Abstract
Female genital cosmetic surgery is becoming more and more widespread both in the field of plastic and gynaecological surgery. The increased demand for vulvar surgery is spurred by the belief that the vulva is abnormal in appearance. What is normal in terms of labial anatomy? Labia minora enlargement or hypertrophy remains a clinical diagnosis which is poorly defined as it could be considered a variation of the normal anatomy. Enlarged labia minora can cause functional, aesthetic and psychosocial problems. In reality, given the wide variety of vulvar morphology among people, it is a very subjective issue to define the “normal” vulva. The spread of nudity in the general media plays a major role in creating an artificial image and standards with regard to the ideal form. Physicians should be aware that the patient’s self-perception of the normal or ideal vulva is highly influenced by the arguably distorted image related to our socio-psychological environment, as presented to us by the general media and internet. As physicians, we have to educate our patients on the variation of vulvar anatomy and the potential risks of these surgeries.
Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.



Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lloyd J, Crouch NS, Minto CL, Liao LSM, Creighton SM (2005) Female genital appearance: “normality” unfolds. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 112:643–646
Drake RL, Vogl W, Mitchell AWM (2006) Gray’s anatomie pour les étudiants. Elsevier Masson SAS
Dobbeleir JM, Landuyt KV, Monstrey SJ (2011) Aesthetic surgery of the female genitalia. Semin Plast Surg 25:130–141
Georgiou C, Benatar M, Dumas P, Chignon-Sicard B, Balaguer T, Padovani B, Baque P (2015) A cadaveric study of the arterial blood supply of the labia minora. Plast Reconstr Surg 136(1):167–178
Capraro VJ (1971) Congenital anomalies. Clin Obstet Gynecol 14:988–1012
Chavis WM, LaFerla JJ, Niccolini R (1989) Plastic repair of elongated, hypertrophic labia minora. A case report. J Reprod Med 34:373–375
Kato K, Kondo A, Gotoh M, Tanaka J, Saitoh M, Namiki Y (1988) Hypertrophy of labia minora in myelodysplastic women. Labioplasty to ease clean intermittent catheterization. Urology 31:294–299
Solanki NS, Tejero-Trujeque R, Stevens-King A, Malata CM (2010) Aesthetic and functional reduction of the labia minora using the Maas and Hage technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg JPRAS 63:1181–1185
Heusse J-L, Cousin-Verhoest S, Aillet S, Watier E (2009) Refinements in the labia minor reduction procedures. Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthétique 54:126–134
Radman HM (1976) Hypertrophy of the labia minora. Obstet Gynecol 48:78S–79S
Friedrich EG (1985) Vulvar dystrophy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 28:178–187
Rouzier R, Louis-Sylvestre C, Paniel BJ, Haddad B (2000) Hypertrophy of labia minora: experience with 163 reductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:35–40
Munhoz AM, Filassi JR, Ricci MD et al (2006) Aesthetic labia minora reduction with inferior wedge resection and superior pedicle flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:1237–1247; discussion 1248–50
Cunha F, Silva L (2011) Nymphoplasty: classification and technical refinements. Revista Brasileira de 26:507–511
Franco T, Franco D (1993) Hipertrofia de ninfas. J Bras Ginecol 103(5):163–165
Benadiba L (2010) Labiaplasty: plastic or cosmetic surgery? Indications, techniques, results and complications. Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthétique 55:147–152
Colson M-H (2012) Female cosmetic genital surgery: point-counterpoint. Gynécologie, obstétrique & fertilité 40:445–448
Liao L-M, Creighton SM (2011) Female genital cosmetic surgery: a new dilemma for GPs. Br J Gen Pract J R Coll Gen Pract 61:7–8
Veale D, Daniels J (2012) Cosmetic clitoridectomy in a 33 year old woman. Arch Sex Behav 41:725–730
Mahran MA, Rashid M, Leather A (2011) Exploring the psychosexual drive, before genital cosmetic surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 158:369–370
Conroy RM (2006) Female genital mutilation: Whose problem, whose solution? BMJ (Clinical researched) 333:106–107
Kelly B, Foster C (2012) Should female genital cosmetic surgery and genital piercing be regarded ethically and legally as female genital mutilation? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 119:389–392
Braun V, Kitzinger C (2001) The perfectible vagina: size matters. Cult Health Sex 3:263–277
Carolyn F, Davis M (2012) Cosmetic gynecology and the elusive quest for the “perfect” vagina. Obstet Gynecol 119:1083–1084
Yurteri-Kaplan LA, Antosh DD, Sokol AI, Park AJ, Gutman RE, Kingsberg SA, Iglesia CB (2012) Interest in cosmetic vulvar surgery and perception of vulvar appearance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(5):428
Abdulcadir J et al (2011) Care of women with female genital mutilation/cutting. Swiss Med Wkly 140:w13137
Organization mondiale de la santé (2008). Eliminer les mutilations sexuelles féminines: déclaration inter-institutions, Genève
Acknowledgements
None of the authors has a financial interest in any of the products or devices mentioned in this article. Funding was provided by CLERICO Cyril (Grant No. 06 66 82 68 63).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The original version of this article was revised: The correct spelling of the second author’s Family Name is “Lari”.
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0871-6.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clerico, C., Lari, A., Mojallal, A. et al. Anatomy and Aesthetics of the Labia Minora: The Ideal Vulva?. Aesth Plast Surg 41, 714–719 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0831-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0831-1