Honestly it's hard to guess what your talking about here. As far as things the administration has used as examples they are pretty much all incorrect (e.x. condoms for Hamas) or wildly distorted so I wouldn't call it a win for transparency, or revealing something "essentially hidden".
If your talking things like their "org chart"* maybe, sort of. There's nothing there that wasn't already available pretty easily via OPM, but one could argue it's a nicer interface. To the extent that it's actually revealed anything to anyone is argue that it has more to do with it being the trending news so people actually bother to look, rather than it being "hidden" before.
Is efficiency of the company the wrong metric in this case? Wouldn’t we rather have a market and prices reflect what it can bare rather than an open tab?
Oh christ you're right, they were actually being really funny. I was being super literal and imagined them being very excited about futuristic advances in giant isopod diagnosis and care
Agree with your first point, but Ev’s are starting to have a impact on local air quality… just because you don’t have one Dosent mean you don’t benefit
Not really, the FOC software that runs on the inverters is compute heavy and safety critical. It gets its own dedicated controller (they are actually running to cpus in parallel in case one fails) and same with the bms. They talk over can currently in teslas. bms states it’s max charge and discharge current, and everything else listens