hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Matching Documents
The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.
Document | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 2. | 8 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 3. | 5 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Owen Wister, Ulysses S. Grant | 4 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 2. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) | 3 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 1. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.) | 2 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 3. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) | 1 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 1 | 1 | 1 | Browse | Search |
View all matching documents... |
Browsing named entities in Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 2. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones). You can also browse the collection for Henry Coppee or search for Henry Coppee in all documents.
Your search returned 2 results in 2 document sections:
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 2. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), A foreign view of the civil War in America . (search)
A foreign view of the civil War in America.
[The following review from the facile pen of Mr. W. Baird, of Essex Co., Virginia, is important as pointing out some of the errors of a book which is being widely circulated, and which some of our Southern papers even have warmly commended without reading].
History of the civil War in America. By the Comte de Paris.
Translated, with the approval of the Author, by Louis F. Tasistro.
Edited by Henry Coppee, Ll. D. Volume I. Philadelphia: Joseph H. Coates & Co. 1875.
It would be absurdly extravagant praise to say of this bulky volume, what was said with such pointed severity of the reply to Bentley, published under the name of Boyle, in the once famous controversy concerning the letters of Phalaris, that it was the best book ever written by any man upon the wrong side of a question of which he was profoundly ignorant.
It would, indeed, be much nearer the truth, strong as such language certainly is, to pronounce it the worst book ev
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 2. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), chapter 6.34 (search)