hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Frederick H. Dyer, Compendium of the War of the Rebellion: Regimental Histories 156 0 Browse Search
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 2. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.) 33 1 Browse Search
The Daily Dispatch: June 10, 1862., [Electronic resource] 32 2 Browse Search
William Swinton, Campaigns of the Army of the Potomac 31 1 Browse Search
William F. Fox, Lt. Col. U. S. V., Regimental Losses in the American Civil War, 1861-1865: A Treatise on the extent and nature of the mortuary losses in the Union regiments, with full and exhaustive statistics compiled from the official records on file in the state military bureaus and at Washington 30 0 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 13. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 28 0 Browse Search
An English Combatant, Lieutenant of Artillery of the Field Staff., Battlefields of the South from Bull Run to Fredericksburgh; with sketches of Confederate commanders, and gossip of the camps. 26 2 Browse Search
General James Longstreet, From Manassas to Appomattox 23 1 Browse Search
D. H. Hill, Jr., Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 4, North Carolina (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 23 1 Browse Search
Waitt, Ernest Linden, History of the Nineteenth regiment, Massachusetts volunteer infantry , 1861-1865 8 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: July 5, 1862., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for Casey or search for Casey in all documents.

Your search returned 2 results in 1 document section:

The Daily Dispatch: July 5, 1862., [Electronic resource], The battle of the 23th of June. (search)
een all sent in. I think they will exhibit some considerable discrepancies, and lead probably to some controversies which I trust may be postponed, at least until this army has accomplished its work. It will be contended, on the one side, that Gen. Casey allowed himself, through Jack of proper precautions, to be surprised, and that neither this division nor that of Gen. Couch sustained the shock of attack with sufficient steadiness and firmness. Very serious imputations upon the courage of theribed by a radius two miles long, with his own headpuarters as a centre. The very next day the attack was made — the enemy sending out no skirmishers, but driving in our pickets, and falling instantly on masse upon the front and both flanks of Gen. Casey's command. This attack was prepared for and was intended to have been made on Friday, as we learn from the Richmond correspondence of the Southern papers. The troops were brought forward and disposed for it. Why it was postponed we are no