The Impact of 3D Printing On Global Supply Chains
The Impact of 3D Printing On Global Supply Chains
LOGISTICS INDUSTRY
JOHN MANNERS-BELL, CEO, TRANSPORT INTELLIGENCE LTD
KEN LYON, CEO, VIRTUAL-PARTNERS LTD
3D Printing, or additive manufacturing as it is also known, has the potential to become the biggest
single disruptive phenomenon to impact global industry since assembly lines were introduced in early
twentieth century America.
New technologies which are currently being developed could revolutionise production techniques,
resulting in a significant proportion of manufacturing becoming automated and removing reliance on large
and costly work forces. This in turn could lead to a reversal of the trend of globalisation which has
characterised industry and consumption over the last few decades, itself predicated on the trade-off
between transportation and labour costs.
Globalisation has benefited shipping lines, airlines and freight forwarders enormously as vast quantities of
consumer goods are moved internationally to Western markets from the Far East. Consequently any
challenge to globalisation must be viewed as a threat to the global transportation industry. However, as
with all disruptive technologies, it also offers opportunities. This briefing takes a look at the new
technology, assesses the chances of its widespread adoption and examines its implications for the
logistics industry.
WHAT IS 3D PRINTING?
3D Printing was originally developed as an automated method of producing prototypes. Although there
are several competing technologies, most work on the basis of building up layers of material (sometimes
plastic, ceramics or even metal powders) using a computer aided design. Hence, it is referred to as an
additive process; each layer is printed until a three dimensional product is created.
The logic for using 3D Printing for prototypes is compelling. Traditional reductive manufacturing
techniques (where materials are removed) can take longer and are much more expensive. Mechanical
parts, shoes, fashion items and accessories and other consumer goods, can all be printed for review by
the designer or engineers, and revisions printed equally as easily. Whereas mass production is viable due
to economies of scale, it is uneconomical for 'one offs' and prototypes. 3D Printing will remove this
differential, where every item produced is an original (or perfect copy) and tooling for one is as cheap as
tooling for many.
The final 3D Printed product also has other benefits. Products can be lighter, but just as strong. There is
also less wastage. In comparison traditional reductive manufacturing is highly inefficient in the use of
materials.
The way in which each product is individually manufactured means that it is ideal for mass customisation
techniques. Consumers will, in theory, be able to have a much greater say in the final format of the
product which they are buying, and have it manufactured to their precise specifications.
Looking even further into the future, some household products could actually be manufactured in the
consumers home, once the cost of 3D printing technology has become affordable. This would have even
greater implications for the logistics industry this time on a domestic rather than international basis. This
is not as far off as may be thought. 3D Printers for consumers can already be purchased for just a few
hundred dollars.
Potentially a proportion of goods which were previously produced in China or other Asia markets
could be near-sourced to North America and Europe. This would reduce shipping and air cargo
volumes.
The mass customisation of products would mean that inventory levels fall, as goods are made to
order. This would have the effect of reducing warehousing requirements.
There would be fewer opportunities for logistics suppliers to be involved in companies upstream
supply chains, as manufacturing processes are increasingly re-bundled within a single facility.
Tiers of component suppliers are done away with, as is the need for supplier villages, line side
supply etc.
A major new sector of the logistics industry would emerge dealing with the storage and
movement of the raw materials which feed the 3D Printers. As 3D Printers become more
affordable to the general public, the home delivery market of these materials would increase.
The Service Parts Logistics sector would be one of the first to be affected. At present billions are
spent on holding stock to supply products as diverse as cars to x-ray machines. In some cases
huge amount of redundancy is built into supply chains to enable parts to be dispatched in a very
short timescale to get machines up and running again as fast as possible. It doesnt take much
imagination to understand the benefits for a service parts engineer of being able to download a
part design from an online library, 3D Print it and then fit it within a very short time window. This
would make global and national parts warehouses as well as forward stock locations
unnecessary to fulfilling customer needs.
CONCLUSION
If the new technology is to completely transform global industry, 3D Printing must be able to mass
produce goods in the same volumes as traditional manufacturing techniques. At present the jury is still
out on whether this is feasible. Some in the sector (such as GE) foresee a time when a whole engine, for
example, could be printed. Others believe that at least in the medium term, hybrid solutions will develop,
which combine new technologies with more traditional techniques.
However what 3D Printing is certainly not is science fiction. Its ability to create strong but light parts has
been identified by the aerospace sector; components for the automotive sector are already being printed
and the technology is being adopted by the mobile telecoms sector.
It has been estimated that in 2012 up to 30% of finished products already involve some kind of 3D
printing. By 2016, this is expected to rise to 50% and by 2020 potentially up to 80%.
Production Prototypes
SOON
LATER
It is difficult to see that industry will undergo complete transformation for many years probably decades
to come. What could happen, though, is that that some sectors are penetrated by the technology at a
much earlier stage, such as the manufacture of spare parts. In this case, the most enlightened logistics
companies could even become early adopters of the technologies investing in the 3D Printers and
providing facilities for engineers rather than kicking against the progress. This would also provide a way
of leveraging their capital and their own technological capabilities.
It is clear that if the larger logistics companies delay or ignore the implications of this trend, they are
vulnerable to new kinds of organisations or associations that will match or leap ahead of their capabilities
for very little outlay.
THE AUTHORS
John Manners-Bell MSc FCILT, CEO of Transport Intelligence, has over two decades experience working
in and analysing the global logistics industry. He is a member of the World Economic Forums Logistics
and Supply Chain Global Agenda Council and has advised a wide range of governmental organisations
and industry bodies.
Ken Lyon is a long term innovator in the development of collaborative supply chain networks and
communities. He is a recognised industry expert, experienced public speaker, government advisor and
technology consultant.
For more information contact John Manners-Bell on [email protected]
About Transport Intelligence
With a research organisation spanning the worlds key markets, Ti is the leading provider of expert
analysis dedicated to the global logistics industry. Ti has developed a range of market leading web-based
products, reports, profiles and services used by all of the worlds leading logistics suppliers,
manufacturers, consultancies and banks.
www.transportintelligence.com