sorry for this and thanks for trying out. wld you mind emailing me here vsap78atgmaildotcom. i am not seeing error logs in my webapp console and google auth is also showing no errors. one thing i might suggest is, clear you cache and try again.
Single-digit-nanometer-node custom ASICs aren't really required to achieve this. Although there is higher latency this can and has been done on FPGAs at a company I worked for which designed and built custom AVOD systems for private jets and helicopters.
There are so many companies that I am sure countless individuals have come along and have solved a problem for themselves that many other customers probably have. These solutions hardly ever surface.
I for one was upset when I bought a HiFi amp from Cambridge Audio (CXA-81) and it came with an IR controller. The only way to be able to control that amp through the app is by means of a DAC which costs another couple of thousand dollars. I refused to accept this as my solution. I wrote a web server that used a Raspberry Pi Zero W and an IR transmitter along with a rudimentary Android app that had a series of buttons which corresponded to the functionalities I needed.
Even using the client's keys it would be a good idea to give a disclaimer that their key may be stored (If that is the case) and can be accessible through nefarious means. People are very susceptible to phishing attempts etc. and this sort of business model (where you have the client supply the key and store it through the browser is a slippery slope.
From an application developer's perspective, the nice thing about using a passkey with a browser cookie is that you don't have to store anything sensitive. You're only guarding access to your own app with meaningless numbers. If your app doesn't store other sensitive data, the blast radius is small. There are still denial of service attacks to worry about where an attacker can use network or compute to run up your bill.
What are we guarding when building an app that uses a cloud API that costs money? Access to more compute resources. Probably a lot more than the app itself ever uses. It raises the stakes a bit. Still, in monetary terms, you're operating a vending machine that the user puts money into.
Maybe there could be some kind of protocol and workflow to securely buy a dollar of compute time from an AI vendor?
If they send some of the money to the app developer's account, it's starting to sound like an app store or micropayments system.
That's a different language design mistake, which several languages have had to fix including C# back in C# 5.
The question there is, does our for-each style loop make a new variable each iteration, with the appropriate value, or does it have a single variable and it's just re-assigned for each iteration. People who haven't designed a language before might think the second option sounds optimal and won't make a practical difference, but it's actually very annoying and that's why Go changed to the former.
This time though it's not about the variable staying the same, the problem is that we got a copy of the data we cared about, not a mutable reference to that data.
> Previously, organizations with mission-critical workloads lacked access to important cloud and AI capabilities when in demanding edge environments, including those that present unique challenges and requirements.
The value comes from the value of selling ads and knowing everything about the product. In this case the viewer. Value prop for building the ability to still have insight into your product is there. It captures all the people who think they are clever by not connecting through WiFi and not understanding that it can be done over HDMI.
Your GPS/radio head unit is likely not at all the one reporting data maliciously to OEM/Vendor integrators etc. GPS is an open standard at least until the US Military says "this is no longer open."
Auto OEMs as a rule have more "data points" for inference than any other hardware platform/software integration. IE; actions you take in the car and the info gleamed from those actions ar more valuable to marketers than data from your cell phone. None of this needs a gps signal, there are dozens of speed,time,weight,weather,delta, sensors..
Ford for example can brag that it, more than any other manufacturer on the planet, knows exactly how often you go to gas station X from ___location Y, if you get gas, and where you go after. They can tell where you look, how much you weigh, your common routine, even your contacts PID. You type of "personality" can be determined trivially (IE buying/travel habits).
Your vehicle is 100 percent complicent in building a marketing/safety profile for you.
Is this^ even "bad"? I think so. But I am not an expert and have yet to have an issue with it in my life.
I brute forced the IR codes for my Cambridge Audio CXA81 amp, wrote a web server in go that has endpoints to correspond with the actions, wired up a Raspberry Pi Zero W with an IR transmitter, and wrote a Android app as a virtual remote control that connects over WiFi to the webserver on the Raspberry Pi Zero W. I wanted to control my amp from anywhere in my house and Cambridge Audio didn't make that Amp controllable through their app.
