Putting “ai” in the name is a terrible decision, almost seems like a last minute decision to make a premature product marketable in the current climate. Coming from the “ex-Apple” team they call themselves, they should have know better and gone with just “pin”.
Huh, you're right. I tried both names in my head and "The Pin" sounds exactly like an apple product (in a good way), while "The AI Pin" sounds weirdly cheap and gimmicky.
I wonder if “pin” was considered too generic though. Humane Pin also has the awkward formatting of a noun phrase. (a pin that is humane, not that it makes sense really)
Anecdotally, I agree with the conclusions the researchers propose.
From an academic perspective, this study is poorly done, with an abstract that fails to fully encapsulate their findings.
While this is a topic that is very important and deserves the attention,people shouldn’t be mislead into taking this paper at face value.
Is it possible that someone you are unaware of has access to your YouTube account? Sometimes YouTube is wonky with their suggestions, but to this consistency that you stated is irregular without actually consuming that content.
What does your comment even mean? If I were to create an original piece of art of an famous style, would that be considered a “blatant rip-off”? For a sanity check, here’s the website of the artist that created this original illustration: https://janneiivonen.net/about
You mean to say this fraud didn't even design his own site? Regardless, it's clearly ripping off of a well-known art style. Disingenuous to claim "deep, strong branding" when it's simply a cheap imitation. What a joke.
