hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Frederick H. Dyer, Compendium of the War of the Rebellion: Regimental Histories 23 23 Browse Search
Thomas Wentworth Higginson, Massachusetts in the Army and Navy during the war of 1861-1865, vol. 2 15 15 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 4. (ed. Frank Moore) 5 5 Browse Search
The Daily Dispatch: February 11, 1862., [Electronic resource] 4 4 Browse Search
Thomas Wentworth Higginson, Massachusetts in the Army and Navy during the war of 1861-1865, vol. 1, Mass. officers and men who died. 4 4 Browse Search
James Barnes, author of David G. Farragut, Naval Actions of 1812, Yank ee Ships and Yankee Sailors, Commodore Bainbridge , The Blockaders, and other naval and historical works, The Photographic History of The Civil War: in ten volumes, Thousands of Scenes Photographed 1861-65, with Text by many Special Authorities, Volume 6: The Navy. (ed. Francis Trevelyan Miller) 3 3 Browse Search
A Roster of General Officers , Heads of Departments, Senators, Representatives , Military Organizations, &c., &c., in Confederate Service during the War between the States. (ed. Charles C. Jones, Jr. Late Lieut. Colonel of Artillery, C. S. A.) 3 3 Browse Search
The Daily Dispatch: February 15, 1862., [Electronic resource] 3 3 Browse Search
The Daily Dispatch: March 15, 1862., [Electronic resource] 3 3 Browse Search
The Daily Dispatch: August 21, 1863., [Electronic resource] 2 2 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: August 21, 1863., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for February 10th, 1862 AD or search for February 10th, 1862 AD in all documents.

Your search returned 2 results in 1 document section:

The Daily Dispatch: August 21, 1863., [Electronic resource], The militia decision in Petersburg. (search)
until "mustered into service." "That," in the language of the Court in that case, "is the terminus a quo the service, the pay, and subjection to the articles of war, are to commence and continue, " pp. 17, 30. And so the act of assembly of February 10, 1862, providing for raising troops to meet the requisition on Virginia, clearly contemplated the mustering into the service of the Confederate States as the means by which the troops were to be turned over to that Government--11: The same is true act, so as to exempt the petitioner from service under that act, is a question not before me. The claim of this petitioner, therefore, does not depend upon the act of February 5, 1863. It must rest upon the 11th section of the act of February 10, 1862, under the authority of which the substitute was furnished, by which the party furnishing the substitute remains liable to "ordinary militia duty." If it were necessary to determine the effect of that reservation of service, I should ho