It can imitate its creator. We reached AGI.

I wanted to believe. But not now.

Is there some new HN with more insightful discussions?

So what are they selling with the 200 dollar subscription? Only a model that has now caught up with their competitor who sells for 1/10 of their price?

Why would they? They want to compete with claude code and that's not possible on a free tier.

how does it compare to cursor or copilot?

Sam got a jawline lift, anyone noticed?

Yes, I've been cataloging the mewing and lookmaxxing progress of hundreds of public figures

Did he? Flipping back and forth between old vs. new photos of him, his facial structure seems roughly the same.

you're using it wrong. change file ending to .txt instead

I can't tell if this is sarcasm or a helpful advice?

It's how you have to do it. The gemini model is excellent, but the implementation/chat environment seems like it was thrown together in a weekend as an afterthought.

You cannot upload a .py file, but if you change the name to "main.txt" you can upload it, and it will automatically treat it as "main.py". Not sure how this hasn't been fixed yet, but it is google so...

Thank you for explaining!

ChatGPT still doesn't support MCP. It really fell behind Google or Anthropic in the last months in most categories. Gemini pro blows o1 pro away.

Metaprompting is the way to go. Also avoid projects attachments as it uses inferior techniques like rag

Matches also my experience that openai fell behind with their deep search product. And that deep search is basically the top tier benchmark for what professionals are willing to pay. So why should i shell out 200 dollar for an openai subscription when google gives me a better top-tier product for 1/10th of the price openai or anthropic are asking. Although i assume google is just more willing to burn cash in order to not let openai take more market share which would get them later on soo more expensive (e.g. iphone market share, also classic microsoft strategy).

It may actually be affordable for Google to charge $20 vs OAI's $200. Google already has an extensive datacenter operation and infrastructure that they're amortizing across many products and services. AI requires significant additions to it, of course, but their economy of scale may make a low monthly sub price viable.

The $20/month Chatgpt subscription has deep research so the comparison should be $20 vs $20, not $20 vs $200.

Gemini Deep Research is available for free, so it's $0 vs $20?