Success Academy Legal Memorandum To U.S. DOE
Success Academy Legal Memorandum To U.S. DOE
TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Nadya Dabby, Associate Assistant Deputy Secretary Office of Innovation and Improvement United States Department of Education Emily A. Kim, Chief Legal Officer Success Academy Charter Schools April 20, 2013 English Language Learners Admissions Lottery Preference
The United States Department of Education (the U.S. DOE) has recently informed Success Academy Charter Schools (Success Academy) that Success Academys admissions lottery preference for English Language Learners (ELLs) does not comply with Charter Schools Program (CSP) funding requirements. Success Academy applies an ELL set-aside in its admissions lotteries for two reasons. First, the ELL set-aside is necessary to comply with state law. Second, critical to Success Academys core mission is the ability to provide a world-class education to vulnerable student populations in New York City, including English Language Learners. Abandoning the ELL preference would detrimentally and significantly affect Success Academys ability to reach and serve ELLs. On the other hand, losing millions of dollars in CSP funding would have devastating consequences most of all for Success Academys at-risk student populations, including ELLs, who require the extra resources and robust programming CSP funding enables Success Academy schools to offer. Success Academy thus finds itself in an utterly untenable position. Moreover, Success Academy has been entirely transparent with the U.S. DOE regarding its ELL lottery preference, explicitly setting forth the preference in all of its CSP grant applications. The U.S. DOE awarded Success Academy CSP funding and disbursed such funding to Success Academy over several years without once raising an objection with respect to the ELL preference. Success Academy has thus never had notice until now (three years later, and on the eve of its annual admissions lottery) that the U.S. DOE disagreed with the ELL preference. Success Academy respectfully requests that the U.S. DOE reconsider its determination, as both the law and the facts support such an outcome, as described further below.
I.
Success
Academy
Charter
Schools
serve
approximately
4,500
students
in
15
high-performing
public
charter
schools
across
New
York
City
(12
elementary
schools
and
three
middle
schools).
Their
student
population
is
comprised
principally
of
low-income
and
minority
students.
On
the
New
York
statewide
tests,
students
attending
Success
Academys
first
four
public
charter
schools
in
Harlem
(the
only
four
schools
that
have
reached
state
testing
grades1)
have
consistently
outperformed
significantly
more
affluent
communities,
including
the
Upper
East
and
Upper
West
Sides
of
Manhattan
and
the
affluent
New
York
suburb
of
Scarsdale.2
In
2012,
these
Success
Academy
schools
ranked
among
the
top
1%
of
all
public
elementary/middle
schools
citywide.3
Internal
assessments
of
Success
Academys
other
schools
indicate
that
they
are
poised
for
similarly
extraordinary
student
achievement
outcomes.
In
September
2012,
the
U.S.
DOE
named
Success
Academy
Charter
School
Harlem
1
as
a
national
Blue
Ribbon
School,
the
U.S.
DOEs
highest
honor.
This
honor
has
never
before
been
awarded
to
an
elementary
school
in
Central
Harlem.4
B.
New
York
Charter
Schools
Act:
Enrollment
Targets
In
2010,
the
New
York
state
legislature
amended
the
New
York
Charter
Schools
Act
(the
Act)
to,
among
other
things,
add
a
requirement
that
charter
schools
meet
or
exceed
enrollment
and
retention
targets
for
ELLs.
N.Y.
Educ.
Law
2852(9-a)(b)(i).
The
target
ELL
figures
must
be
comparable
to
the
enrollment
figures
of
the
surrounding
school
district
or,
in
the
case
of
New
York
City,
community
school
district.
Id.
The
amended
Act
further
established
that
charters
could
be
terminated
or
not
renewed
for
repeated
failure
to
comply
with
the
mandated
targets.
Id.
2852(9-a)(b)(i);
2855(1)(e);
2851(4)(e).
Success
Academys
charter
authorizer,
the
State
University
of
New
York
(SUNY),
has
recognized
the
significant
challenges
that
New
York
public
charter
1
Success Academy schools open with kindergarten and first grades, and expand one grade upward each year as their scholars advance to the next grade. New York statewide testing begins in third grade. 2 Based on New York State exam results database, available at http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/ela-math/. 3 See http://schools.nyc.gov/Accountability/tools/report/default.htm#Citywide. 4 See http://www2.ed.gov/programs/nclbbrs/index.html.
schools face in striving to achieve the statutorily mandated ELL targets. For example, as SUNY has acknowledged, ELL populations are not evenly distributed throughout New York, but often concentrate in discrete areas. The resulting ELL enrollment and retention rates across New Yorkand particularly New York City vary widely, sometimes even within the same district or community school district. As a result, public charter schools located outside of areas with high concentrations of ELL populations find it very challenging to meet the targets. At the same time, public charter schools have limited methods available to them to increase their ELL populations, given that admissions are dictated by a randomized lottery.5 However, the Act provides a safe harbor for public charter schools that demonstrate good faith efforts to meet the targets. See N.Y. Educ. Law 2854(2)(a); 2855(1)(e). New York law specifically states that a charter school may . . . establish enrollment preferences for . . . English language learners. 8 NYCRR 119.5(a)(2). SUNY has indicated that an ELL lottery preference will be considered favorably in determining whether a public charter school will be deemed to have met the good faith efforts standard. C. Success Academys ELL Set-Aside At the heart of Success Academys core mission is a deep commitment to serving New York Citys most vulnerable student populations, including English Language Learners. ELL students excel at Success Academy schools. In 2012, 96% of Success Academys current or former ELLs passed the New York State Math exam, and 85% passed the New York State English Language Arts exam.6 By contrast, across New York City, the average current ELL passage rate was 37% on the Math exam and 12% on the English Language Arts exam.7 Like most public charter schools in New York City, however, Success Academy faces significant challenges in meeting the statutorily mandated ELL targets, for the reasons SUNY has identified, as described above. Success Academy has thus implemented a 20% ELL set-aside in its admissions lotteries. The 20% figure was selected after careful consideration of the ELL percentages district-wide and in the community school districts in which Success Academy schools are
See N.Y. Educ. Law 2854(2)(b); Ex. 1 at 6 (excerpt of SUNY presentation, Enrollment and Retention Targets: Review of Progress to Date, October 2, 2010); Ex. 2 at 2 (SUNY memorandum, Establishing Enrollment and Retention Targets for Charter Schools, March 12, 2012). 6 See http://schools.nyc.gov/Accountability/data/TestResults/ ELAandMathTestResults. 7 Id.
located.8
The
goal
was
to
maintain
Success
Academys
commitment
to
serving
New
York
Citys
ELL
student
population
and
also
to
comply
with
the
new
mandated
targets.
Success
Academys
lotteries
operate
as
follows:
(1)
returning
students
and
their
siblings
receive
priority;
(2)
20%
of
the
total
open
seats
are
filled
through
a
random
selection
of
applicants
who
self-identify
as
ELL
on
their
applications
(in- district
applicants
prioritized
over
out-of-district
applicants);
and
(3)
students
who
live
within
the
community
school
district
where
the
school
is
located
then
receive
priority
for
the
remainder
of
the
seats
and
the
waitlist,
ahead
of
out-of-district
applicants.
D.
Lack
of
Notice
from
the
U.S.
DOE
Success
Academy
has
twice
applied
for
and
received
federal
CSP
funding.
Both
times,
Success
Academy
explicitly
stated
that
it
applies
an
admissions
preference
for
ELLs.
See
Ex.
3
at
19;
Ex.
4
at
13
(excerpts
of
applications).
In
October
2010,
the
U.S.
DOE
awarded
Success
Academy
CSP
funding
in
the
amount
of
$9,154,750
to
open
15
and
expand
3
schools
over
5
years,
and
raised
no
questions
concerning
Success
Academys
ELL
preference.
In
October
2011,
the
U.S.
DOE
again
awarded
Success
Academy
CSP
funding
in
the
amount
of
$6,000,001
to
open
6
additional
schools
over
5
years,
and
again
raised
no
questions
concerning
the
ELL
preference.
The
U.S.
DOE
has
disbursed
CSP
funds
to
Success
Academy
over
the
past
3
years.
In
view
of
the
CSP
awards
and
disbursements
(without
any
objection
by
the
U.S.
DOE),
Success
Academy
relied
on
continued
CSP
funding
in
making
critical
growth
and
budgetary
decisions.
Now,
years
later,
the
U.S.
DOE
has
abruptly
changed
course.
On
December
21,
2012,
the
draft
CSP
monitoring
report
was
issued
to
Success
Academy
for
review
and,
for
the
first
time,
raised
a
concern
about
the
ELL
set-aside.
By
this
time,
Success
Academys
student
recruitment
campaign
was
well
underway,
with
the
ELL
set-aside
widely
publicized
and
applications
coming
in.
Success
Academy
sent
timely
comments
on
the
draft
monitoring
report
on
January
18,
2013,
addressing,
among
other
things,
concerns
about
Success
Academys
ELL
set-aside.
8
Success Academy considered the range of ELL percentages in the school district and in community school districts in which Success Academy schools were located. It also considered SUNYs requirement that an ELL preference must prioritize all students falling into the ELL category across all of New York City before prioritizing applicants residing within the community school district that do not fall into the ELL category. In settling on the 20% figure, Success Academy thus balanced the need to meet the statutorily mandated ELL targets with its desire to ensure that its schools were truly neighborhood schools serving the surrounding communityan aim important to both Success Academy and local communities.
Near
the
end
of
March
2013,
Success
Academy
received
the
final
CSP
monitoring
report
(dated
February
2013),
which
raised
the
same
concern
as
the
draft
report
regarding
the
ELL
set-aside.
On
March
25,
2013,
the
CSP
Office
e- mailed
Success
Academy
with
additional
questions
about
the
ELL
set-aside,
to
which
Success
Academy
provided
responses
on
March
27,
2013.
On
April
5,
2013the
day
of
Success
Academys
lotteriesthe
CSP
Office
wrote
to
Success
Academy,
asking
that
Success
Academy
hold
off
on
any
grant
activities
for
schools
implementing
a
weighted
lottery.
The
U.S.
DOE
claims
that
Success
Academys
ELL
set-aside
runs
afoul
of
federal
law
and
U.S.
DOE
guidance.
The
U.S.
DOE
points
to
Title
VI
of
the
Civil
Rights
Act
of
1964
(the
Civil
Rights
Act),
which
prohibits
programs
receiving
federal
funding
to
discriminate
on
the
ground
of
race,
color,
or
national
origin.
See
20
U.S.C.
7221i(1)(G).
It
further
points
to
its
April
2011
Nonregulatory
Guidance
(Guidance),
in
which
the
U.S.
DOE
stated
that
it
permits
weighted
lotteries
only
when
they
are
necessary
to
comply
with
title
VI
of
the
Civil
Rights
Act
of
1964
.
.
.
or
applicable
State
law.
Guidance
at
17.
The
U.S.
DOE
claims
that,
because
New
York
law
does
not
require
an
ELL
preference,
Success
Academy
cannot
implement
such
a
preference
under
the
foregoing
provisions.
As
explained
below,
Success
Academy
disagrees
with
the
U.S.
DOEs
interpretation
of
both
federal
law
and
guidance
and
New
York
state
law.
II.
SUCCESS
ACADEMYS
20%
ELL
SET-ASIDE
IS
ALLOWABLE
UNDER
FEDERAL
LAW
AND
U.S.
DOE
GUIDANCE
A.
Success
Academys
20%
ELL
Set-Aside
Comports
with
the
U.S.
DOEs
CSP
Guidance
Because
the
Set-Aside
is
Necessary
to
Comply
With
State
Law
Success
Academys
20%
ELL
set-aside
is
consistent
with
guidance
that
the
U.S.
DOE
has
issued
regarding
weighted
lotteries.
In
its
April
2011
Nonregulatory
Guidance,
the
U.S.
DOE
stated
that
it
permits
weighted
lotteries9
only
when
they
are
necessary
to
comply
with
title
VI
of
the
Civil
Rights
Act
of
1964
.
.
.
or
applicable
State
law.
Guidance
at
17
(emphasis
supplied).
Success
Academys
20%
ELL
set-aside
is
necessary
to
ensure
that
Success
Academy
complies
with
New
York
state
law.
New
York
law
places
public
charter
schools
at
risk
of
charter
revocation
and/or
non-renewal
for
failure
to
comply
with
statutorily
mandated
enrollment
and
retention
targets
for
ELLs.
N.Y.
Educ.
Law
9
It is not at all clear that Success Academy implements a weighted lottery. Success Academy sets aside 20% of its seats for ELL candidates. This is not the same as a weighted lottery, which suggests a preference for a particular subset of the student population across all of the available seats.
2852(9-a)(b)(i); 2855(1)(e); 2851(4)(e). The target ELL figures must be comparable to the enrollment figures of the surrounding community school district. N.Y. Educ. Law 2852(9-a)(b)(i); 2851(4)(e). Community Analysis Many of Success Academys schools are located within community school districts that have pockets of high concentrations of ELLs (thereby increasing the target percentages), but the schools themselves are not located in or near these areas. This challenging geography makes it virtually impossible for these schools to reach the ELL targets, particularly without an ELL lottery preference. The below map of New York City Community School District 15 (CSD 15) and the immediate surrounding area reflects this reality. Success Academy Cobble Hill is located in the northern part of CSD 15, where the ELL population is thin. However, the southern portion of CSD 15 has a large, concentrated pocket of ELLs.
The concentrated ELL population in the southern portion of CSD 15 significantly skews the average ELL percentage in the CSD upwardand, correspondingly, the mandatory ELL target for Success Academy Cobble Hill upward. As a result, the ELL target for Success Academy Cobble Hill is 18.8 percentage points higher than the schools ELL percentage. 6
Outreach
and
Recruitment
Success
Academy
schools
have
exhausted
every
available
method
of
outreach
and
recruitment
to
attract
more
ELL
applicants,
including
the
following
this
past
year:
o Distributed
over
150,000
bilingual
flyers
at
apartment
doors
in
public
housing
complexes
and
posted
bilingual
flyers
in
the
lobbies;
o Distributed
over
27,000
bilingual
flyers
in
neighborhoods
with
high
ELL
populations;
o Hung
over
58,000
bilingual
door
hangers
in
neighborhoods
with
high
ELL
populations;
o Visited
or
reached
out
to
over
1,399
day
cares,
preschools,
pediatrician
offices,
children-friendly
businesses
with
bilingual
materials;
o Sent
a
Spanish-language
e-mail
to
18,000
subscribers
of
El
Diario,
the
largest
Spanish-language
daily
newspaper
in
New
York
City;10
o Purchased
multiple
Spanish
print
and
online
display
ads
in
El
Diario,
as
well
as
additional
Spanish
online
display
ads
through
a
Spanish
ad
network;
o Placed
numerous
Spanish
out-of-home
ads
(including
buses,
transit
shelters,
and
phone
kiosks);
o Created
a
Spanish-language
version
of
the
Success
Academy
website
and
application;
o Provided
bilingual
staffing
at
numerous
information
sessions
and
tours;
and
o Provided
bilingual
services
through
our
call
center
and
in
response
to
questions
e-mailed
from
prospective
ELL
applicants.
These
efforts,
while
extensive,
do
not
bring
the
average
ELL
percentage
at
Success
Academy
schools
in
line
with
the
average
target
percentages
they
are
required
to
meet.
Lottery
Analysis
Continuing
with
the
example
of
Success
Academy
Cobble
Hill,
the
schools
ELL
target
is
approximately
22.9%.
In
this
years
lottery
(with
the
ELL
set-aside),
25.2%
of
Success
Academy
Cobble
Hills
accepted
applicants
self-identified
as
ELLs.
Without
the
ELL
set-aside,
just
18.9%
of
the
accepted
applicants
would
have
been
self-identified
ELLs4
percentage
points
below
the
required
target.
Moreover,
the
actual
ELL
acceptance
percentage
would
be
significantly
lower
than
18.9%
because
a
percentage
of
the
applicants
mis-identify
themselves
as
ELL,
a
percentage
will
decline
their
seats,
and/or
some
presumably
learn
English
before
they
start
school
in
the
fall.
10
Success Academy conducts significant Spanish-language-speaker outreach based on an analysis of the principal languages spoken by the ELL population in New York City.
With
the
set-aside,
Success
Academy
hopes
to
achieve
the
ELL
targets.
Alternatively,
the
set-aside
will
qualify
Success
Academy
for
the
good
faith
efforts
statutory
safe
harbor,
as
SUNY
has
indicated
that
an
ELL
lottery
preference
will
be
important
in
demonstrating
good
faith
efforts.
Accordingly,
the
set-aside
is
necessary
to
comply
with
.
.
.
applicable
State
law.
Guidance
at
17.
B.
Success
Academys
20%
ELL
Set-Aside
Comports
with
Federal
Law
Success
Academys
20%
ELL
set-aside
comports
with
the
Civil
Rights
Acts
prohibition
against
discrimination
on
the
ground
of
race,
color,
or
national
origin.
See
20
U.S.C.
7221i(1)(G).
The
ELL
designation
is
not
synonymous
with
race,
color,
or
national
origin.
Indeed,
several
federal
courts
have
recognized
that
language
and
national
origin
are
not
necessarily
interchangeable.
See,
e.g.,
Mumid
v.
Abraham
Lincoln
High
School,
618
F.3d
789,
795
(8th
Cir.
2010)
(finding
a
schools
ELL
policy
did
not
single
out
a
protected
class
because
language
and
national
origin
are
not
interchangeable);
Soberal-Perez
v.
Heckler,
717
F.2d
36,
41
(2d
Cir.
1983)
(finding
that
a
classification
on
the
basis
of
language,
i.e.,
English-speaking
versus
non- English-speaking
individuals,
is
not
on
its
face
a
classification
with
respect
to
national
origin);
Olagues
v.
Russoniello,
797
F.2d
1511,
1521
(9th
Cir.
1986)
(distinguishing
the
language-only
classification
in
Soberal-Perez
from
a
classification
based
on
foreign-born
status
and
affirming
that
a
non-English-speaking
classification
is
facially
neutral
with
respect
to
ethnic
group
classification);
Garcia
v.
Gloor,
618
F.2d
264,
268
(5th
Cir.
1980)
(finding
that
prohibiting
bilingual
employees
from
speaking
a
foreign
language
does
not
discriminate
on
the
basis
of
national
origin).
In
New
York
City
in
particular,
a
students
ability
to
speak
English
does
not
necessarily
correlate
to
national
origin.
Families
often
pass
a
language
to
their
children
from
generation
to
generation
born
in
the
United
States.
Success
Academys
ELL
preference
is
based
on
the
ability
to
speak
English
and
not
national
origin.
While
ELL
status
is
not,
therefore,
a
good
proxy
for
national
origin,
unfortunately,
ELL
status
often
correlates
with
low
student
expectations
and
performance.
In
New
York
City,
ELLs
pass
the
New
York
statewide
tests
at
a
rate
consistently
30-40
percentage
points
below
their
non-ELL
peers
on
the
English
Language
Arts
exam,
and
20-25
percentage
points
below
their
non-ELL
peers
on
the
Math
exam.11
It
is
the
correlation
of
ELLs
to
low
student
performance
that
is
11
See
http://schools.nyc.gov/Accountability/data/TestResults/
ELAandMathTestResults.
See
also
Ex.
5
(The
Parking
Lot
of
Broken
Dreams:
How
English
Language
Learner
Programs
in
NYC
hurt
children,
March
2011).
particularly pernicious. Success Academy strives to change this unacceptable correlation through its 20% ELL set-aside and the world-class education it provides to all of it students, including its ELL population. The U.S. DOE should not discourage public charter schools from serving higher percentages of ELLs. III. CONCLUSION Success Academys 20% ELL set-aside comports with federal law and guidance, and is necessary for Success Academy to comply with state law. Success Academy urges the U.S. DOE to reconsider its determination in light of the information provided above.