Case 1 Quest Foods Asia Pacific and The CRM Initiative: Questions
Case 1 Quest Foods Asia Pacific and The CRM Initiative: Questions
Questions: -
1. How would you rate MacFadden as a manager, based on the progress he has made
on CRM?
3. The case lists several go-forward options for MacFadden: (1) Quest could
implement an internal knowledge management system first, proceed with BPR,
and then extend that model externally to its customers; (2) Quest could move
forward with CRM but develop a generic system; or (3) Quest could jump into
CRM with a core customer who could act as a learning partner. Which of these
three approaches would you recommend? Why?
Questions: -
Preparation Questions
Questions: -
Preparation Questions
Questions: -
Questions: -
1. How did Carnival’s management build the line into the dominant brand in the
industry?
2. Should Carnival do “CRM”? What should CRM look like at Carnival? What does
CRM mean to Carnival’s management?
4. What else should they do to leverage customer data for enhancing the guest experience
and the company’s bottom line?
Case 6
Customer Relationship
Management at Capital One (UK)
Questions: -
2. If it is to become more than a concept, CRM needs to be translated into specific activities and
processes. Based on the case, what are the key CRM activities and processes of Capital One? Do they
differ according to life cycle stages of a customer?
3. What can be learned from the CRM practice at Capital One that could be applied to [fill in company
name or industry]? What aspects cannot be applied?
4. It is often claimed that CRM can create competitive advantage. Does CRM create competitive
advantage for Capital One? If so, how?
Case 7
ROI for a Customer Relationship Management
Initiative at GST
Questions: -
2. What sort of monthly cash flows should GST expect to realize from the new
program?
4. How does the team’s decision to utilize a three-year horizon affect the ROI?
Payback?
5. How should the team incorporate its discussion of data reliability into the
Business Impact Assessment?
6. Why might using a higher hurdle rate for risky investments be a good idea? Why
might it be a bad idea?