hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
W. J. Hardee 426 0 Browse Search
Cleburne 334 18 Browse Search
W. T. Sherman 301 1 Browse Search
R. E. Lee 278 0 Browse Search
J. B. Hood 267 1 Browse Search
Atlanta (Georgia, United States) 182 2 Browse Search
A. P. Hill 175 31 Browse Search
J. Longstreet 148 0 Browse Search
William J. Hardee 145 1 Browse Search
Gettysburg (Pennsylvania, United States) 143 7 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 8. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones). Search the whole document.

Found 87 total hits in 43 results.

1 2 3 4 5
Gettysburg (Pennsylvania, United States) (search for this): chapter 4.39
y that he had received the published copy of the report and that it was substantially correct. 3. Colonel Charles Marshall, General Lee's Military Secretary, stated that he had lent Mr. Swinton the original rough draft of the report from which a copy had been made for General Lee, and which was the same as that published in the Historical Magazine. 4. The copy from which we printed was a Ms. found among the papers of Michael Kelly, who was a clerk in General Cooper's office, and was identical with the copy printed in the Historical Magazine (and afterwards reprinted in the Southern Magazine, Baltimore, for August 1872). except that it corrected several verbal errors, and added several paragraphs at the close in reference to the conduct of our officers and men and our captures at Gettysburg. Our Ms. is evidently a copy of the finally corrected report of General Lee, and its authenticity seems to us beyond all doubt. We have not space, nor is it necessary, to make any comment.
Baltimore, Md. (Maryland, United States) (search for this): chapter 4.39
be read and studied as a fine portrayal of the character of the noblest man who ever trod this continent. These books are all published by John Murphy & Co., Baltimore, to whom we are indebted for copies, and in paper, type, binding, etc., are beautiful specimens of the book-maker's art. Miss Mason has been generously devoting s in the volume equally worthy. The book is published by subscription, and may be had by sending the price ($1.50) to Miss K. M. Rowland, 225 Freemont street, Baltimore. Life and letters of Admiral D. G. Farragut. By his son Loyall Farragut. New York: D. Appleton & Co. This book, in its type, paper, binding, steel engho was a clerk in General Cooper's office, and was identical with the copy printed in the Historical Magazine (and afterwards reprinted in the Southern Magazine, Baltimore, for August 1872). except that it corrected several verbal errors, and added several paragraphs at the close in reference to the conduct of our officers and men
Maryland (Maryland, United States) (search for this): chapter 4.39
deeply regretting that any son of the South should have brought himself to draw his sword against the land of his birth, yet it is a source of a certain sort of pride that the North was compelled to bestow her highest naval honors on this Southron, while she owed so much of her success in the field to Winfield Scott, George H. Thomas, Canby, Blair, Sykes, Ord, Getty, Anderson, Alexander, Nelson, and other Southern officers, and the 400,000 Southern born men (chiefly from Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland, West Virginia and Tennessee), not counting the negroes, who served in her ranks. How different the result might have been if all these had been true to their section and the principles of their fathers! General Longstreet's paper in the Philadelphia times of March 13th in reply to Generals A. L. Long and Fitz. Lee will excite attention and elicit wile comment. We make here no criticism upon the article, and express no opinion upon the merits of the questions at issue. But there
West Virginia (West Virginia, United States) (search for this): chapter 4.39
ting that any son of the South should have brought himself to draw his sword against the land of his birth, yet it is a source of a certain sort of pride that the North was compelled to bestow her highest naval honors on this Southron, while she owed so much of her success in the field to Winfield Scott, George H. Thomas, Canby, Blair, Sykes, Ord, Getty, Anderson, Alexander, Nelson, and other Southern officers, and the 400,000 Southern born men (chiefly from Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland, West Virginia and Tennessee), not counting the negroes, who served in her ranks. How different the result might have been if all these had been true to their section and the principles of their fathers! General Longstreet's paper in the Philadelphia times of March 13th in reply to Generals A. L. Long and Fitz. Lee will excite attention and elicit wile comment. We make here no criticism upon the article, and express no opinion upon the merits of the questions at issue. But there is one state
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) (search for this): chapter 4.39
; and, if it can hardly be said of his lyrics that each was polished as the bosom of a star, still the light irradiating them seldom failed to be light from the heaven of a true inspiration. The Virginians of the Valley and Little Giffen of Tennessee, have long taken their places among the standard poems that will live, and we hesitate not to declare that there other gems in the volume equally worthy. The book is published by subscription, and may be had by sending the price ($1.50) to Msuccess in the field to Winfield Scott, George H. Thomas, Canby, Blair, Sykes, Ord, Getty, Anderson, Alexander, Nelson, and other Southern officers, and the 400,000 Southern born men (chiefly from Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland, West Virginia and Tennessee), not counting the negroes, who served in her ranks. How different the result might have been if all these had been true to their section and the principles of their fathers! General Longstreet's paper in the Philadelphia times of March
Kentucky (Kentucky, United States) (search for this): chapter 4.39
And while deeply regretting that any son of the South should have brought himself to draw his sword against the land of his birth, yet it is a source of a certain sort of pride that the North was compelled to bestow her highest naval honors on this Southron, while she owed so much of her success in the field to Winfield Scott, George H. Thomas, Canby, Blair, Sykes, Ord, Getty, Anderson, Alexander, Nelson, and other Southern officers, and the 400,000 Southern born men (chiefly from Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland, West Virginia and Tennessee), not counting the negroes, who served in her ranks. How different the result might have been if all these had been true to their section and the principles of their fathers! General Longstreet's paper in the Philadelphia times of March 13th in reply to Generals A. L. Long and Fitz. Lee will excite attention and elicit wile comment. We make here no criticism upon the article, and express no opinion upon the merits of the questions at issue.
Missouri (Missouri, United States) (search for this): chapter 4.39
indness. And while deeply regretting that any son of the South should have brought himself to draw his sword against the land of his birth, yet it is a source of a certain sort of pride that the North was compelled to bestow her highest naval honors on this Southron, while she owed so much of her success in the field to Winfield Scott, George H. Thomas, Canby, Blair, Sykes, Ord, Getty, Anderson, Alexander, Nelson, and other Southern officers, and the 400,000 Southern born men (chiefly from Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland, West Virginia and Tennessee), not counting the negroes, who served in her ranks. How different the result might have been if all these had been true to their section and the principles of their fathers! General Longstreet's paper in the Philadelphia times of March 13th in reply to Generals A. L. Long and Fitz. Lee will excite attention and elicit wile comment. We make here no criticism upon the article, and express no opinion upon the merits of the questions at
Burns (search for this): chapter 4.39
k is very carefully and skillfully edited by the accomplished lady who has done the work and modestly withholds her name. The publishers have performed their part admirably, and thousands who have admired and wept over Ticknor's sweet poems that have appeared from tile to time in the newspapers, will rejoice to have these and others never before published collected together in this beautiful volume. Paul H. Hayne — himself no mean authority — concludes his admirable introductory by saying; Burns, himself, was not more direct, more transparently honest in his metrical appeals than Ticknor. There are no fantastic conceits, no farfetched similes, no dillettanteism of any sort in his verses. The man's soul-sturdy yet gentle, stalwart yet touched by a feminine sweetness-- informed them always; and, if it can hardly be said of his lyrics that each was polished as the bosom of a star, still the light irradiating them seldom failed to be light from the heaven of a true inspiration. Th
Michael Kelly (search for this): chapter 4.39
ine, New York. 2. In April, 1869, General Lee told General Early that he had received the published copy of the report and that it was substantially correct. 3. Colonel Charles Marshall, General Lee's Military Secretary, stated that he had lent Mr. Swinton the original rough draft of the report from which a copy had been made for General Lee, and which was the same as that published in the Historical Magazine. 4. The copy from which we printed was a Ms. found among the papers of Michael Kelly, who was a clerk in General Cooper's office, and was identical with the copy printed in the Historical Magazine (and afterwards reprinted in the Southern Magazine, Baltimore, for August 1872). except that it corrected several verbal errors, and added several paragraphs at the close in reference to the conduct of our officers and men and our captures at Gettysburg. Our Ms. is evidently a copy of the finally corrected report of General Lee, and its authenticity seems to us beyond all doub
E. V. Mason (search for this): chapter 4.39
, and his noble fortitude in defeat and disaster. That you who are most jealous of his fame should honor me with your approval, leads me to hope for the like indulgence from the American people, to whose history he belongs. E. V. Mason. Miss Mason is an exceedingly clever writer, and has used her material with a skill and good taste which makes her book exceedingly interesting and very valuable as a picture of the inner life of our grand old Chieftain. The whole range of ancient or modecharacter of the noblest man who ever trod this continent. These books are all published by John Murphy & Co., Baltimore, to whom we are indebted for copies, and in paper, type, binding, etc., are beautiful specimens of the book-maker's art. Miss Mason has been generously devoting the proceeds of their sale to the education of the daughters of Conlederate soldiers, and this, in addition to their real merits, ought to secure for them a wide and continuing sale. They may be ordered directly fr
1 2 3 4 5