- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 14:15:34 +0200
- To: Sebastian Samaruga <ssamarug@gmail.com>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, public-rww <public-rww@w3.org>, public-model@w3.org, pragmaticweb@lists.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de, public-declarative-apps@w3.org, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
Sebastian, I've said this before and I'll say it again: why do you need to build a (meta)model above RDF? Kind, SubjectKind, Dimension etc. -- why is all this stuff necessary? Do not attempt to extend RDF, and drop the UML/object-oriented models. Instead, work *within* RDF: use triples to store data, and use OWL ontologies, classes, properties, datatypes etc. to model your ___domain. Those are the only things you need. Show us your ontologies, then you will get better responses. You can try some of these ontology editors: http://protege.stanford.edu/ http://www.cognitum.eu/semantics/FluentEditor/ http://www.topquadrant.com/tools/modeling-topbraid-composer-standard-edition/ Martynas On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 5:20 AM, Sebastian Samaruga <ssamarug@gmail.com> wrote: > (Apologies for cross posting / over posting) > > Hi, I'm currently a software student and developer. Since I've meet semantic > related technologies development about twelve years ago I've been revolving > with the idea that a framework could be built that could ease building > semantic business applications as they are frameworks for Java and > relational databases. > > A lot of time passed. Now many big players offer solutions that somehow rely > on semantics for their work. And although this could seem strange, here in > Buenos Aires I couldn't find anyone really interested in the area, being in > academia or places I've worked in. > > So, having no one to share my thoughts with, I'm frequently publishing > documents to this list(s) hoping for some kind of peer's feedback. Sorry if > this aren't the right lists or I'm off topic. I send my attachment as a PDF > document. Anyone willing to comment in the original just ask me for the > Google Docs link. > > Note: I've sent this draft before but in a very early version state. I > invite anyone interested in reading to see the last section (Dashboards). > Maybe I'm wrong but I think there is a lot of innovation that may be done > regarding that subject (sorry for the poor diagrams :--) > > Best Regards, > Sebastián Samaruga.
Received on Saturday, 1 October 2016 12:16:06 UTC