Abstract
Lakatos’ philosophy of science is puzzling and can be interpreted in widely varying ways. According to the most widespread interpretation, his aim was to reconcile a basically Popperian outlook with the historical facts discovered by Kuhn and Feyerabend.2 The purpose of this paper is to use his work to critically assess the project of which, according to this interpretation, he was an outstanding representative. This project conceives the task of philosophy of science as showing the value of science by developing a normative theory of science, a methodology. Its chief representatives were the logical positivists and Popper. Currently, Larry Laudan is the leading representative of this approach. The turn of the century conventionalists Poincaré and Duhem do not belong here: they were interested in the epistemological status of scientific theories, rather than in laying down universal norms for scientific practice.3 It is for the same reason that later-day scientific realists like Richard Boyd or William Newton-Smith do not fit in here either. Their project is very much like that of the conventionalists, even though they reach practically the opposite conclusions. Kuhn and the other historically-minded authors also stand apart, for their approach is emphatically descriptive, not normative: they wish to study what happens in science rather than what should happen.
The research for this paper was supported by an OTKA grant, no. F21229.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Feyerabend, Paul K. (1975) Against Method, London: New Left Books.
Forrai, Gabor (1993) “From the Method of Proofs and Refutations to the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 7, 161176.
Hacking, Ian (1979) “Imre Lakatos’ Philosophy of Science”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 30, 381 410.
Hacking, Ian (1983) Representing and Intervening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakatos, Imre (1961) “Necessity, Kneale and Popper”, in (1978b) 121–127.
Lakatos, Imre (1963) “The Teaching of the History of Science”, in (1978b) 254–255.
Lakatos, Imre (1968) “Changes in the Problem of Inductive Logic”, in (1978b) 128–200.
Lakatos, Imre (1971a) “History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions”. in (1978a) 102–138.
Lakatos, Imre (1971b) “Replies to Critics”, in: P.S.A. 1970, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 8, edited by R.C. Buck and R.S. Cohen, Dordrecht: Reidel, 174–182.
Lakatos, Imre (1974a) “Popper on Demarcation and Induction”, in (1978a) 139–167.
Lakatos, Imre (1974b) “The Role of Crucial Experiments in Science” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science,4, 309–325.
Lakatos, Imre (1976) “Understanding Toulmin”, in (1978b) 224–243.
Lakatos, Imre (1978a) The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs, Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1, edited by J. Worrall and G. Currie, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakatos, Imre (1978b) Mathematics, Science and Epistemology, Philosophical Papers Vol. 2, edited by J. Worrall and G. Currie, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakatos, Imre (1978e) “The Problem of Appraising Scientific Theories: Three Approaches”, in (1978b) 107120.
Lakatos, Imre and Zahar, Elie G. (1976) “Why Did Copernicus’s Research Programme Supersede Ptolemy’s?”, in (1978a) 168–192.
Popper, Karl R. (1963) Conjectures and Refutations,London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Radvanyi, Janos (1989) “A Mathematical Bildungsroman”, History and Theory,28, 26–42 (published under the pseudonym John Kadvany).
Radvanyi, Janos (1998) “The Extraterritoriality of Imre Lakatos”, in: Late Editions, edited by G. Marcus, Chicago: University of Chicago Press (forthcoming).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Forrai, G. (2002). Lakatos, Reason and History. In: Kampis, G., Kvasz, L., Stöltzner, M. (eds) Appraising Lakatos. Vienna Circle Institute Library, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0769-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0769-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5922-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0769-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive