SBA Assessment
SBA Assessment
25 (S): 71 - 80 (2017)
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study is to analyse the success of School Based Assessment (SBA)
implemented in 2010/11 in Malaysia. It examines teachers’ readiness, confidence level and
enjoyment in teaching mathematics. It also investigates if participation in SBA professional
development courses impacted on teachers’ readiness for it. A total, of 260 teachers (65
males and 195 females) were selected as respondents while 12 teachers were interviewed
for their feedback. The findings show= that the teachers involved in the study have a low
level of readiness and confidence in implementing SBA. Professional development courses
related to SBA did not have any impact on teachers’ readiness level. More than two-thirds
of them reported that they did not enjoy teaching since the implementation of SBA. This
study indicates more effort is needed to enhance teachers’ competency in achieving the
goals of SBA.
Keywords: Confidence, implementation, professional development courses, readiness, School Based Assessment
2012). The transformation of the current arithmetic skills in early 2000s, but this
system was initiated to move away from practice too ended. In 2004, PPSMI was
centralised examinations and to focus on introduced whereby Mathematics and
continuous assessment, improve student Science were taught in English to improve
learning, conduct more holistic assessments, their English language skills. Despite an
and improve examinations at the school investment of more than RM1 billion on
and central levels. Chappuis and Chappuis teaching and learning tools and professional
(2008) claim that SBA is able to provide development, it was shelved in 2011/12.
relevant information to students during the Subsequently, SBA was introduced in Year
learning stage, enhance their performance 1 in 2011 and Secondary 1 in 2012 mainly
and status of their achievements to meet due to students’ poor performance in TIMSS
their learning objectives. In addition, and PISA studies (2003 to 2011).
formative assessment techniques provided In light of the changes over the last two
information on the quality of teaching (Hall decades, this research attempts to answer
& Burke, 2003). the following research questions: a) are
The SBA confers greater responsibility teachers affected by the implementation
on the teachers to design quality of SBA have understood the philosophy of
assessments that match students’ learning SBA?; b) are teachers confident and ready
outcomes. However, it was discovered that to conduct SBA?; c) Do the teachers have
teachers’ workload had increased since the competency in varying their repertoire
the implementation of SBA, resulting in of teaching strategies to purposes?; and
dissatisfaction with the policy (Azrul, d) are teachers expected to be creative
2011; Lee, 2012). Teachers are required to in using various teaching strategies and
record their assessments online but they repertoire of methods in assessing their
experience frequent server malfunctions. students? Tong and Adamson (2015) opined
Azlin, Ong, Mohamad, Rose, and Nurhayati, that assessments are an important tool in
(2013) confirmed that “under this system, facilitating student progress in learning.
teachers are given greater responsibility Hence, teachers must have high levels
to design quality assessments that align of confidence while assessing student
with the learning outcomes” (p.102). Their performance in SBA. There is also a need to
additional responsibilities include updating know if attending professional development
the filing systems which contain students’ SBA courses has significant relationship
evidence of learning and their examination with teachers’ readiness in conducting SBA.
marks. On the contrary, there have been In a study conducted by Alaba (2012),
various measures put in place to enhance it was revealed that more than half of the
mathematics teaching. For example, abacus teachers in Nigeria were not prepared for
(also known as Sempoa) was introduced the implementation of SBA and which led
to boost pupils’ computation and mental to the scrapping of the policy. Another
Table 1
Teacher’s readiness in implementing SBA (n=260)
Mean SD
I have a good understanding of the requirement of SBA 6.20 1.74
I have a good understanding of the procedure of SBA 6.19 1.72
I have a good understanding of the marking criteria of SBA 6.15 1.76
I have a good understanding of the moderation system of SBA 6.04 1.77
I have a good understanding of the underlying assessment philosophy of SBA 5.89 1.69
Overall 6.10 1.65
Scale 1= Least, 10 = Most
Table 2
Teachers’ confidence levels since the implementation of SBA
Table 2 shows the highest mean score meeting the students’ needs based on their
obtained for the item ‘give clear explanations feedback” (M=6.27, SD=1.57). On the
regarding students’ achievement according other hand, the lowest level of confidence
to mastery level’ (M=6.28, SD=1.64) is obtained for the item ‘I can access each
followed by “I can confidently plan the student individually according to his or her
next teaching and learning activity in needs’ (M=6.14, SD=1.74). The other items
Table 4
T-test comparing mean score between teachers’ readiness and the number of courses attended
teachers attending 3 or more courses related SBA courses have a higher level of
(mean=6.40, SD=1.63) is higher than readiness than their counterparts attending
those attending 1 to 2 courses (mean=6.04, 1 to 2 courses, these differences are not
SD=1.64). However, the t-test analysis significant. In other words, attending more
indicates no significant difference [t (238) professional development courses did
= -1.622, p=.106] between both these scores not seem to have any effect in enhancing
at the 0.05 level. Thus, we fail to reject teachers’ level of readiness in implementing
the null hypothesis. This clearly indicates SBA.
that although teachers attending 3 or more Research Question 4: