A Comparison of Children Aged 4–5 Years Learning to Read Through Instructional Texts Containing Either a High or a Low Proportion of Phonically-Decodable Words

• Allington, R. L. (2013). What really matters when working with struggling readers. The Reading Teacher,66(7), 520–530.

  Google Scholar 

• Allor, J. H., Gifford, D. B., Al Otaiba, S., Miller, S. J., & Cheatham, J. P. (2013). Teaching students with intellectual disability to integrate reading skills: Effects of text and text based lessons. Remedial and Special Education,34, 346–356.

  Google Scholar 

• Allor, J. H., Gifford, D. B., Jones, F. G., Al Otaiba, S., Yovanoff, P., Ortiz, M. B., et al. (2018). The effects of a text-centred literacy curriculum for students with intellectual disability. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities,123(5), 474–494.

  Google Scholar 

• Amendum, S. J., Conradi, K., & Hiebert, E. (2018). Does text complexity matter in the elementary grades? A research synthesis of text difficulty and elementary student’s reading fluency and comprehension. Educational Psychological Review,30(1), 121–151.

  Google Scholar 

• Arizpe, E., & Styles, M. (2003). Children reading pictures: Interpreting visual texts. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

  Google Scholar 

• Baker, M. (2016). Statisticians issue warning on p values. Nature,531, 151.

  Google Scholar 

• Beverly, B. L., Giles, M., & Buck, K. L. (2009). First-grade reading gains following enrichment: Phonics plus decodable texts compared to authentic literature read aloud. The Reading Teacher,53(4), 292–307.

  Google Scholar 

• Brown, K. J. (2000). What kind of text—For whom and when? Textual scaffolding for beginning readers. The Reading Teacher,53(4), 292–307.

  Google Scholar 

• Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest,19, 5–51.

  Google Scholar 

• Cheatham, P., & Allor, H. (2012). The influence of decodability in early reading text on reading achievement: A review of the evidence. Reading and Writing,25, 2223–2246.

  Google Scholar 

• Clark, M. M. (1976). Young fluent readers: What can they teach us?. London: Heineman Educational.

  Google Scholar 

• Clark, M. M. (2014). Synthetic phonics and literacy learning. Birmingham: Glendale Education.

  Google Scholar 

• Clarke, P., Snowling, M. J., Truelove, E., & Hulme, C. (2010). Ameliorating children’s reading-comprehension difficulties: A randomised controlled trial. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1–11.

  Google Scholar 

• Coles, G. (2004). Real books in the Caboose. Knowledge Quest,33(2), 22–25.

  Google Scholar 

• Department for Education [DfE]. (2010). Phonics teaching materials: Core criteria and the self-assessment process. London: HMSO.

  Google Scholar 

• Department for Education [DfE]. (2012). Criteria for assuring high-quality phonic work. London: HMSO.

  Google Scholar 

• Department for Education [DfE]. (2013). National curriculum for England. London: HMSO.

  Google Scholar 

• Department for Education [DfE]. (2014). National curriculum for english key stages 1 and 2. London: HMSO.

  Google Scholar 

• Dunn, L. M., Dunn, D. M., Sewell, J., Styles, B., Brzyska, B., Shamsan, Y., et al. (2009). The British Picture Vocabulary Scale (3rd ed.). London: GL Assessment.

  Google Scholar 

• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014). Scaffolded reading instruction of content-area texts. The Reading Teacher,67(5), 347–351.

  Google Scholar 

• Goodman, K. S. (1976). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist,6, 126–135.

  Google Scholar 

• Goswami, U., Barnes, L., Mead, N., Power, A. J., & Leong, V. (2016). Prosodic similarity effects in short-term memory in developmental dyslexia. Dyslexia. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1535.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Greene, J. F., & Wood, J. F. (2000). Language readers: Language readers level 1, book A, units 1-6 (pp. 4–7). Sopris West: Longmont, CO.

  Google Scholar 

• Hall, C. S. (2016). Inference instruction for struggling readers: A synthesis of intervention research. Educational Psychological Review,28(1), 1–22.

  Google Scholar 

• Hoffman, J. V., Sailors, M., & Patterson, E. U. (2002). Decodable texts for beginning reading instruction: The year 2000 basals. Journal of Literacy Research,34(3), 269–298.

  Google Scholar 

• House of Commons Education and Skills Committee. (2005). Teaching children to read, eighth report of session 2004-5. London: The Stationery Office, House of Commons.

  Google Scholar 

• Huey, E. D. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York: The Macmillan Company.

  Google Scholar 

• Hutchison, D., & Styles, B. (2010). A guide to running randomised controlled trials for educational researchers. Slough: NFER.

  Google Scholar 

• Jenkins, J. R., Peyton, J. A., Sanders, E. A., & Vadasy, P. F. (2004). Effects of reading decodable texts in supplemental first-grade tutoring. Scientific Studies of Reading,8(1), 53–85.

  Google Scholar 

• Kachorsky, D., Moses, L., Serafini, F., & Hoelting, M. (2017). Meaning making with picturebooks: Young children’s use of semiotic resources. Literacy Research and Instruction,56(3), 231–249.

  Google Scholar 

• Kelly, L. B., & Moses, L. (2018). Children’s literature that sparks inferential discussions. The Reading Teacher,72(1), 21–29.

  Google Scholar 

• Lacey, P., Layton, L., Miller, C., Goldbart, J., & Lawson, H. (2007). What is literacy for students with severe learning difficulties? Exploring conventional and inclusive literacy. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs,7(3), 149–160.

  Google Scholar 

• Marshall, B. (2011). English in the National Curriculum: A simple redraft or a major rewrite? The Curriculum Journal,22(2), 187–199.

  Google Scholar 

• Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (2008). Designing experiments and analysing data (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge Academic.

  Google Scholar 

• McNally, J., & Murray, W. (1962). Key words to literacy. London: The Schoolmaster Publishing Co.

  Google Scholar 

• Menter, I., Valeeva, R., & Kalimullin, A. (2017). A tale of two countries—Forty years on: politics and teacher education in Russia and England. European Journal of Teacher Education,40(5), 616–629.

  Google Scholar 

• Mesmer, H. A. E. (2009). Decodable text: A review of what we know. Reading Research and Instruction,40(2), 121–141.

  Google Scholar 

• Michaud, M., Dion, E., Barrette, A., Dupéré, V., & Toste, J. (2017). Does knowing what a word means influence how easily its decoding is learned? Reading & Writing Quarterly,33(1), 82–96.

  Google Scholar 

• Morris, E. (2012). Managing change—The relationship between education and politics. Better Evidence-based Education,4(2), 4–5.

  Google Scholar 

• Mosely, D. (2004). The diagnostic assessment of word recognition and phonic skills in five-year-olds. Journal of Research in Reading,27(2), 132–140.

  Google Scholar 

• Moses, L., & Kelly, L. B. (2018). ‘We’re a little loud. That’s because we like to read!’: Developing positive views of reading in a diverse, urban first grade. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy,18(3), 307–337.

  Google Scholar 

• Munton, G. (2006). Tab the cat. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Murray, B. A., McIlwain, M. J., Wang, C., Murray, G., & Finley, S. (2019). How do beginners learn to read irregular words as sight words? Journal of Research in Reading,41(1), 123–136.

  Google Scholar 

• Nahachewsky, J. (2013). Understanding the importance of ethos in composing the “everyday” new literacies classroom. Language and Literacy,15(1), 74–92.

  Google Scholar 

• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy. Washington D.C: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.

• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [NICHHD]. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

• Nuzzo, R. (2014). Scientific method: Statistical errors. P values, the ‘gold standard’ of statistical validity, are not as reliable as many scientists assume. Nature,506, 150–152.

  Google Scholar 

• Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted). (2019). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ofsted-inspection-handbooks-drafts-for-consultation Accessed 9 February 2019.

• Pearson, P. D. (2004). The reading wars. Educational Policy,18(1), 216–252.

  Google Scholar 

• Price-Mohr, R. M (2016). Comparing a controlled levelled text with a language rich text in a beginner reading scheme. University of York. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/12904/

• Pring, R. (2015). Philosophy of educational research (3rd ed.). London: Bloomsbury.

  Google Scholar 

• Protopapas, A., Mouzaki, A., Sideridis, G. D., Kotsolakou, A., & Simos, P. G. (2013). The role of vocabulary in the context of the simple view of reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties,29(2), 168–202.

  Google Scholar 

• Ricketts, J., Bishop, D. V. M., Pimperton, H., & Nation, K. (2011). The role of self-teaching in learning orthographic and semantic aspects of new words. Scientific Studies of Reading,15(1), 47–70.

  Google Scholar 

• Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A., & Davis, S. (2009). Effective reading programs for the elementary grades: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research,79(4), 1391–1466.

  Google Scholar 

• Smith, F. (1973). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

  Google Scholar 

• Smith, P. L., & Little, D. R. (2018). Small is beautiful: In defense of the small-N design. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,25(6), 2083–2101.

  Google Scholar 

• Snowling, M., Stothard, S. E., Clarke, P., Bowyer-Crane, C., Harrington, A., Truelove, E., et al. (2009). York assessment of reading for comprehension. London: GL Assessment.

  Google Scholar 

• Solar, J., & Openshaw, R. (2007). ‘To be or not to be?’: The politics of teaching phonics in England and New Zealand. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy,7(3), 333–352.

  Google Scholar 

• Solity, J., & Vousden, J. (2009). Real books vs reading schemes: A new perspective from instructional psychology. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology,29(4), 469–511.

  Google Scholar 

• Stahl, S. A., & Heubach, K. M. (2005). Fluency-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Literacy Research,37(1), 25–60.

  Google Scholar 

• Stephen, C. (2010). Pedagogy: The silent partner in early years learning. Early Years,30(1), 1–14.

  Google Scholar 

• Stokes, S. F., Kern, S., & DosSantos, C. (2012). Extended statistical learning as an account for slow vocabulary growth. Journal of Child Language,39(1), 105–129.

  Google Scholar 

• Tesar, M. (2019). Global politics and local impacts on educational policy. Policy Futures in Education,17(3), 302–305.

  Google Scholar 

• Torgerson, C. J., Brookes, G., & Hall, J. (2006). A systematic review of the research literature in the use of phonics in the teaching of reading and spelling. London: Department for Education and Skills (DfES).

  Google Scholar 

• Torgerson, D. J., & Torgerson, C. J. (2008). Designing randomised trials. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  Google Scholar 

• Victoria Liberal (2018). https://vic.liberal.org.au/News/2018-10-10/liberal-nationals-to-fund-decodable-readers-for-victorian-schools Accessed 9 February 2019.

• Vygotsky, L. (1978). The role of play in development, mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Walsh, M. (2003). ‘‘Reading’ pictures: What do they reveal? Young children’s reading of visual texts. Literacy,37(3), 123–130.

  Google Scholar 

• Wenz-Gross, M., & Upshur, C. (2012). Implementing a primary prevention social skills intervention in urban preschools: Factors associated with quality and fidelity. Early Education and Development,23(4), 427–450.

  Google Scholar 

• Wilson, J., & Comar, S. (2008). Re-evaluating the significance of phonemic awareness and phonics in literacy teaching: The shared role of school counsellors and teachers. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling,18(2), 89–105.

  Google Scholar 

Download references