hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Horace Greeley, The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States of America, 1860-65: its Causes, Incidents, and Results: Intended to exhibit especially its moral and political phases with the drift and progress of American opinion respecting human slavery from 1776 to the close of the War for the Union. Volume I. 26 0 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 10. (ed. Frank Moore) 22 18 Browse Search
The Daily Dispatch: April 1, 1862., [Electronic resource] 9 5 Browse Search
The Daily Dispatch: December 25, 1860., [Electronic resource] 7 1 Browse Search
The Daily Dispatch: December 14, 1865., [Electronic resource] 7 3 Browse Search
Horace Greeley, The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States of America, 1860-65: its Causes, Incidents, and Results: Intended to exhibit especially its moral and political phases with the drift and progress of American opinion respecting human slavery from 1776 to the close of the War for the Union. Volume II. 7 1 Browse Search
Lucius R. Paige, History of Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1630-1877, with a genealogical register 6 0 Browse Search
The Daily Dispatch: December 28, 1860., [Electronic resource] 5 1 Browse Search
The Daily Dispatch: April 30, 1862., [Electronic resource] 4 0 Browse Search
The Daily Dispatch: December 21, 1865., [Electronic resource] 4 2 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 10. (ed. Frank Moore). You can also browse the collection for Doolittle or search for Doolittle in all documents.

Your search returned 20 results in 1 document section:

Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 10. (ed. Frank Moore), chapter 1 (search)
n of the amendment, and it was withdrawn. Mr. Doolittle thought some provision ought to be insertes inadequate to the needs of the service. Mr. Doolittle desired some limitation upon the number. ommander; and the amendment was agreed to. Mr. Doolittle suggested that the bill lie over, there wa may be found competent. After remarks by Mr. Doolittle, of Wisconsin, and Mr. Hale, of New-Hampshan's original amendment was agreed to, and Mr. Doolittle proposed to add a new section, reducing thndler, Clark, Collamer, Cowan, Davis, Dixon, Doolittle, Fessenden, Foot, Foster, Harlan, Harris, He lost — yeas, sixteen; nays, twenty-eight. Mr. Doolittle desired to amend the bill so as to make peith, Mr. Lane, of Indiana, Mr. Richardson, Mr. Doolittle, and Mr. McDougall. The vote was then takted by Mr. Brown, and Mr. Lane, of Kansas. Mr. Doolittle moved to amend Mr. Brown's amendment by suthe yeas and nays, and they were ordered. Mr. Doolittle would vote to refer it to the Judiciary Co[10 more...]