---
abstract: |-
The objective of the research was to answer the
question: What kinds of processes prevail between
molar behavior (verbal and nonverbal) and mind
processes? Data were obtained from a videotaped
program where the participants had no possibilities
to see the stimuli. The number of the subjects was
40. Reliability of observation was assessed in two
ways; from the z-score based correlation matrix and
from the normalized vectors. The statistical
analysis comprised of state vectors of the mind
processes and the conditional matrix powered from 1
to 11. So the analysis was a stochastic process with
a regular matrix. The results indicated the
existence the process system with controls. The
mindamic evolves until the half of the process and
then reaches dynamic equilibrium. A surprise was a
fact; the shape mindition has a greater chance to
transmute into the experientally organized mindition.
So the question is not to fill-in the plain organized
mindition with experiental content. The fact a part
of the former researches showed. At the same time it
was necessary to develop novel concepts for molar
behavior that included both verbal and nonverbal
behaviors. Again the importance of the transmuter
emphasized as an executer
altloc: []
chapter: ~
commentary: ~
commref: ~
confdates: ~
conference: ~
confloc: ~
contact_email: ~
creators_id:
- 06-27-1944-1072
creators_name:
- family: Laasonen
given: Raimo J
honourific: Ed.D.
lineage: ''
date: 1997
date_type: published
datestamp: 2007-02-19
department: ~
dir: disk0/00/00/54/02
edit_lock_since: ~
edit_lock_until: ~
edit_lock_user: ~
editors_id: []
editors_name: []
eprint_status: archive
eprintid: 5402
fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png;/5402/1/Molar_behavior.pdf
full_text_status: public
importid: ~
institution: ~
isbn: ~
ispublished: unpub
issn: ~
item_issues_comment: []
item_issues_count: 0
item_issues_description: []
item_issues_id: []
item_issues_reported_by: []
item_issues_resolved_by: []
item_issues_status: []
item_issues_timestamp: []
item_issues_type: []
keywords: 'non-verbal behavior, verbal behavior,transmuter,molar behavior'
lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:56:46
latitude: ~
longitude: ~
metadata_visibility: show
note: ~
number: ~
pagerange: ~
pubdom: FALSE
publication: ~
publisher: ~
refereed: FALSE
referencetext: |-
Dillon, Jr. (1983). Foundations of general
systems theory. Seaside, CA: Intersystems
Publications.
Fischbach, G. D. (1993).Mind and brain. Readings
from scientific american magazine.(pp. 1-14). New
York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Fisher, R. A., & Yates, F.(1963). Statistical
tables. London: Longman Group Limited.
Gazzaniga, M. S. (1998). The split brain
revisited. Scientific American. 279 (1), 34-
39.
Newcomb, T. M., Turner, R. H., & Converse, P. E.
(1965). Social psychology. London: Routledge
& Kegan Paul LTD.
Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New
York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company
relation_type: []
relation_uri: []
reportno: ~
rev_number: 12
series: ~
source: ~
status_changed: 2007-09-12 17:09:33
subjects:
- behanal
succeeds: ~
suggestions: ~
sword_depositor: ~
sword_slug: ~
thesistype: ~
title: |-
Molar Behavior: Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior
Related to Mind Processes without Vision
type: other
userid: 419
volume: ~