Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

The Governance of Corporate Sustainability: Empirical Insights into the Development, Leadership and Implementation of Responsible Business Strategy

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article explores how corporate governance processes and structures are being used in large Australian companies to develop, lead and implement corporate responsibility strategies. It presents an empirical analysis of the governance of sustainability in fifty large listed companies based on each company’s disclosures in annual and sustainability reports. We find that significant progress is being made by large listed Australian companies towards integrating sustainability into core business operations. There is evidence of leadership structures being put in place to ensure that board and senior management are involved in sustainability strategy development and are then incentivised to monitor and ensure implementation of that strategy through financial rewards. There is evidence of a willingness to engage and communicate clearly the results of these strategies to interested stakeholders. Overall, there appears to be a developing acceptance amongst large corporations that efforts towards improved corporate sustainability are not only expected but are of value to the business. We suggest that this is evidence of a managerial shift away from an orthodox shareholder primacy understanding of the corporation towards a more enlightened shareholder value approach, often encompassing a stakeholder-orientated view of business strategy. However, strong underlying tensions remain due to the insistent market emphasis on shareholder value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, W. F., & Monsen, R. J. (1979). On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-reported disclosure as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), 501–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ACSI (2012). Sustainability reporting practices of S&P/ASX 200 companies http://www.acsi.org.au/images/stories/ACSIDocuments/generalresearchpublic/Sustainability%20Reporting%20Journey%202012.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2013.

  • Adams, C. A., & Frost, G. R. (2008). Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Accounting Forum, 32, 288–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organisations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don't know about corporate social responsibility : A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, H. & Landau, I. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in Australia: A review, corporate law and accountability research group working paper no. 4, Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University http://www.buseco.monash.edu.au/blt/clarg/working-paper-4.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2013.

  • Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Governance and sustainability: An investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability. Management Decision, 46(3), 433–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asif, M., Searcy, C., Zutshi, A., & Fisscher, O. (2011). An integrated management systems approach to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1–11.

  • Australian Government, Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee (2006). The social responsibility of corporations.

  • Baker, M. (2011). Foreword to the second edition of Werther W. B. and Chandler D. strategic corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders in a global environment, SAGE Publications.

  • Banarra Consulting (2011). 2010 Labour practices in sustainability reporting—A review.

  • Baumann, D. & Scherer, A. G. (2010) MNEs and the UN global compact: An empirical analysis of the organizational implementation of corporate citizenship, institute of organization and administrative science, University of Zurich, IOU working paper no. 114.

  • Benn, S. (2012). Governance for sustainability: Challenges for theory and practice. In T. Clarke & D. Branson (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Corporate Governance (pp. 612–627). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benn, S., & Dunphy, D. (2011). ‘Human and ecological factors: A systematic approach to corporate sustainability’, sustainability and social science. In: Round Table Proceedings, pp. 95–124 http://www.minerals.csiro.au/sd/pubs/Benn_Dunphy_Final.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2013.

  • Berle, A. A. (1931). Corporate powers as powers in trust. Harvard Law Review, 44, 1049–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A. A. (1932). For whom corporate managers are trustees: A note. Harvard Law Review, 45, 1365–1372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009a). The pros and cons of rewarding social responsibility at the top. Human Resource Management, 48(6), 959–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009b). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthelot, S., Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2003). Environmental disclosure research: Review and synthesis. Journal of Accounting Literature, 22, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, M. M. (2004). Ownership and control: Rethinking corporate governance for the twenty-first century. In T. Clarke (Ed.), Theories of corporate governance: The philosophical foundations of corporate governance. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castka, P., Bamber, C. J., Bamber, D. J., & Sharp, J. M. (2004). ‘Integrating corporate social responsibility (CSR) into ISO management. The TQM Magazine, 16(3), 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, T. (1993). The political economy of the UK privatisation programme: A blueprint for other countries? In T. Clarke & C. Pitelis (Eds.), The political economy of privatisation (pp. 205–233). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, T. (2010) Recurring crises in Anglo-American corporate governance, contributions to political economy (pp. 9–32). Oxford University Press: Cambridge.

  • Clarke, T. (2013). Deconstructing the mythology of shareholder value. Accounting Economics and Law, 3(1), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, T., & Monkhouse, E. (1995). Repensando a empresa. Sao Paulo: Pioneira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett, P., & Hrasky, S. (2005). Voluntary disclosure of corporate governance practices by listed Australian companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review 13. 188–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conn (2005). Connecticut General Statute s33–756, State of Connecticut.

  • David, P., Bloom, M., & Hillman, A. J. (2007). Investor activism, managerial responsiveness and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bakker, G. A., Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society, 44, 283–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Graaf F. J., & Stoelhorst J. W. (2013). The role of governance in corporate social responsibility lessons from dutch finance. Business Society, 52(2), 282–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, S., & Whittaker, D. H. (2007). Re-embedding the corporation? Comparative perspectives on corporate governance, employment relations and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review 15, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. (1975). The research act. A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, E. M. (1932). For whom are corporate managers trustees? Harvard Law Review, 45, 1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (2000). Precis for ties that bind. Business and Society, 105(Winter), 436–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doppelt, B. (2003). Leading change toward sustainability: A change-management guide for business, government and civil society. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunphy, D., Griffiths, A., & Benn, S. (2007). Organizational change for corporate sustainability (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. & King, G. (2002). Empirical research and the goals of legal scholarship 69 University of Chicago Law Review 1.

  • FEE. (2011). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) indicators in annual reports: An introduction to current frameworks. Brussels: Federation of European Accountants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, A. G. (2008). Corporate governance as social responsibility: A research agenda. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 26, 452–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Compact/GRI (2007). Making the Connection: The GRI Guidelines and the Global Compact Communication on Progress, Global Reporting Initiative.

  • Godfrey, P. C., & Hatch, N. W. (2007). Researching corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(1), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, D. S. (1995). Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8, 78–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 315–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRI (2011a). Sustainability reporting guidelines, version 3.1, global reporting initiative.

  • GRI (2011b). How to use the GRI guidelines in conjunction with ISO 26000, global reporting initiative.

  • Guillen, M. F. (2004). Corporate governance and globalisation: Is there convergence across countries? In T. Clarke (Ed.), Theories of corporate governance: The philosophical foundations of corporate governance. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halme, M., & Huse, M. (1997). The influence of corporate governance, industry and country factors on environmental reporting. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(2), 137–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen E. G. & Reichwald, R. (2009). CSR Leadership study: Leading corporate responsibility in multinational corporations: A study in Germany’s biggest firms, report no. 01/2009 of the Institute for information, organization and management, TUM Business School.

  • Jose, A., & Lee, S.-M. (2007). Environmental reporting of global corporations: A content analysis based on website disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakabadse, A. P., & Kakabadse, N. K. (2007). CSR in the boardroom: Myth or mindfulness. In A. P. Kakabadse & N. K. Kakabadse (Eds.), CSR in practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakabadse, N. K., Rozuel, C., & Lee-Davis, L. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder approach—A conceptual review. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(4), 277–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmel, R.S. (1996). Implications of the stakeholder model, George Washington Law Review, 61, 1156, 1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keay, A. (2007). Tackling the issue of the corporate objective: An analysis of the united kingdom’s ‘enlightened shareholder value approach’. Sydney Law Review, 29, 577–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keay, A. (2010). Moving towards stakeholderism? Consituency statutes, enlightened shareholder value, and all that: Much ado about little? SSRN papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id = 115451.

  • Keay, A. (2013). The enlightened shareholder value principle and corporate governance. London: Roultedge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleine, A., & von Hauff, M. (2009). Sustainability-driven implementation of corporate social responsibility: application of the integrative sustainability triangle. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 517–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klettner, A. (2011). Steering sustainability. Sydney: Catalyst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klettner, A. (2012). Corporate governance and the global financial crisis. In T. Clarke & D. Branson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of corporate governance. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: Exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2010). The integration of corporate governance in corporate social responsibility disclosures. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG, (2011). KPMG International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011, KPMG International Cooperative.

  • Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., & Maon, F. (2009). Introduction: Corporate Social Responsibility Implementation. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 251–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S. & Ramsay, I., (2009) Stakeholders and Directors’ Duties: Law, Theory and Evidence, Working Paper.

  • Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBarnet, D., Voiculescu, A., & Campbell, T. (Eds.). (2007). The new corporate accountability: Corporate social responsibility and the law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, L., & Benn, S. (2013). Leadership for sustainability: An evolution of leadership ability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 369–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G., Ryu, K., & Mirvis, P. (2009). Leading corporate citizenship: Governance, structure, systems. Corporate Governance, 9(1), 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2009). Designing and implementing corporate social responsibility: An integrative framework grounded in theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nitkin, D., & Brooks, L. J. (1998). Sustainability auditing and reporting: The Canadian experience. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1499–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1998). Corporate governance: Improving competitiveness and access to capital in global markets. Paris: Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development.

  • OECD. (2009). Annual report on the OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises 2008. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services (2006). Corporate responsibility: Managing risk and creating value.

  • Philips, R. A., & Freeman, R. E. (2010). Stakeholders. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redmond, P. (2012). Directors’ duties and corporate social responsiveness. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 35, 317–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossouw, G. J. (2005). Business ethics and corporate governance: A global survey. Business and Society, 44(1), 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runhaar, H., & Lafferty, H. (2009). Governing corporate social responsibility: An assessment of the contribution of the UN global compact to CSR strategies in the telecommunications industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 479–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russel, S., Haigh, N., & Griffiths, A. (2007). Understanding corporate sustainability: Recognizing the impact of different governance systems. In S. Benn & D. Dunphy (Eds.), Corporate governance and sustainability: Challenges for theory and practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. V., & Harrison, N. S. (2005). Organizational design and environmental performance: Clues from the electronics industry. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 582–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, S., Maurer, M., Ruhli, E., & Hoffman, R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility from a ‘stakeholder view” perspective: CSR implementation by a Swiss mobile telecommunication provider. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 506–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schembera, S. (2012). Implementing corporate social responsibility: Empirical insights on the impact and accountability of the UN global compact, University of Zurich, business working paper series, working paper no. 316.

  • Searcy, C. (2012). Corporate sustainability performance measurement systems: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stout, L. (2012). The shareholder value myth, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler; cf lynn stout, (2012), new thinking on “Shareholder Primacy”. Accounting Economics and Law,. doi:10.1515/2152-2820.1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taneja, S. S., Taneja, P. K., & Gupta, R. K. (2011). Researches in corporate social responsibility: A review of shifting focus, Paradigms and Methodologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP Finance Initiative (2004). The materiality of social, environmental and governance issues to equity pricing, Geneva: UNEP.

  • UNEP FI/WBCSD (2010). Translating ESG into sustainable business value, UNEP FI and World Business Council for Sustainable Development.

  • Van Velsor, E. (2006). Introduction: Leadership and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance, 9(1), 3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veleva, V. R. (2010). Managing corporate citizenship: A new tool for companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), 40–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser W. (2011). The age of responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the New DNA of Business, Wiley, United Kingdom.

  • Weinstein, O. (2012). Firm,Property and governance: From Berle and Means to agency theory, and beyond. Accounting Economics and Law, 2(2), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Views from the frontline. Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 279–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, W., Bao, Y., & Verbeke, A. (2011). Integrating CSR initiatives in business: An organizing framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Corporate Governance, University of Technology Sydney, City Campus, Broadway, PO Box 123, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia

    Alice Klettner, Thomas Clarke & Martijn Boersma

Authors
  1. Alice Klettner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Clarke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martijn Boersma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alice Klettner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klettner, A., Clarke, T. & Boersma, M. The Governance of Corporate Sustainability: Empirical Insights into the Development, Leadership and Implementation of Responsible Business Strategy. J Bus Ethics 122, 145–165 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1750-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1750-y

Keywords