Interested in that too.

I have to be honest - I haven't ever heard about it. Just checked and found it's very mature and popular, though it seems to have had no commits in the last 2 years.

After quick scanning, I'd highlight these 2 differences: - Rill is type safe and uses generics - Rill does not try to hide channels, it just provides primitives to transform them

Same conclusion here. May I ask about your stack/___domain?

Yes, but one does not have to reliably make assertions to feed a meme.

People want to be good. The current agenda God says you are good if you sacrifice to the CO2 god. No need to make reliable assertions to feel good about it. Anyone who challenges the act of sacrifice is someone to burn. No challenge means no problems.

Anyone who wants to see both sides of the Co2 discussion is already sceptical at minimum. But it does not make you feel good. Therefore its rare. It feels good to sacrifice to the Co2 god. “Lemme sacrifice you fool.”

Very cool. Turned my brain off. High pitch is a bit too sharp fir me.

We are the AGI :)

Wondering if there would be an "easier" way to express something in biology/evolution, then the evolution would (already) compressed it like that.

Maybe by definition: current existing things in evolution are not "more compressable" (for us) without losing meaning? (Their meaning could be estimated though through -leaky- abstractions?)

I I try to type randomly without checking the prediction, I get 67-70%, if I check it, I can easily get it to 46-50%.

It is really interesting.

LOL!