Americana/Roots music is a vehicle for people across the world to express themselves in a shared musical language of common people.
For many cultures of the world, the most prominent musical genres are either highly parochial or highly corporatized (the latter also being the case in the USA).
Americana/Roots music still sits in place apart from those other genres, and while this probably limits the possible financial success of its practitioners, it preserves its authenticity and therefore it's broad appeal.
That raises the question, why doesn't every other form of authentic folk music around the world have the same broad appeal? Why aren't musicians all over the world taken up, say, Indian or Chinese folk music in total (vs borrowing themes or instruments)?
Because even Americana/Roots music has been a major source of the waves of US cultural and economic imperialism that have flowed over the world, from at least the early days of jazz and and definitely in the days of blues, rock, r&b, and rap.
This is about soft power, isn't it? There was a time when Chinese folk music was extremely popular in Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, and the rest of Southeast Asia.
Then Japanese folk music started to become really popular.
These days, it's K-pop that's super popular all over Asia and it's catching on throughout the rest of the world too.
I'd say all the popular genres are descended from the same musical tree, from baroque to classical to romantic to modern. Americana is probably barely a century old, and is just another branch on that trunk.
Eastern folk music is a different plant.
African drum music as well, but is a hybrid that has integrated itself into the modern music structure.
At least among musicians, it's my understanding that "Americana" is a relatively narrow category of indigenous American music. For instance, it doesn't include ragtime, jazz, funk, rock, hip-hop, blues, soul, spiritual, gospel, etc.
> At least among musicians, it's my understanding that "Americana" is a relatively narrow category of indigenous American music.
I've never heard of it referring to the music of indigenous Americans (American Indians).
The most common definition (per the Americana Music Association) has connections to nearly all the genres you mentioned, and with a strong historical connection to the American South.
My definition includes all those genres. And I’m a musician. I’d say that among music critics maybe, but in my musical circle and maybe even musicologists, Americana is inclusive of blues, jazz, rock, etc.
> Perhaps because Canada has english, a east coast, a west, and the great plains.
There are geographical similarities but I think it is more cultural.
Culturally, Canada and the USA are extremely similar. What a lot of people who don't live in Canada often fail to realize is that the vast, overwhelming majority of our population is concentrated in southern Canada... and that these areas are often even SOUTH OF PARTS OF THE USA in terms of latitude.
For example, Seattle WA lies on roughly the same latitude as Ottawa, ON which is quite north of Toronto. Detroit Michigan borders Windsor, ON (my home town) and Windsor is to the south of Detroit.
When broadcast television and radio were in their prime, we all watched American TV and listened to American radio (and the northern USA got Canadian channels etc).
In border towns like Vancouver and Windsor, it's not uncommon for people to have family on both sides of the border or to even live in one country and hold a day job in another.
A lot of Canadians have winter homes in southern states. Florida is a popular destination for east-coast Canadians and, while I don't know if it has changed, a typical visitor visa for Canadians let us stay for up to 6 months before we have to go back. And a lot of people even hold dual-citizenship.
Dual citizen here living on the Canadian side. It will be interesting to see how the political unraveling in the U.S. will force Canadians to regard and reinforce aspects of our culture that are distinct.
It is also interesting that you mention Canadian snowbirds. That too, at least anecdotally seems to be changing. In the last few weeks I ran into two individuals who are both working on unloading their homes in Florida on account all of this xenophobic sentiment.
There’s this old proposal that Bermuda join Canada as a province. Related proposal exists for the Turks and Caicos Islands. In the early 20th century, the Bahamas even negotiated to join Canada, but the plan was derailed by racial anxieties and the negotiations were abandoned.
Maybe, some day, Canada could (peacefully and consensually) acquire itself some Caribbean provinces
I always thought it was because of long dark days in winter due to high latitudes, when there is nothing better to do than make music :-D Also explains the Seattle grunge, and all the good musicians from Alaska.
The accents actually change more east-west. That's why all the movies filmed in Vancouver using local actors sound just like those filmed in LA. The "neutral" accents of the US midwest are similar to those of the Canadian prairies. Only in the east does the north-south thing become so prominent.
Despite its Grand Ol' Opery fame, on the ground Nashville has a diversity of musicians because of musical infrastructure, cost of living, and a social normality of musicianship.
Of course Nashville is not a hothouse of radical music, but we are talking about Americana right?
I speak of the corporate "Nashville" music publishing scene that controls what gets promoted as the latest flavor of "Country", not what happens locally in the city. A lot of what gets classed as Americana would have been played on country radio into the 70s.
Pedal steel is perhaps the most Americana of instruments; there were few pedal steel players better than Jerry Garcia, and few bands with larger repertoires of Americana than the Grateful Dead.
In the 1970’s, the Grateful Dead weren’t played on country radio. Indeed they were barely on radio at all anywhere until Touch of Gray in the mid 1980’s.
And then only because of MTV…which in the early days refused to air videos by black musicians.
Nashville was no different from the rest of US pop culture industry then. And is no different today. Americana still fares much better there than EDM, Punk, and Rap.
According to Wikipedia they aired music by Black musicians from day 1, with the Specials among others in their first program [0].
They were criticized for not having enough black acts. That's a reasonable criticism, but let's not make it sound like some kind of apartheid. They made a commercial decision about what genres to focused on, rather than something racially motivated. They didn't air many videos by country singers or classical violinists either.
Wikipedia’s article whitewashes the actual history. We were watching MTV and smoking weed in those Reagan’s America days.
—
In fairness the US music industry had the race music chart which became the R&B chart to keep black musicians off the pop chart and Elvis’s controversy was singing black music…and consequently being played on white radio stations to white kids.
Lots of white artists were repackaging black recordings for segregated radio play in the 40s and 50s. It was routine in that era for any popular song to be covered by many artists within the same year, so it wasn't entirely insidious but there was a definite whitewashing going on with more than just Elvis. Georgia Gibbs is a notable case. Elvis' controversy was more the "sexualized" dancing which was among the things sanitized out of the covers.
Art is a comment on culture. It is often easier for an outsider to comment than it is for someone steeped in that culture. There are no doubt many aspects of American culture that go unnoticed by Americans but are obvious to Canadians.
The average American knows that Canada is in North America, as does the average Canadian, the average Englishman, and the average Australian.
The average non‐American is from outside the Anglosphere, and so may be from a culture that considers North America and South America to be a single continent. But continents don’t have an objective definition, only a cultural one, and in the language and culture of the Anglosphere the Americas are distinct continents, America is a country, and Americans are that country’s people.
I’ve never met a Canadian who clamored to be called an American. (Except naturalized citizens!)
That works, since the USA is the only current country with America in its name. There was another, but it got split up. We don't call denizens of Mexico the UMSians despite the country's name literally translating to the United Mexican States. Also, for a long time denizens in the US identified by state of birth or locality first before American. Civil War and World Wars changed that.
One of the cultural touchstones of being a Canadian is the smug yet bleak realization that your tiny (in population) nation has produced so many titans of various creative fields, but everyone thinks they’re American because they had to bugger off down there to get their careers going.
Not sure if Canadians are aware of this, but Canada does two things really well:
1) Developing its own domestic artists/musicians, to a much greater degree than the US (eg https://www.factor.ca/)
2) Greatly restricting smaller foreign acts (especially from the US) from performing in Canada for commercial purposes
Yes, point #2 also applies to the US, but it's not enforced. But if you cross into Canada with musical instruments, they'll put the fear of God into you.
This is largely why the phenomena you describe exists: artists can develop within their domestic cocoon, without being crowded-out by Americans, and then tour their larger, wealthier neighbor to greatly expand their profile virtually risk-free.
2) Greatly restricting smaller
foreign acts (especially from
the US) from performing in
Canada for commercial purposes
Yes, point #2 also applies to
the US, but it's not enforced.
But if you cross into Canada
with musical instruments,
they'll put the fear of God into
you.
This almost never has the intended effect of producing world class homegrown musical or cinema acts. Like almost a 100% failure rate especially when theres a shared language.
Lots of countries have this quota system where they try to artificially force feed homegrown music, tv shows and movies and it never works.
People always gravitate to the larger American sphere because it doesnt have such restrictions in place. They dont work anyway.
When I first saw Matteo Garrone's Gomorrah (2008) it was so fresh and un-Hollywood like in the presentation of the raw violence and vice, that it stunned me. I still cant stand most PG-fied and Disney-fied American films.
Even as a U.S. citizen this hits me frequently. A lot of amazing comedians I didn't realize were Canadian for a long time, as a U.S. citizen. Norm Macdonald comes to mind, but he's far from alone.
Canada has government programs requiring broadcasters to broadcast Canadian content. So there are strong economic incentives to find, fund, develop, and promote Canadian artists working in various media.
In my undergrad days I learned about the MAPL classification to be considered Canadian content: Music, Artist, Performance, Lyrics
IIRC you need to hit 3/4 to be considered Canadian content.
At that time J Biebs was big, but since his music and lyrics were written by Americans and he performed/recorded in the States, his music was not CanCon despite him being Canadian. So, at the radio station I volunteered at, his music would count towards the 30% quota of not-CanCon music.
For Norm, just the crude nature of a lot of his jokes felt like something that was very "American", at least certainly in the 90s and 2000s. His delivery, on the other hand, always felt fairly unique to me. It's also possible I just mistook characteristics of Canadian comics as being those of American comics by simply not realizing how many popular comedians are Canadian.
Bob Catface (https://bsky.app/profile/bobcatface.bsky.social) has a Discord (Mostly Shortwave Discord: discord.gg/fr4Uuw4z5h) where you can receive notices when these come on the air. If you are a ham radio operator or SWL, you can decode MSFK usually with these shows.
I've been thinking a lot about the Leningrad Cowboys recently. I've always loved their performance of Gimme All Your Lovin' with the Red Army Choir, and after looking that up on YouTube last year, The algorithm eventually started feeding me more of their songs, some of which I vaguely recognized, others were totally new to me, but I learned a lot about them.
Mostly that they've got no respect for genre boundaries. They play a lot of American rock and pop with Russian folk influences, but also the other way around, and later started mixing in even more genres. And they're always funny and irreverent.
A personal favourite is their interpretation of Eloise, which includes the weird shout "Kozachok!", which is the name of a Ukrainian dance, but is also used (in exactly the same rhythm, though a lot more repetitive) in a French or Romanian cover of a Russian or Ukrainian song (I momentarily forgot which one or who the singer of that cover is). Anyway, complex references that are nearly impossible to get.
Also, having the Red Army Choir perform parodies of American pop and rock songs seems like something that was only possible in the early 1990s, after east-west tensions had softened, the Cold War ended, and we got closer together. And the Leningrad Cowboys definitely did their part to bring us together. Sometimes I wonder if maybe we need them again.
I was absolutely impressed/puzzled by the Leningrad Cowboys as a kid.
In the mid-2000s, J. Karjalainen (a Finnish musician) put out a concept album called Lännen-Jukka. If you like Blues, it's worth checking out. YLE, the Finnish media network, put out a documentary on it. Karjalainen travels through the US including significant time in Upper Michigan, where many Finns settled a hundred years ago (and more recently).
Another thing I remember is that while here, Karjalainen & his bandmates were detained by the TSA at Minneapolis St Paul airport and treated rather poorly. Apparently TSA thought they were gonna overstay their visas in the US and try to "make it big in music". It was very bizarre.
From the outside: isn't modern American culture just a parody of itself?
And isn't that why there are so many who claim to be "Irish" or "Italian" even though they're third or fourth generation and have never set foot in the countries.
I'll probably grab UK citizenship soon, but I would never say "I'm British". Nor would I if I had British parents (I don't) when I was still in NZ, before I'd even set foot in the UK.
Yeah, the way Americans mean "I'm X nationality" and the way the rest of the world means it are different. I don't think when Americans say "I'm Italian" they mean "I was born and raised in Italy and Italian is my native language", as we do, they just mean "I have distant Italian ancestry", and that's widely understood to mean that in the US. If an American said to another American "I'm Italian", I don't think the latter would ask "oh, how was your childhood in Italy?".
> Yeah, the way Americans mean "I'm X nationality" and the way the rest of the world means it are different.
I don’t think this is uniquely American - I know people in Australia who identify as Italian despite the fact their parents were born here. And I wonder if you’d find something similar in other places where large numbers of Italians emigrated, such as Argentina. And the same applies to various other groups too, mutatis mutandis.
A word like “Italian” can variously describe legal nationality/citizenship, ethnicity, ancestry, language, self-identification - and different combinations of those possibilities in different contexts or as used by different speakers
> I'll probably grab UK citizenship soon, but I would never say "I'm British"
I’m a British citizen, but I’m not British. I’ve never stepped foot in the UK in my whole life, I became a citizen through descent.
And my late grandmother, who was born in Scotland and lived the first half of her life there, I remember once calling her Scottish, and she corrected me “I’m not Scottish, I’m Irish” (both her parents were born in Ireland)
When someone says they're Irish or Italian they mean it as an ethnicity, not a nationality, and it often has an implied "-American" suffix. Irish-Americans are a distinct ethnic group, at least historically; you might compare it to, say, Cuban or Haitian immigrants, who each have distinct communities, cultures, and so forth, often even distinct from their namesake countries'.
And some of the most influential Westerns were shot by Italians in the deserts of Spain, often without any of them ever having set foot in the US, and with a grasp of English barely a notch above miming. The stereotypical Western (as it is known today) is largely Italian-made, especially when it comes to the music (Ennio Morricone): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaghetti_Western
It's a great twist of irony perhaps that it is media that takes cultural appropriation (albeit from a point of admiration) often ends up reaching further than the original.
It's not just for americana, many staples for european-inspired or gothic fantasy are made by the japanese, even if most of these creators don't speak english. Well in a sense perhaps it's the unique feature of the Western legacy that it's virtually transcended for everyone to use, rather than just a single group.
The Western movies and books are widely known for every Grandpa in Spain except for the actual Far West history.
In the 70's, tons of people bought a-dime novels full of cheap Western like 'pulp' stories written from Spanish authors with English nicknames at the cover.
Later, with the widely spread television, spies and officers/detectives took that role seamlessly, with Charles Bronson et all. Because in the end it's the same story everywhere. Lonely wolf vs the baddies. That stuff sold well everywhere, because every society has its badass hero.
I'm pretty sure tons of French directors set lots of drama/action movies in the US too.
Oh, and not just white officers. The Asian Martial Arts exploitation with Bruce Lee and clones was widely seen from their sons too in late 70's/early 80's.
And these would be surely cloned in the US too.
Ninjas, samurais and exotic Japanese and Chinese fighters were pretty much everywhere too. And, OFC, Dragon Ball in Europe was a huge success in late 80's, even if at the beginning it just was a comedy manga/anime.
Dragon Ball does the same in the end with the Chinese culture being remade from the Japanese as a parody...
Franco-Belgian… Goscinny and Giraud were French, but Morris and Charlier were Belgian. I am not writing this to pick nits, but the Franco-Belgian bandes dessinées were very much a synergy, worth more than the separate parts.
This sort of thing has a long-standing tradition in Europe, by the way. Karl May of the Winnetou fame wrote what is probably one of the popular Western book series in the world without ever having been to US.
Indeed, Wikipedia says the term was coined by a Spaniard:
> According to veteran spaghetti Western actor Aldo Sambrell, the phrase spaghetti Western was coined by Spanish journalist Alfonso Sánchez in reference to the Italian food spaghetti.
The Articles of Interest podcast (affiliated with 99% Invisible, I think) has a good series on Ivy fashion, and covers Take Ivy and the Japanese interest in it extensively.
For many cultures of the world, the most prominent musical genres are either highly parochial or highly corporatized (the latter also being the case in the USA).
Americana/Roots music still sits in place apart from those other genres, and while this probably limits the possible financial success of its practitioners, it preserves its authenticity and therefore it's broad appeal.
That raises the question, why doesn't every other form of authentic folk music around the world have the same broad appeal? Why aren't musicians all over the world taken up, say, Indian or Chinese folk music in total (vs borrowing themes or instruments)?
Because even Americana/Roots music has been a major source of the waves of US cultural and economic imperialism that have flowed over the world, from at least the early days of jazz and and definitely in the days of blues, rock, r&b, and rap.
reply