Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rusk's comments login

Not interested in clicking twitter either but in the name of progress I went there and what I found was a pretty disgusting misuse of the platform.

Basically a “hate on Obama” hit piece. Fucking snore.

“””

Ever wonder why sedans disappeared and every car is huge now?

"Thanks, Obama!"

His administration changed fuel economy standards in a way that had the perverse impact of making cars even bigger.

Here are all the vehicles for sale by the 3 largest US automakers. 62 vehicles, 4 sedans (6%). 20 years ago this chart would have been ~50% sedans!

What happened?

Obama administration changed auto fuel efficiency rules to tie fuel economy targets to vehicle size.

Under the new system: -The bigger the car's footprint, the easier the MPG target was. -Light trucks (including SUVs and crossovers) had far lower requirements than passenger cars. -Crossovers were quietly reclassified as "trucks," giving them a huge regulatory advantage.

Instead of building lighter, more efficient cars, automakers simply made everything bigger, and made more trucks and SUVs.

Notice that cars that used to be sedans are now crossovers? They do this so it counts as a light truck - they raise ground clearance, square off the rear for cargo capacity, and meet off-road approach minimums so they get qualified as a light truck. Think Subaru Legacy > Subaru Outback.

As you can see in the chart, it's a LOT easier to meet MPG requirements if your vehicle is classified that way.

So cars got LARGER to meet fuel efficiency goals. The new Honda Civic is 20 inches longer and 4 inches wider than it used to be, about the same size as an old Accord. By making the Civic larger, Honda slightly shifted it into a more favorable regulatory category.

...and smaller cars disappeared. The Honda Fit was a great little car, but would have had to hit 67 MPG in 2026, which would be nearly impossible... so instead, Honda stopped selling them.

So, the only way to make small vehicles now is to make them EV's (Chevy Bolt).

The Slate truck that is all the rage now is only possible because it's an EV... otherwise its footprint would have demanded an overly onerous MPG target.

So in short - Obama era CAFE standards had the opposite of the desired impact: sedans died, vehicles ballooned in size, and America's streets turned into an SUV parking lot.

All thanks to a policy that accidentally incentivized bloat instead of efficiency.

Don't get me started on "cash for clunkers!"

“””


> Basically a “hate on Obama” hit piece. Fucking snore.

Seems a bit disingenuous blaming a president who had heavy opposition from a republican majority for most of his tenure. Doing nothing would also have been frowned upon. Compromises can have unintended consequences but maybe this was the best he could do?


Well, another poster mentioned that the standards were changed in 2008, a time when Obama would have been running for office, not holding office. So OP is completely wrong

Established debugging tools and logging rubric are not suitable for debugging heavily pipelined code. Stack traces, debuggers rely heavily on line based references which are less useful in this style and can make diagnostic practices feel a little clumsy.

The old adage of not writing code so smart you can’t debug it applies here.

Pipelining runs contrary enough to standard imperative patterns. You don’t just need a new mindset to write code this way. You need to think differently about how you structure your code overall and you need different tools.

That’s not to say that doing things a different way isn’t great, but it does come with baggage that you need to be in a position to carry.


These are all valid criticisms of regex

but they’re not an excuse to avoid regex. Similarly git has many warts but there’s no getting around it. Same with CSS

If you want to run with the herd though you need to know these things, even enjoy them.

You can rely on tooling and training wheels like Python VERBOSE but you’re never going to get away from the fact that the “rump” of the population works with them.

Easier to bite the bullet and get practised. I’ve no doubt you have the intellect - you only need be convinced it’s a good use of your time.


I have an emacs macro for this


> Until something makes a profit

The chip makers are making a bundle


Selling shovels in a gold rush.


Selling stakes


Tell that to the bank I work for that just switched to GCP


Simply match the student population one to one with AI and fit the curve as usual


Advertising isn’t the problem. It’s a natural part of discourse and business. The issue is “dishonesty” and “manipulation” and the tolerance of these.

Do we need a way to connect suppliers with consumers? Yes. Do we need an intermediary that acts in bad faith? No we do not.

I would propose the crazy idea that such intermediaries should be at least equally responsible to the consumers as the suppliers.

That would be helpful.


I think he is equating stern copyright notices to somebody making a strong statement about what annoys them. As if to say “so what”, and the boom in “unapproved” 88x31 pics demonstrates this


It sound like a good way to encourage people to buy from properly regulated UK sellers


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: