Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure from:Lip Print Analysis in Malaysian Chinese Population (Klang Valley): LipstickCellophane Tape Technique

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
TABLE 5S: Percentage of lip print pattern in different sections between male and female This was the first research with bigger size sample for Malaysian Chinese population therefore the results could be useful for tentative identification process in forensic science. Therefore, careful assessment of lip print pattern can be suggested for gender differentiation among Malaysian Chinese population in Klang Valley. Further study should be conducted to validate these results. Using stereomicroscope instead of magnifying glass is recommended for better visual of the lip print. lifting the lip print, however, Durbakula and Neo had less than 50 subjects as compared to 412 subjects studied in the current study. Bindal (Bindal et al. 2009), Manipady (Manipady 2001-2002), Gondivkar (Gondivkar et al. 2009) and Wan Rafiuddin (Wan Rafiuddin et al. 2018) agreed that type II was the dominant lip print pattern, however, Bindal and Gondivkar explored the Indian population, while Wan Rafiuddin studied Malaysian Malays and Manipady’s project involved both Indian and Chinese origin subjects. All of them however similarly used the lipstick-cellophane tape technique and Suzuki and Tsuchihashi classification.

Table 5 S: Percentage of lip print pattern in different sections between male and female This was the first research with bigger size sample for Malaysian Chinese population therefore the results could be useful for tentative identification process in forensic science. Therefore, careful assessment of lip print pattern can be suggested for gender differentiation among Malaysian Chinese population in Klang Valley. Further study should be conducted to validate these results. Using stereomicroscope instead of magnifying glass is recommended for better visual of the lip print. lifting the lip print, however, Durbakula and Neo had less than 50 subjects as compared to 412 subjects studied in the current study. Bindal (Bindal et al. 2009), Manipady (Manipady 2001-2002), Gondivkar (Gondivkar et al. 2009) and Wan Rafiuddin (Wan Rafiuddin et al. 2018) agreed that type II was the dominant lip print pattern, however, Bindal and Gondivkar explored the Indian population, while Wan Rafiuddin studied Malaysian Malays and Manipady’s project involved both Indian and Chinese origin subjects. All of them however similarly used the lipstick-cellophane tape technique and Suzuki and Tsuchihashi classification.

Related Figures (5)

TABLE 1: Comparison of cheiloscopy studies from previous researches and the result from the current stud}
TABLE 1: Comparison of cheiloscopy studies from previous researches and the result from the current stud}
FIGURE 1:The six topography area of the lips named accordingly from left to right as upper left section (UL), upper middle section (UM), upper right section (UR), lower left section (LL), lower middle section (LM) and lower right section (LR) (Nur Sabrina Sarah et al. 2019) The results showed that type II was the dominant type for four sections: upper left, upper right, lower right and Table 5 shows percentages of lip print pattern in different section between males and females. For the upper left section, females showed higher percentage of lip print
FIGURE 1:The six topography area of the lips named accordingly from left to right as upper left section (UL), upper middle section (UM), upper right section (UR), lower left section (LL), lower middle section (LM) and lower right section (LR) (Nur Sabrina Sarah et al. 2019) The results showed that type II was the dominant type for four sections: upper left, upper right, lower right and Table 5 shows percentages of lip print pattern in different section between males and females. For the upper left section, females showed higher percentage of lip print
TABLE 2: Percentage distribution of lip print pattern in Malaysian Chinese population
TABLE 2: Percentage distribution of lip print pattern in Malaysian Chinese population
TABLE 4: Pearson chi-square test result
TABLE 4: Pearson chi-square test result
TABLE 3: Percentage of lip print pattern distribution in each section between male and female
TABLE 3: Percentage of lip print pattern distribution in each section between male and female
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved