Oh Oh. What to do? Seems Poor Olivia has two sets of rules. One for her and one for David Pakter.

Remember, Poor Olivia got the ball rolling against Mr Pakter for accusing him unjustly for selling watches to students. She then thought that even giving watches to students as an incentive to get good grades was against DOE policy. Mr Pakter's attorney explained to her that there is no such regulation.

But what there is, is an Internet Acceptable Use Policy (click here) that Poor Olivia seems to have run afoul. Specifically Poor Olivia has violated proper Email Usage, specifically:

• Using e-mail services for private commercial or business transactions and any activity meant to foster personal gain.
• Using your DOE e-mail address to subscribe to websites or other internet services that do not conform to your DOE duties and responsibilities.
• Conducting non-Department of Education fund raising or public relations activities such as solicitation for religious and political causes or not-for-profit activities.
• Distributing "junk" mail, such as chain letters, advertisements, or unauthorized solicitations.

The last part of the acceptable use policy as it pertains to acceptable use is; This e-mail Acceptable Use (EAU) applies to all Department of Education (DOE) employees, temporary employees, consultants, contractors, and anyone given access to e-mail via any DOE electronic device, network, or e-mail service owned, provided or maintained by the DOE . Seems Poor Olivia thinks she is above it all. But you ask, how did she violate such terms and conditions?

The crack team here at SBSB has uncovered several newsletters from an exclusive private school that Poor Olivia writes for. Not only is her name on the news letter, but her NYC DOE EMAIL ADDRESS AS WELL. If David Pakter were engaging in such conduct how fast would Poor Olivia rat him out?

Let's have a look see. Or click here and go to page 16 to see for your self.

This clearly is not DOE related. Poor Olivia clearly has violated DOE Acceptable Use Policy.

More to come.

Poor Olivia. Two weeks ago at David Pakter's hearing she testified that a guidance counselor told her that it "seems as if Mr Pakter" was selling watches to students. Notice the key word in the quote, "seems." No according to Websters, seems is defined as; 1 : to appear to the observation or understanding 2 : to give the impression of being

So there we have it. But for some reason in an email to her principal Poor Olivia said, "the guidance counselor said that Mr Pakter is selling watches to students. Key word in that sentence is, "is." According to Websters is is defined as; —used as the auxiliary of the present participle in progressive tenses expressing continuous action (he is reading)(I have been sleeping) or better yet, (he is selling watches to students).

Now after her direct testimony Poor Olivia stood pretty fast by this statement. But in her cross, Poor Olivia completely contradicted herself and folded like a wet noodle. Not only that the very nest day the guidance counselor testified that he never said anything to Poor Olivia.

But there is a major question here. If Poor Olivia was notified of such doings, could she not have saved time and the DOE's money by simply asking Mr Pakter for the truth? In her capacity as an assistant principal she was well within her duties to do so. Why would she need to go right to the principal and involve an investigation?

The reason is because Poor Olivia knows she has no skills. No skills two be an administrator. Like Numb Nuts, she needs to show that feels she needs to suck up to the principal to show she belongs. Why else would a person after only five years in education go right into administration? She is a climber, and damn whomever gets in her way.

There used to be a time when administrators were veteran teachers, teachers that paid their dues over fifteen years or more. Now little these little peon's like Poor Olivia come around and they want to climb up that ladder. But something is missing. The skills to stay atop that ladder. The lack of confidence in their own skills. This is Poor Olivia.

But Poor Olivia did not look up Websters definition of perjury; the voluntary violation of an oath or vow either by swearing to what is untrue or by omission to do what has been promised under oath : false swearing


One would wonder if Poor Olivia ever violated any DOE rules or Chancellor's Regulations. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.