Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sumone4life's comments login

They still allow you to deploy you just have to explicitly set a variable in the deploy command so they know you are aware whats going on


The point was unless you also previously cached all your gems somewhere you'd have to deploy using potentially compromised gems from rubygems.


Is this safe if you haven't changed any gems since the last deploy? I have a bugfix that I would like to deploy...


Heroku runs bundle install on deploy, so it's not safe until all your gems (and their dependencies in gemfile.lock) are cleared.


they give you a straight forward workaround to still deploy. They just make you set a value explicitly so they know you are aware of the risk.

Good to know someone is watching your back :)


I hardly go on Facebook anymore mostly because of all the advertisements that get interleaved into the news stream. It's definitely a case of, if you don't like it then don't use it. There is no one forcing you to use Facebook and if they have a user base that is willing to put up with an Ad supported experience then so be it. AdBlock helps a lot in keeping at least the right hand ads to a minimum. It's funny going on a friends computer who doesn't have AdBlock and being surprised at the amount of advertising on Facebook. As an aside, I love my Nest thermostat.


Made the switch today because of this, and a few other features and improvements since I last used firefox.


What improvements did you like most?


The developer toolbar mostly. I do a good amount of web dev so its helpful. Taking pdf screenshots with a single command has come in handy. Also the 3D view is gimmicky but pretty awesome. Tab groups is another favorite.

There still seems to be some sort of memory leakage though. I have to shut down the browser every so often to clear out the 3GB of ram it suddenly decided it needed to have.


Can anyone comment on whether buying one of these is worth it and if they've seen any savings?


I haven't directly noticed any savings (although I haven't payed much attention,) but the design, remote access, and general pleasantness of it are well worth it.

They have clearly paid a lot of attention to even the smallest details and if you like that kind of thing, a Nest Thermostat will make you very, very happy.


I like the monthly report too. Being able to adjust both the Nests from the comfort of my couch via the phone app is also a nice feature.


I bought one of these at the beginning of the summer and I definitely noticed a fairly significant savings. In my case I updated from a really old, couldn't-be-programmed, thermostat right to one of these which almost certainly skews the results since any kind of programmable thermostat would have shown a savings.

I live in NJ and work in NYC so during the week I'm only home for a few hours, besides sleeping, and it learned my schedule on its own. When I get home it's just kicked in and started bringing the temperature down and it goes off shortly after I leave.

The only issue I had was during the first setup it mixed up the heater and air conditioning because of my settings. But I just restored and went back through and changed what I selected and all was well.


I got one and my bill went down by about a third. Paid for itself in four months.

I even got a negative bill as my first month was billed on estimated usage. :-)


I bought two of these, and a guy I work with bought one. My co-worker has measured pretty significant savings in his electric bill. I have not, but it's because I just bought this house and installed the Nests pretty soon afterward so I have nothing to compare.


I'm wondering if they provide any meaningful savings vs a cheap programmable thermostat. Putting your HVAC on timers so it runs less will obviously save energy, but can Nest actually do much better than a unit from Home Depot?


Nest has an awesome feature called AirWave.

When you're running the AC, it actually learns how long it can continue to cool by just running the fan due the the lingering coolness of the coils after the compressor has been running. This causes the AC compressor to run less while you're still able to be kept cool, at significant cost savings.

Your standard thermostats currently don't do this.


Well... the really cheap ones are just timers/thermometers. The amount of control you have over it is related to how much you can program it. I used to have one that was very simple: I could set 2 times/temps for the week and 2 for the weekend. It was easy to program but didn't have much smarts. SO on days that I worked form home, it still let it get hotter/colder for my pre-programmed "away" time frame. So I was constantly tweaking it when I was not really away. My new house had some fancier ones that gave me more times/temps to program and I think I could adjust them per day (not just "week" and "weekend") but it was actually overly complicated to program. And some of the fancier ones still cost $150-175 at HD. So at $250, the Nest is not that much more expensive than some of the fancier ones at HD. But you get some much more "smarts" with it. And you get all the cool extra stuff like remote access, monthly usage reports, habit learning, etc.


> I'm wondering if they provide any meaningful savings vs a cheap programmable thermostat.

In my experience, yes. I left town for two weeks and forgot to turn on away mode. If I'd had a cheap one, I'd have paid for two weeks of A/C keeping my house at 72. Instead, I was able to remotely tell it to let the house get up to 85 before kicking in.

Auto-away does the same thing on a smaller scale on a near-daily basis for me, as well. We've got a pretty unsettled schedule, so it's a wonderful feature.


I bought one 3 months ago (damn!) and am very happy with it. I can't say for sure I saved X dollars but between airwave, auto-away and it's easy scheduling (compared to my old, confusing, impossible to understand thermostat) I can't imagine it hasn't saved me at least some money.

But on top of that it looks good in my high traffic hallway. Being in the hallway to my bathroom it acts as a nice night-light (it turns on when I step out of my bedroom to goto the bathroom and visa-versa) and overall has been a joy to work with.


Interesting idea. Instead of simply saying people can't post if their karma is too low you could take the users total Karma relative to 0 and add a sorting feature filter that sorts based that. Only problem is new people would get buried pretty quickly and it may feel like they are trying to get someone's attention from across the room while in the middle of a pack of screaming monkeys. Adding a sort by "new" feature could help new users get their voice heard and voted up or down accordingly. Just a thought.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: