Christmas markets are more of a general consumer place than a christian place
Killer probably wanted to go in the most crowded place in town. Could have been Disneyland if it was Paris
I'd like to elaborate that makes sense you what information you lack. In general, competition between adversaries always exists, and in the same way that you might compensate a spy, you'd compensate a saboteur. In specific, China has a market and raw materials that are of great interest to some businessmen, Russia has materials and geopolitical connections.
No. Nord Stream seem more and more having been an Ukrainian action. Maybe not official government, but obviously more in Ukrainian interest than in Russian.
I can't see any Ukrainian interest an cutting internet between two of their supporters. Whether the support has been sufficient can be debated, but both are supporters. Germany among the top in absolute terms, Finland among the top relative to their own size. Yes among, there are stronger supporters in both categories.
I'm not sure if it is feasible to provide all relevant sources to someone who doesn't follow a field. It is quite common knowledge that LLMs in their current form have no ability to recurse directly over a prompt, which inherently limits their reasoning ability.
I am not looking for all sources. And I do follow the field. I just don’t know the sources that would back the claim they are making. Nor do I understand why limits on recursion means there is no reasoning and only memorization.
The closest explanation to how chain of through works is suppressing the probability of a termination token.
People have found that even letting llms generate gibberish tokens produces better final outputs. Which isn't a surprise when you realise that the only way a llm can do computation is by outputting tokens.
Unless you are building one of the frontier models, I’m not sure that your experience gives you insight on those models. Perhaps it just creates needless assumptions.
I know and support the intention of the article wholeheartedly, but I think we have to come clean as a society by stopping "good" misinformation first¹. Then, tackling bad misinformation becomes more manageable.
¹ Misinformation in the style of polls showing Harris being "slightly" in front of Trump all the time, Biden's health, etc.
I've seen that recently after watching part of a YouTube video about something and thinking oh this is crap, I'll find some written article - only to start reading the exact same thing a few seconds later on an apparently unrelated blog.
Youtube/Instagram Reels/Tiktok is the (sad) future. "Classical" media is a zombie.
Google is deader than dead on the search front. But I think they'll go the IBM route, albeit more successful