hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 28 0 Browse Search
Polly 24 0 Browse Search
West Virginia (West Virginia, United States) 16 0 Browse Search
John B. Floyd 14 0 Browse Search
Mansfield Lovell 11 1 Browse Search
Stuart (Virginia, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
Jacob Rice 10 0 Browse Search
Rosencranz 10 0 Browse Search
Greenbrier (West Virginia, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
Arthur Simpson 10 2 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: October 12, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 10 total hits in 5 results.

Wise (search for this): article 29
ation to alleged libels made upon him by correspondents of that journal. We subjoin the reply of the editors, published is the Enquirer, of yesterday, with their comments appended: Enquirer Office, Oct. 10, 1861. John B. Floyd, Esq; Sir: --Your letter of October 6th, 1861, is before us. Not recognizing any authority in yourself, either individually or as commander of the Army of Kanawha, to demand the names of our correspondents, we decline to comply with your request. Tyler, Wise & Alleger. We declined to furnish the names of our correspondents to Gen. Floyd, because of his purpose to seek his vindication through a court-martial, instead of the usual mode among gentlemen. Whenever Gen. Floyd proposes a personal vindication, the names of our correspondents shall be furnished. We shall dismiss this letter with the statement that the characters of our correspondents have never been stained by the suspicion of a crime, and that a charge of falsehood agains
John B. Floyd (search for this): article 29
Gen. Floyd and the Enquirer. --We published on yesterday the letter of Gen. Floyd to the Editors of the Enquirer, in relation to alleged libels made upon him byGen. Floyd to the Editors of the Enquirer, in relation to alleged libels made upon him by correspondents of that journal. We subjoin the reply of the editors, published is the Enquirer, of yesterday, with their comments appended: Enquirer Office, Oct. 10, 1861. John B. Floyd, Esq; Sir: --Your letter of October 6th, 1861, is before us. Not recognizing any authority in yourself, either individually or as Alleger. We declined to furnish the names of our correspondents to Gen. Floyd, because of his purpose to seek his vindication through a court-martial, instead of the usual mode among gentlemen. Whenever Gen. Floyd proposes a personal vindication, the names of our correspondents shall be furnished. We shall dismissainst them is much easier made than proved. They are gentlemen the equals of Gen. Floyd in every respect, and what they have averred in their communications we belie
Tyler (search for this): article 29
in relation to alleged libels made upon him by correspondents of that journal. We subjoin the reply of the editors, published is the Enquirer, of yesterday, with their comments appended: Enquirer Office, Oct. 10, 1861. John B. Floyd, Esq; Sir: --Your letter of October 6th, 1861, is before us. Not recognizing any authority in yourself, either individually or as commander of the Army of Kanawha, to demand the names of our correspondents, we decline to comply with your request. Tyler, Wise & Alleger. We declined to furnish the names of our correspondents to Gen. Floyd, because of his purpose to seek his vindication through a court-martial, instead of the usual mode among gentlemen. Whenever Gen. Floyd proposes a personal vindication, the names of our correspondents shall be furnished. We shall dismiss this letter with the statement that the characters of our correspondents have never been stained by the suspicion of a crime, and that a charge of falsehood
October 6th, 1861 AD (search for this): article 29
Gen. Floyd and the Enquirer. --We published on yesterday the letter of Gen. Floyd to the Editors of the Enquirer, in relation to alleged libels made upon him by correspondents of that journal. We subjoin the reply of the editors, published is the Enquirer, of yesterday, with their comments appended: Enquirer Office, Oct. 10, 1861. John B. Floyd, Esq; Sir: --Your letter of October 6th, 1861, is before us. Not recognizing any authority in yourself, either individually or as commander of the Army of Kanawha, to demand the names of our correspondents, we decline to comply with your request. Tyler, Wise & Alleger. We declined to furnish the names of our correspondents to Gen. Floyd, because of his purpose to seek his vindication through a court-martial, instead of the usual mode among gentlemen. Whenever Gen. Floyd proposes a personal vindication, the names of our correspondents shall be furnished. We shall dismiss this letter with the statement that t
October 10th, 1861 AD (search for this): article 29
Gen. Floyd and the Enquirer. --We published on yesterday the letter of Gen. Floyd to the Editors of the Enquirer, in relation to alleged libels made upon him by correspondents of that journal. We subjoin the reply of the editors, published is the Enquirer, of yesterday, with their comments appended: Enquirer Office, Oct. 10, 1861. John B. Floyd, Esq; Sir: --Your letter of October 6th, 1861, is before us. Not recognizing any authority in yourself, either individually or as commander of the Army of Kanawha, to demand the names of our correspondents, we decline to comply with your request. Tyler, Wise & Alleger. We declined to furnish the names of our correspondents to Gen. Floyd, because of his purpose to seek his vindication through a court-martial, instead of the usual mode among gentlemen. Whenever Gen. Floyd proposes a personal vindication, the names of our correspondents shall be furnished. We shall dismiss this letter with the statement that t