Distinguishing approach, methodology, method, procedure and technique in process systems engineering

• Andiappan V (2017) State-of-the-art review of mathematical optimisation approaches for synthesis of energy systems. Process Integr Optim Sustain 1:165–188

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Andiappan V, Ng DS, Tan RR (2017) Design operability and retrofit analysis (DORA) framework for energy systems. Energy 134:1038–1052

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brookshier K (2018) Method vs. methodology: understanding the difference. In: UX Collect. https://uxdesign.cc/method-vs-methodology-whats-the-difference-9cc755c2e69d. Accessed 2 Nov 2019

• Burnham J (1999) Approach, method, technique: making distinctions and creating connections. J Syst Consult Manag 3:3–26

  Google Scholar 

• Chemmangattuvalappil NG (2010) A systematic property based approach for molecular synthesis using higher order molecular groups and molecular descriptors. Auburn University, Alabama

  Google Scholar 

• Dantzig GB (1990) Origins of the simplex method. In: Nash S (ed) A history in scientific computing. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, New York, pp. 141–151

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Dimian AC, Bildea CS, Kiss AA (2014) Integrated design and simulation of chemical processes, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  Google Scholar 

• Duran MA, Grossmann IE (1986) Simultaneous optimization and heat integration of chemical processes. AIChE J 32:123–138

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Educational Research Techniques (2019) Approach, method, procedure, and techniques in language learning. https://educationalresearchtechniques.com/. Accessed 2 Nov 2019

• El-Halwagi MM, Gabriel F, Harell D (2003) Rigorous graphical targeting for resource conservation via material recycle/reuse networks. Ind Eng Chem Res 42:4319–4328

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Foo DCY (2009) State-of-the-art review of pinch analysis techniques for water network synthesis. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:5125–5159

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Foo DCY, Tan RR (2016) A review on process integration techniques for carbon emissions and environmental footprint problems. Process Saf Environ Prot 103:291–307

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Friedler F, Tarjan K, Huang YW, Fan LT (1992) Graph-theoretic approach to process synthesis: axioms and theorems. Chem Eng Sci 47:1973–1988

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Grossmann IE (1990) MINLP optimization strategies and algorithms for process synthesis. In: Siirola J, Grosmann IE, Stephanopoulos G (eds) Foundations of computer-aided process design (FOCAPD’89). Elsevier, Amsterdam

  Google Scholar 

• Hofler DB (1983) Approach, method, technique—a clarification. Lit Res Instr 23:71–72

  Google Scholar 

• Horst R, Tuy H (1996) Global optimization: deterministic approaches. Springer, Berlin

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Land AH, Doig AG (1960) An automatic method of solving discrete programming problems. Econometrica 28:497–520

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lee SC, Ng DKS, Foo DCY, Tan RR (2009) Extended pinch targeting techniques for carbon-constrained energy sector planning. Appl Energy 86:60–67

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lee JH, Shin J, Realff MJ (2018) Machine learning: overview of the recent progresses and implications for the process systems engineering field. Comput Chem Eng 114:111–121

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Linnhoff B, Ahmad S (1990) Cost optimum heat exchanger networks—1. Minimum energy and capital using simple models for capital cost. Comput Chem Eng 14:729–750

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Linnhoff B, Townsend DW, Boland D et al (1982) User guide on process integration for the efficient use of energy. Institution of Chemical Engineers, Rugby

  Google Scholar 

• The Open University (2015) Managing complexity: a systems approach – introduction. The Open University, Milton Keynes

  Google Scholar 

• Ng LY (2015) Novel integrated design techniques for. The University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Semenyih

  Google Scholar 

• Ning C, You F (2019) Optimization under uncertainty in the era of big data and deep learning: when machine learning meets mathematical programming. Comput Chem Eng 125:434–448

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Seider WD, Seader JD, Lewin DR (2004) Product and process design principles: synthesis, analysis and evaluation, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Shah N (1996) Mathematical programming techniques for crude oil scheduling. Comput Chem Eng 20:1227–1232

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stephanopoulos G, Reklaitis GV (2011) Process systems engineering: from Solvay to modern bio- and nanotechnology. A history of development, successes and prospects for the future. Chem Eng Sci 66:4272–4306

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Tan RR, Foo DCY (2007) Pinch analysis approach to carbon-constrained energy sector planning. Energy 32:1422–1429

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tawarmalani M, Sahinidis NV (2002) Global optimization of mixed-integer nonlinear programs: a theoretical and computational study. Math Program 99:563–591

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ten JY (2017) The integration of safety and health aspects in chemical product design framework. The University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Semenyih

  Google Scholar 

• Venkatasubramanian V (2019) The promise of artificial intelligence in chemical engineering: is it here, finally? AIChE J 65:466–478

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Yee TF, Grossmann IE, Kravanja Z (1990) Simultaneous optimization models for heat integration-I. Area and energy targeting and modeling of multi-stream exchangers. Comput Chem Eng 14:1151–1164

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references