hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Matching Documents
The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.
Your search returned 19 results in 6 document sections:
The Daily Dispatch: December 4, 1860., [Electronic resource], Succession movement at the South . (search)
Arrests.
--Lorenzo W. Frazier, arrested on a warrant charging him with entering the law office of John N. Davis and E. E. Orvis and stealing wearing apparel and other articles, has been balled to appear at Court to-day.--Several individuals, white and black, were taken into custody Saturday for getting "tightly slight," and other offences of minor sort.
The Daily Dispatch: November 20, 1863., [Electronic resource], Advance of the Yankees in the Valley . (search)
The Daily Dispatch: November 24, 1863., [Electronic resource], Official Dispatch from Knoxville . (search)
C. S. District Court.
--Judge Halyburton, at the session of his Court yesterday, gave his opinion in the habeas corpus case of the Rev. E. E. Orvis, the facts in which we have heretofore published.
He decided that the reverend gentleman was not liable to military duty, notwithstanding the fact that he had been employed by Mr. Allen as a substitute for the war, and therefore discharged him.
Another case, which occupied the attention of the Court yesterday, was that of W. A. Bass, who had applied to be discharged from military service.
Mr. Bass, in 1862, was exempt from military duty because of being an employee in the Examiner newspaper office.
Some short time after he quit the Examiner, sought employment in the Danville Railroad Company's office, and afterwards left there and obtained exemption in the Enquirer office.
After getting an exemption in the last office, he was reported to the Conscript Bureau as having left the railroad without being discharged.
The letter of
Substitution--Rev. E. E. Orvis.
--We have received a letter from the above named gentleman, in explanation of his appearance before Judge Halyburton, on the 17th inst., on a writ of habeas corpus,"asking to be discharged from military service," which we append.
Mr. O. says:
"The contract which I, in perfect good faith, entered into with Fayette Allen and the Government I have fulfilled to the very letter.
No man can truthfully say that I have failed in the slightest particular in my duty to either.
Mr. Allen received his exemption " for the war." Would it not be a violation of the faith of the Government to ignore the validity of that exemption, secured by a strict compliance with the law, on his part?
I was mustered into the service in his place "for the war, unless sooner discharged." Such are the terms of the enlistment.
Am I to blame that I was sooner discharged, when that discharge was not at my instance?
And after performing faithfully and conscientiously every