Abstract
This chapter argues that setting is a privileged aspect of the popular fantasy genre, and it analyses setting in terms of both how texts are created and how they are circulated and enjoyed. ‘Plot driven’ and ‘character driven’ are commonplace descriptions of modern fiction, and often mark a distinction between genres of differing value. While these phrases are most usually deployed in non-academic writing such as reviews and other opinion-based works, they have appeared in recent research around reading and empathy. According to Frank Lachmann, readers of so-called literary works scored higher in empathy tests than readers of popular fiction; he suggests that this is because empathy is more readily aroused by ‘character-driven’ fiction where ‘the emotional repertoire of the reader is enlarged’ than by ‘plot-driven’ fiction (2015, p. 144). I note that Lachmann makes no attempt to elaborate on what these phrases might specifically mean, nor is there any consideration of the ‘emotional repertoire’ of, say, romance fiction, which fits his definition of character driven and yet remains the most reviled of the popular genres. While, to my mind, good fiction needs to attend to both plot and character equally well, neither of these necessary aspects of storytelling comes readily to mind as a ‘driver’ when thinking about fantasy fiction. In fact, the big engine of the genre appears to be the exposition and elaboration of the setting, from which characterisation and plots specific to the setting are then generated. Fantasy novels are, in many ways, setting driven, a feature that marks them out as unique among popular genres. Other genres where setting is an acknowledged pleasure are historical fiction (for example the work of Philippa Gregory or Diana Gabaldon) and the exotic travel memoir (for example texts set in aspirational destinations such as Provence and Tuscany); but these at least rely on settings that are real. Fantasy fiction, on the other hand, invites readers to immerse themselves in and admire an incredibly detailed world that is an invention of the author’s imagination.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Works Cited
Abraham, D. (2012, April 23). Concerning historical authenticity in fantasy, or, truth forgives you nothing. Dribble of Ink. http://aidanmoher.com/blog/2012/04/articles/concerning-historical-authenticity-in-fantasy-or-truth-forgives-you-nothing-by-daniel-abraham/
Balfe, M. (2004). Incredible geographies? Orientalism and genre fantasy. Social & Cultural Geography, 5(1), 75–90.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bowman, M. R. (2010). Refining the gold: Tolkien, the battle of Maldon, and the northern theory of courage. Tolkien Studies, 7(1), 91–115.
Breepop. (2012). Does Drogo rape Daenerys? Games of Thrones: A Reddit of Ice and Fire. https://www.reddit.com/r/gameofthrones/comments/rmim2/does_drogo_rape_daenerys/
Butter, M. (2010). Caught between cultural and literary studies: Popular fiction’s double otherness. Journal of Literary Theory, 4(2), 199–216.
Clark, D. (2009). Between medieval men: Male friendship and desire in early medieval English literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Collins, S. T. (2012, March 28). Get medieval: The seven most awful things people did on game of thrones season one. Rolling Stone. http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/lists/get-medieval-the-seven-most-awful-things-people-did-on-game-of-thrones-season-one-20120328#ixzz3nxcOopl2
Ekman, S. (2013). Here be dragons: Exploring fantasy maps and settings. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.
Flood, A. (2015, April 10). George R. R. Martin revolutionised how people think about fantasy. Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2015/apr/10/george-rr-martin-revolutionised-how-people-think-about-fantasy
Glover, D. (1984). Utopia and fantasy in the late 1960s. In R. Brund et al. (Eds.), Popular fiction and social change. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Grossman, L. (2011, July 7). George R.R. Martin’s dance with dragons: A masterpiece worthy of Tolkien. Time. http://content.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,2081774,00.html
Heng, G. (2003). Empire of magic: Medieval romance and the politics of cultural fantasy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hoppenstand, G. (2011). Editorial: dancing with dragons. The Journal of Popular Culture, 44(5), 909–910.
Itzkoff, D. (2014, May 2). George R. R. Martin on game of thrones and sexual violence. ArtsBeat. http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/05/02/george-r-r-martin-on-game-of-thrones-and-sexual-violence/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=3
James, E. (2015). Tolkien, Lewis, and the explosion of genre fantasy. In E. James & F. Mendlesohn (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to fantasy literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, J. (2015, September 12). I’ve read Pratchett now: It’s more entertainment than art. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2015/sep/11/jonathan-jones-ive-read-terry-pratchett-now-its-more-entertainment-than-art
Kutzer, M. D. (1998). Thatchers and Thatcherites: Lost and found empires in three British fantasies. The Lion and the Unicorn, 22(2), 196–210.
Lachmann, F. M. (2015). Paul and I like to read good literature. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 10(2), 142.
Martin, G. R. R. (2011). A game of thrones. London: Harper Collins.
Mendlesohn, F. (2008). Rhetorics of fantasy. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.
Meyerson, M. D., Falk, O., & Thiery, D. (2004). ‘A great effusion of blood’?: Interpreting medieval violence. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Milliot, J. (2015, January 23). The hottest (and coldest) book categories of 2014: Self-help was tops in adult, science fiction/fantasy led juvenile. Publishers Weekly. http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/bookselling/article/65387-the-hot-and-cold-categories-of-2014.html?utm_source=Publishers+Weekly&utm_campaign=93eca72aaf-UA-15906914-1&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_0bb2959cbb-93eca72aaf-304636633
Neale, S. (1995). Questions of genre. In B. Keith Grant (Ed.), Film genre reader II. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Nicolay, T. F. (2014). Tolkien and the Modernists: literary responses to the dark new days of the 20th century. Jefferson: McFarland & Company.
‘One Steve Limit’ (n.d.). tvtropes. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/OneSteveLimit
Pantozzi, J. (2015, May 18). We will no longer be promoting H.B.O’s game of thrones. The Mary-Sue. http://www.themarysue.com/we-will-no-longer-be-promoting-hbos-game-of-thrones/
Tolkien, J. R. R. (1968). The lord of the rings. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Tolkien, J. R. R., Carpenter, H., & Tolkien, C. (1981). The letters of J.R.R. Tolkien. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Whitworth, M. H. (2010). Reading modernist poetry. Walden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilkins, K. (2016). From Middle Earth to Westeros: Medievalism, Proliferation and Paratextuality. In: Gelder, K. (eds) New Directions in Popular Fiction. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52346-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52346-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52345-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52346-4
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)