These simulations are great. With the balance example if you move the clock back and forth at resonance frequency, you can get it really twisted up so it doesn't work: https://postimg.cc/xXFgbxtn
So the trick is to disguise it as an accident. Have the zip bomb look like a real HTML file at the beginning, then have zeroes after that, like it got corrupted.
well, what does "damage" mean in that law? filling the disk isn't destructive. filling RAM isn't destructive. there's nothing in a zip-bomb approach that is destructive; a reboot or an `rm` (at most) undoes it all. I would say that this doesn't qualify as a destructive operation in any way.
Seems like the proper fix would have been to remove the file from the server when they realized the increased traffic. Then clients would just fail to check the update each time and not tie up bandwidth.
I think you misunderstood my question (to be charitable). It was to focus on policies (rather than personalities and people), and which ones(s) one was opposed to. If there no opposition to the policies themselves, does it really matter if you don't like the person?
reply