Follow Up Microsoft
Follow Up Microsoft
r.'”:
iO A % 08
in-jr
iU-J
Microsoft Corporation,
Plaintiff,
Case No. l-24-cv-2323-AJT
V.
Defendants.
INTRODUCTION
AI services using tools specifically designed to circumvent Microsoft’s access controls and
safety measures. On December 20, 2024, the Court issued a sealed ex parte Temporary
Restraining Order and subsequently entered an amended order extending the TRO on December
30, 2024 (collectively, the “TRO”). The Court’s orders have been effective. In response to
receiving notice of this action and the Court’s TRO, Defendants and certain third parties disabled
have also tried to cover their tracks by deleting evidence of their activities.
Defendants have not responded to multiple emails from the undersigned and, as of the
time of this filing, have not responded to the Court’s OSC. Accordingly, for all the reasons stated
in Microsoft’s initial moving papers and the cases and supporting materials cited in this
supplemental brief, Microsoft respectfully requests that the Court convert the TRO into a
ARGUMENT
The purpose of a preliminary injunction is to preserve the status quo pending final
resolution of the case. E.g., Hoechst Diafoil Co. v. Nan Ya Plastics Corp., 174 F.3d 411, 422 (4th
Cir. 1999). To obtain a preliminary injunction, a movant must demonstrate: (1) likely success on
the merits; (2) likely irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief; (3) that the balance of
equities favors an injunction; and (4) that an injunction is in the public interest. Winter v. Nat. Res.
Def Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008). The Court considered these same factors in issuing the
TRO and there is “no reason to disturb” those findings, particularly in view of Defendants’ failure
to respond to the Court’s Order to Show Cause. Clearone Advantage, LLC v. Kersen, 713 F. Supp.
3d 86, 87-88 (D. Md. 2024) (citing Glaxosmithkline, LLC v. Brooks, 2022 WL 2916170, at *2 (D.
Md. July 25, 2022) for the proposition that it “may be appropriate to convert a TRO into a
preliminary injunction as a result of a defendant’s failure to defend and/or failure to appear” and
11A Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2949 (3d ed. 2023)
(explaining that an evidentiary hearing on a preliminary injunction request is not required when
The same facts...that supported entering a TRO...support converting the TRO into a
preliminary injunction.” Glaxosmithkline, LLC v. Brooks, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132470, at *12
(D. Md. 2022). Although certain of the subject infrastructure has been disabled, Defendants’
malicious code is presumably still in their possession, creating a continuing risk of the misconduct
at issue. In fact, some of Defendants’ users have discussed continued efforts to abuse generative
Deck”) ^ 4. Moreover, it appears that Defendants are attempting to conceal evidence of their
activities. Lyons Deck 3. Such bad faith conduct supports an injunction. E.g., Mey v. Pintas,
-2-
Case 1:24-cv-02323-MSN-WEF Document 34 Filed 01/10/25 Page 3 of 4 PageID# 492
Civil Action No. 5:24-CV-55, 2024 U.S. Dist LEXIS 99273, at *13 (N.D.W. Va. May 17, 2024)
(bad faith conduct supported injunction); Walsh v. Med. Stafifng of Am., LLC, 2023 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 203645, at *14 (E.D. Va. Sep. 7, 2023) (“Defendants’ pattern of ELSA violations and bad
faith efforts to avoid compliance weigh heavily in favor of granting a prospective injunction”).
CONCLUSION
For all the foregoing reasons. Plaintiff requests conversion of the TRO into a preliminary
-3 -
Case 1:24-cv-02323-MSN-WEF Document 34 Filed 01/10/25 Page 4 of 4 PageID# 493
Of Counsel:
RICHARD BOSCOVICH
[email protected]
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Microsoft Redwest Building C
5600 148th AveNE
Redmond, Washington 98052
Telephone: +1 425 704 0867
Facsimile: +1 425 706 7329
-4-
Case 1:24-cv-02323-MSN-WEF Document 34-1 Filed 01/10/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 494
Microsoft Corporation,
Plaintiff, ' n
A c- no
; u
Case No:1-24-cv-2323-A5T' “
V.
Defendants.
Cybercrime Enforcement Team at Microsoft Corporation. I make this declaration based upon my
personal knowledge, and upon infonnation and belief from my review of documents and
evidence collected during Microsoft’s investigation, including the information referenced in the
2. I understand that Microsoft provided notice to Defendants of this action and the
Court’s TRO on Januai-y 3, 2025, after confinning that the “aitism.net” ___domain had been
redirected as required by the Court’s temporary restraining order and seiwing third-party
subpoenas.
3. 1 am infonned and believe that after receiving notice of this action and the Court’s
TRO, Defendants began taking steps to cover then- tracks, including by attempting to delete
certain Rentry.org pages, the GitHub repository for the de3u tool, and portions of the reverse
proxy infrastructure.
Case 1:24-cv-02323-MSN-WEF Document 34-1 Filed 01/10/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 495
4. I am informed and believe that users of Defendants’ service became aware of this
action after Microsoft served email notice on Defendants. Among other things, users posted
messages such as the following on a website used to communicate about Defendants malicious’
service:
● “Fizz isn’t hosting anymore, I’m sorry proxylings, we have three Claude sources, we’ll
be fine”
● “I now have to turk this thread carefully again in case fiz comes back”
Tme and correct copies of a sample of users’ messages are attached hereto as Exhibit A.
I declare under penalty of peijury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
true and correct to the best of my knowledge, infonnation, and belief. Executed this 9th day of
Jason Lyons
-2-
Case 1:24-cv-02323-MSN-WEF Document 34-2 Filed 01/10/25 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 496
Exhibit A
Case 1:24-cv-02323-MSN-WEF Document 34-2 Filed 01/10/25 Page 2 of 8 PageID# 497
https://rentiy.org/minIproxy
>>103795626
FoOowing Librarian on Twitter has led to a lot of Balatro fanart showmg up in my feed, so look forward to that I guess.
https://rentry.org/6z
Fiz isn't hosting anymore, I'm sorry proxynigs. We have 3 claude sources, we'll be 6ne.
>>103795651
maybe OpenAI and co.? Would also explain her sudden departure.
Case 1:24-cv-02323-MSN-WEF Document 34-2 Filed 01/10/25 Page 3 of 8 PageID# 498
>>103795636
foravnrily Usd up Rzhs FBI dateiKian ceB
>>.1fla79MSS
To quote a sem!-vlrd post that LBtrarian idrced onto my feed by replying to It.
>7011 lowkey stee^g on baleirs pom
On a related topic, I finally found a 7y7 poker-related fanert to match my/ui ones. This la a threat
nonnells alright but fjst doesn't quite hit the same as opus, I wish I didn't have to pay out the ass for fi
□ Anonymous 01/07/25(Tue)11:39:04No.103795921 ►
Fiz’s locusts are dying~
>https://irentry.org/request-url
>This URL was deleted by an admin due to a legal request and Is not available.
>same for /fiz
The end is nigh.
>>103795915
Yes please
>>103795922
How could Ian do this...
>>103795922
smol had his rentry nuked so he just hosted it himself why can't fiz do the same
* This URL was deleted by an admin due to a legal request and is not available.
URL
rentry.co/ miniproxy
>https:/yrentry.or§/requ6St-url
>Thl9 URL was deleted by an admin due to a legal request and is not available.
>same for /fiz
The end is nigh.
Case 1:24-cv-02323-MSN-WEF Document 34-2 Filed 01/10/25 Page 5 of 8 PageID# 500
□ Anonymous 0t/07/25(Tue)11:43:42No.103795960 ►
>>103795955
damn the jail has internet now?
Case 1:24-cv-02323-MSN-WEF Document 34-2 Filed 01/10/25 Page 6 of 8 PageID# 501
□ Anonymous 01/07/25(Tue)12:00:54No.103796120 ►
I ated fiz :)
□ Anonymous 01/07/25(Tue)12:02:18No.103796134 ►
fiz is under an^esl
63 » £ V
Case 1:24-cv-02323-MSN-WEF Document 34-2 Filed 01/10/25 Page 7 of 8 PageID# 502
□ Anonymous 01/07/25CTue)12:39:44No.103796433 ►
>>103796395
hi :3
□ Anonymous 01/07/25(Tue)14:11:19No.103797220 ►
Do we know which prison they're keeping Flz in?
□ Anonymous 01/07/25(Tue)16;47;42No.103798937 ►
?>Jg2I9e^Z
Sh«*ft by OpmW.
>>103798854
HI ^ 11 ifsOVEEEEEEEEEER
Rip FIz ■ \W ^,9 MI^OOOOOSSSSSSSS
BWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHHW
>>103798944
And Unreliable