Table 3 Summary of the background modelling systematic uncertainties considered
\({\textbf {VH}}(\rightarrow b{\bar{b}})\) | |
\(WH(\rightarrow b{\bar{b}})\) normalisation | 27% |
\(ZH(\rightarrow b{\bar{b}})\) normalisation | 25% |
Diboson | |
WW/ZZ/WZ acceptance | 10%/5%/12% |
\(p_{\text {T}} ^V\) acceptance | 4% |
\(N_{\mathrm {jet}}\) acceptance | 7%–11% |
Z \(+\) jets | |
\(Z\,+\) hf normalisation | Floating |
\(Z\,+\) mf normalisation | Floating |
\(Z\,+\) lf normalisation | Floating |
\(Z\,{+}\,bb\) to \(Z\,{+}\,cc\) ratio | 20% |
\(Z\,{+}\,bl\) to \(Z\,{+}\,cl\) ratio | 18% |
\(Z\,{+}\,bc\) to \(Z\,{+}\,cl\) ratio | 6% |
\(p_{\text {T}} ^V\) acceptance | 1%–8% |
\(N_{\mathrm {jet}}\) acceptance | 10%–37% |
High-\(\Delta R\) CR to SR | 12%–37% |
0- to 2-lepton ratio | 4%–5% |
W4\(+\)jets | |
\(W+\,\)hf normalisation | Floating |
\(W+\,\)mf normalisation | Floating |
\(W+\,\)lf normalisation | Floating |
\(W{+}\,bb\) to \(W{+}\,cc\) ratio | 4%–10% |
\(W{+}\,bl\) to \(W{+}\,cl\) ratio | 31%–32% |
\(W{+}\,bc\) to \(W{+}\,cl\) ratio | 31%–33% |
\(W\rightarrow \tau \nu (+ c)\) to \(W{+}\,cl\) ratio | 11% |
\(W\rightarrow \tau \nu (+ b)\) to \(W{+}\,cl\) ratio | 27% |
\(W\rightarrow \tau \nu (+ l)\) to \(W{+}\,l\) ratio | 8% |
\(N_{\mathrm {jet}}\) acceptance | 8%–14% |
High-\(\Delta R\) CR to SR | 15%–29% |
\(W\rightarrow \tau \nu \) SR to high-\(\Delta R\) CR ratio | 5%–18% |
0- to 1-lepton ratio | 1%– 6% |
Top quark (0- and 1-lepton) | |
Top(b) normalisation | Floating |
Top(other) normalisation | Floating |
\(N_{\mathrm {jet}}\) acceptance | 7%–9% |
0- to 1-lepton ratio | 4% |
SR/top CR acceptance (\(t{\bar{t}}\)) | 9% |
SR/top CR acceptance (Wt) | 16% |
Wt / \(t{\bar{t}}\) ratio | 10% |
Top quark (2-lepton) | |
Normalisation | Floating |
Multi-jet (1-lepton) | |
Normalisation | 20%–100% |