That reported 26:13 split is incorrect. It was actually 26:33, which is still crazy fast but more in line with the rest of the race.

> his 15km split was initially recorded as 39:47 before it was confirmed after the race as 40:07, improving his own world best.

(5km was 13:34)

https://worldathletics.org/competitions/world-athletics-labe...

https://www.jwz.org/blog/2011/11/watch-a-vc-use-my-name-to-s... doesn't mention HN directly, but will give you a sense of his POV (copy-and-paste the link or you'll get the behavior described up-thread)

That's incorrect though. It stands for 'set', as in 'instruction set' ("reduced instruction set computer").

If you're actually paying a significant cost generating stack traces for NPEs, there's a JVM option to deal with that (-XX:-OmitStackTraceInFastThrow). It still generates a stack trace the first time; if you're able to go search for that first one it shouldn't be a problem for debugging.

So should Protonmail (and any other site with similarly sensitive data) be setting that header, then? It’s probably hard to change the default. I bet some use cases (SSO popups?) depend on it.

It's not unreasonable to set a different header value for the login page only, where it should be safe because no external user data is being rendered.

Sites can also opt into the same behavior by setting the rel="noopener" or alternatively target="_blank" attributes on outgoing links (i.e. <a> tags).

And yes, something like a webmail site should definitely be setting the header, or at lest these attributes for outbound content links.

That is a little different, though: those attributes are for if you're example.com linking to protonmail, the header is for if you're protonmail deciding on security policies for interactions with example.com.

The header works in both directions; cf. the table on https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cr....

if anyone else was similarly confused: a 'Kansan' is someone from the US state of Kansas.

I think the idea is to take advantage of certain legal obligations that are triggered by ownership of any size.

Could you give some examples? I have no idea what legal differences would provide a benefit during customer interactions.

Has nothing to do with legal differences. It's just a different customer service team you end up talking to. It's in the same class of tricks as knowing the precise set of prompts to give to get immediately to a human operator when you call the main line.

I had almost the same experience. Getting 911 by accident was pretty scary at age 6 or so.

> Social Topics

> Discussion boundaries and social issues

> Multiple Viewpoints

> RedNote requires following official stance; TikTok allows diverse viewpoints within platform rules

> Social Debates

> RedNote prohibits controversial topics; TikTok allows constructive debates within guidelines

"TikTok, but more evil and with greater Chinese influence" is not what I would have predict anyone to want from a clone

The above quote is particularly rich when paired with the following fluff, which appears further down the page:

> Authentic Expression

> Experience true freedom of expression

It is a generational / group / identity thing. TikTok users to don’t want to be forced over to Instagram/YouTube.

Also it is an incredibly humorous response.

I'm not sure what you are seeing, but perhaps it's just a login wall. I was able to read it; I'm logged in but have never paid for Twitter or X. X does tend to hide certain things (such as replies and replied-to tweets) if you're not logged in.

I'm already logged in, which I infer is why I didn't see a login wall. Anyhow, I also posted an alternate link.

it's not visible to nitter, which is annoying.