientific explanation’, inAspects of Scientific Explanation, Free Press, New York, pp. 331–496.

  Google Scholar 

• Klein, M. J.: 1962, ‘Max Planck and the beginnings of the quantum theory’,Archive for History of Exact Sciences 1, 459–479.

  Google Scholar 

• Klein, M. J.: 1966, ‘Thermodynamics and quanta in Planck's work’,Physics Today 19, 23–32.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuhn, Thomas: 1959, ‘The essential tension’, reprinted in Kuhn (1977), pp. 225–239.

• Kuhn, Thomas: 1962,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago. 2nd ed., enlarged, 1970.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuhn, Thomas: 1977,The Essential Tension, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuhn, Thomas: 1978,The Black-Body Problem and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894–1912, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

  Google Scholar 

• Lakatos, Imre: 1970, ‘Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.),Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

  Google Scholar 

• Laudan, Larry: 1977,Progress and Its Problems, Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.

  Google Scholar 

• Laudan, Larry: 1980, ‘A refutation of convergent realism’, forthcoming.

• Leplin, Jarrett: 1980, ‘The role of models in theory construction’, in Nicles (1980c), pp. 267–284.

• Lugg, Andrew: 1978, ‘Overdetermined problems in science’,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 9, 1–18.

  Google Scholar 

• Lugg, Andrew: 1979 ‘Laudan and the problem-solving approach to scientific progress and rationality’,Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9, 466–474.

  Google Scholar 

• Matson, Wallace: 1966, ‘Why isn't the mind-body problem ancient?’ in P. Feyerabend and G. Maxwell (eds.),Mind, Matter, and Method, Minnesota Univ. Press, Minneapolis, pp. 92–102.

  Google Scholar 

• McMullin, Ernan: 1976, ‘The fertility of theory and the unit for appraisal in science’, in R. S. Cohenet al. (eds.),Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 395–432.

  Google Scholar 

• Monk, Robert: 1980, ‘Productive reasoning and the structure of scientific research’, in Nickles (1980c), pp. 337–354.

• Nickles, Thomas: 1976, ‘Theory generalization, problem reduction, and the unity of science’, in R. S. Cohenet al. (eds.),PSA 1974, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 33–75.

  Google Scholar 

• Nickles, Thomas: 1978, ‘Scientific problems and constraints’, in P. Asquith and I. Hacking (eds.),PSA 1978, Philosophy of Science Assn., East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 134–148.

  Google Scholar 

• Nickles, Thomas: 1980a, ‘Scientific discovery and the future of philosophy of science’, in Nickles (1980c), pp. 1–59.

• Nickles, Thomas: 1980b, ‘Can scientific constraints be violated rationally?’, in Nickles (1980c), pp. 285–315.

• Nickles, Thomas (ed.): 1980c,Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality (Proceedings of the First Leonard Conference, Vol. I), D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

  Google Scholar 

• Nickles, Thomas (ed.): 1980d,Scientific Discovery: Case Studies (Proceedings of the First Leonard Conference, Vol. II), D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

  Google Scholar 

• Nickles, Thomas: 1980e, ‘Scientific problems: Three empiricist models’, in R. Gieri and P. Asquith (eds.),PSA 1980, Vol. 1, Philosophy of Science Assn., East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 3–19.

  Google Scholar 

• Nickles, Thomas: 1981, ‘Heuristic appraisal, discovery, and justification: Whither philosophy of science?’, forthcoming in the Pittsburgh Series in Philosophy of Science, L. Laudan (ed.).

• Polanyi, Michael: 1966,The Tacit Dimension, Doubleday, Garden City, New Jersey.

  Google Scholar 

• Popper, Karl: 1972,Objective Knowledge, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

  Google Scholar 

• Putnam, Hilary: 1971, ‘On the “corroboration of theories”’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.),The Philosophy of Karl R. Popper, Open Court, La Salle, Ill, pp. 221–240.

  Google Scholar 

• Putnam, Hilary: 1976, ‘What is “realism”?’Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 76, 177–194. See alsoMeaning and the Moral Sciences, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978, Ch. 4.

  Google Scholar 

• Reitman, Walter: 1964, ‘Heuristic decision procedures, open constraints, and the nature of ill defined problems’ in M. W. Shelly, II and G. L. Bryan (eds.),Human Judgments and Optimality, John Wiley, New York, pp. 282–314.

  Google Scholar 

• Reitman, Walter: 1965,Cognition and Thought, John Wiley, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Rorty, Richard: 1979,Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.

  Google Scholar 

• Shapere, Dudley: 1969, ‘Notes toward a post-positivistic interpretation of science’, in P. Achinstein and S. Barker (eds.),The Legacy of Logical Positivism, Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, pp. 115–160.

  Google Scholar 

• Shapere, Dudley: 1980, ‘The character of scientific change’, in Nickles (1980c), pp. 61–116.

• Simon, Herbert, Allen Newell, and J. C. Shaw (1962), ‘The processes of creative thinking,’ in Simon,Models of Thought, Yale, New Haven, 1979, pp. 144–180.

  Google Scholar 

• Simon, Herbert: 1976, ‘Discussion: TheMeno paradox’,Philosophy of Science 43, 147–151. Reprinted in Simon (1977), pp. 338–343.

  Google Scholar 

• Simon, Herbert: 1977,Models of Discovery and Other Topics in the Methods of Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

  Google Scholar 

• Suppe, Frederick: 1974, ‘The search for philosophical understanding of scientific theories’, in Suppe (ed.),The Structure of Scientific Theories, Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 3–241.

  Google Scholar 

• Tichý, Pavel: 1978, ‘Questions, answers, and logic’,American Philosophical Quarterly 15, 275–284.

  Google Scholar 

• Toulmin, Stephen: 1972,Human Understanding, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.

  Google Scholar 

• Wartofsky, Marx: 1980, ‘Scientific judgment: Creativity and discovery in scientific thought’, in Nickles (1980d), pp. 1–20.

Download references