Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure from:Morphometric study of the facial skeleton in Jordanians: A computed tomography scan-based study

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Standardized coefficient = 1, Structure matrix = 1. Univariate direct discriminant function analysis: Canonical discriminant function coefficients and sectioning points in Jordanian population. Table 9

Table 9 Standardized coefficient = 1, Structure matrix = 1. Univariate direct discriminant function analysis: Canonical discriminant function coefficients and sectioning points in Jordanian population. Table 9

Related Figures (13)

Table 1
Table 1
Fig. 1. Frontal view showing the landmarks used in the present study. Dacryon (dr), zygia (zy), zygomaxillare (zm), nasion (n), prosthion (pr), frontotemporalae (ft), coronalia (co), superior orbital margin (so), inferior orbital margin (io), medial orbital margin (mo), lateral orbital margin (lo), infraorbital foramen (iof), anterior nasal spine (ans). See Table 1 for landmark key. (single-column fitting image).
Fig. 1. Frontal view showing the landmarks used in the present study. Dacryon (dr), zygia (zy), zygomaxillare (zm), nasion (n), prosthion (pr), frontotemporalae (ft), coronalia (co), superior orbital margin (so), inferior orbital margin (io), medial orbital margin (mo), lateral orbital margin (lo), infraorbital foramen (iof), anterior nasal spine (ans). See Table 1 for landmark key. (single-column fitting image).
* significant at <0.05, unpaired t test. Table 2
* significant at <0.05, unpaired t test. Table 2
* paired t test. Craniofacial parameters of the Jordanian males and females according to side. Table 3
* paired t test. Craniofacial parameters of the Jordanian males and females according to side. Table 3
Comparisons of the mean changes between the different age groups for each craniofacial parameter. Male: Wilks' Lambda: 0.955, F: 2.12, df: 22, n2: 0.093, p value: 0.002*. Female: Wilks’ Lambda: 0.871, F: 1.60, df: 22, 12:0.067, p value: 0.042*. Table 4
Comparisons of the mean changes between the different age groups for each craniofacial parameter. Male: Wilks' Lambda: 0.955, F: 2.12, df: 22, n2: 0.093, p value: 0.002*. Female: Wilks’ Lambda: 0.871, F: 1.60, df: 22, 12:0.067, p value: 0.042*. Table 4
Multivariate direct discriminant function analysis (dimorphic variables): Canonical discriminant function coefficients & sectioning points in Jordanian population. Table 5
Multivariate direct discriminant function analysis (dimorphic variables): Canonical discriminant function coefficients & sectioning points in Jordanian population. Table 5
Classification results of craniofacial parameters in Jordanian population by multivariate discriminant function analysis (dimorphic variables).
Classification results of craniofacial parameters in Jordanian population by multivariate discriminant function analysis (dimorphic variables).
Stepwise discriminant function analysis: Canonical discriminant function coefficients and sectioning points in Jordanian population.
Stepwise discriminant function analysis: Canonical discriminant function coefficients and sectioning points in Jordanian population.
Classification results of craniofacial parameters in Jordanian population by stepwise discriminant function analysis.
Classification results of craniofacial parameters in Jordanian population by stepwise discriminant function analysis.
Classification results of craniofacial parameters in Jordanian population by univariate discriminant function analysis. Table 10
Classification results of craniofacial parameters in Jordanian population by univariate discriminant function analysis. Table 10
Multivariate direct discriminant function analysis (9 variables): Canonical discriminant functions according to age. Table 11
Multivariate direct discriminant function analysis (9 variables): Canonical discriminant functions according to age. Table 11
Multivariate direct discriminant function analysis (9 variables): Canonical discriminant function coefficients & sectioning points in Jordanian population Table 12
Multivariate direct discriminant function analysis (9 variables): Canonical discriminant function coefficients & sectioning points in Jordanian population Table 12
Classification results of craniofacial parameters in Jordanian population by multivariate discriminant function analysis (9 variables). Table 13
Classification results of craniofacial parameters in Jordanian population by multivariate discriminant function analysis (9 variables). Table 13
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved