hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Matching Documents
The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.
Document | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 7. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) | 6 | 0 | Browse | Search |
The Daily Dispatch: August 27, 1863., [Electronic resource] | 5 | 5 | Browse | Search |
The Daily Dispatch: December 16, 1863., [Electronic resource] | 4 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Thomas Wentworth Higginson, Women and Men | 2 | 0 | Browse | Search |
The Daily Dispatch: March 29, 1861., [Electronic resource] | 2 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 11. (ed. Frank Moore) | 2 | 0 | Browse | Search |
The Daily Dispatch: January 5, 1861., [Electronic resource] | 2 | 0 | Browse | Search |
The Daily Dispatch: December 29, 1865., [Electronic resource] | 2 | 2 | Browse | Search |
The Daily Dispatch: October 11, 1861., [Electronic resource] | 2 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Edward Porter Alexander, Military memoirs of a Confederate: a critical narrative | 2 | 0 | Browse | Search |
View all matching documents... |
Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: October 18, 1862., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for Nance or search for Nance in all documents.
Your search returned 1 result in 1 document section:
The Daily Dispatch: October 18, 1862., [Electronic resource], Proceedings in the courts. (search)
Proceedings in the courts. Hustings Court, Oct. 17th.
--Present; Richard D. Sanzay, Senior Alderman; Jas. Bray., W. W. Timbericke, Chas, E Anderson and Geo. N. Gwathmeye, Aldermen:
Yesterday was devoted by the Court to the hearing of pleadings on the motion submitted by Messrs, Sands and Nance, to quash the rule leads against Casper Marston and other members of the Richmond Typographical Society, to show stress why an information should not be filed against them for conspiring together as printers to extort of John M. Daniel, proprietor of the paper.
Counsel for defendants concluded that the presentment made against the Parisians and can thrown out of Court by nolle prosequi in the first instance, because of some informality.
The Commonwealth's Attorney could not elect of his commotion to continue the prosecution by information, but must go back and have a new indictment found.
This view of the was opposed by Mr. Gilmer, for the prosecution who rent many authorit