Debian Bug report logs - #642835
sexplib310: FTBFS: E: Command /usr/bin/ocamlbuild terminated with error code 10

Reply or subscribe to this bug.

Display info messages

Message #5 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Mònica Ramírez Arceda <[email protected]>

To: [email protected]

Subject: sexplib310: FTBFS: E: Command /usr/bin/ocamlbuild terminated with error code 10

Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 13:11:37 +0200

Source: sexplib310
Version: 5.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: [email protected]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/sexplib310-thKNHg/sexplib310-5.2.1'
> ocaml setup.ml -build
> I: Running command '/usr/bin/ocamlbuild lib/sexplib.cma lib/sexplib.cmxa lib/sexplib.a syntax/pa_sexp_conv.cma lib_test/conv_test.byte -tag debug'
> /usr/bin/ocamlopt -I /usr/lib/ocaml/ocamlbuild unix.cmxa /usr/lib/ocaml/ocamlbuild/ocamlbuildlib.cmxa myocamlbuild.ml /usr/lib/ocaml/ocamlbuild/ocamlbuild.cmx -o myocamlbuild
> ocamlfind ocamldep -package unix -package num -package bigarray -modules lib/type.ml > lib/type.ml.depends
> /usr/bin/ocamlyacc lib/parser.mly
> ocamlfind ocamldep -package unix -package num -package bigarray -modules lib/parser.mli > lib/parser.mli.depends
> ocamlfind ocamlc -c -g -package unix -package num -package bigarray -I lib -I syntax -o lib/type.cmo lib/type.ml
> ocamlfind ocamlc -c -g -package unix -package num -package bigarray -I lib -I syntax -o lib/parser.cmi lib/parser.mli
> ocamlfind ocamldep -package unix -package num -package bigarray -modules lib/parser.ml > lib/parser.ml.depends
> /usr/bin/ocamllex -q lib/lexer.mll
> ocamlfind ocamldep -package unix -package num -package bigarray -modules lib/lexer.ml > lib/lexer.ml.depends
> ocamlfind ocamldep -package unix -package num -package bigarray -pp cpp -modules lib/pre_sexp.ml > lib/pre_sexp.ml.depends
> + ocamlfind ocamldep -package unix -package num -package bigarray -pp cpp -modules lib/pre_sexp.ml > lib/pre_sexp.ml.depends
> Command exited with code 2.
> E: Command '/usr/bin/ocamlbuild lib/sexplib.cma lib/sexplib.cmxa lib/sexplib.a syntax/pa_sexp_conv.cma lib_test/conv_test.byte -tag debug' terminated with error code 10
> make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_build] Error 1

The full build log is available from:
   http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/23/sexplib310_5.2.1-1_lsid64.buildlog

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot.  Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.

Message #10 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Stéphane Glondu <[email protected]>

To: [email protected]

Cc: [email protected], Mònica Ramírez Arceda <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: Bug#642706: bin-prot: FTBFS: Command '/usr/bin/ocamlbuild syntax/pa_bin_prot.cma syntax/pa_bin_prot.cmxa syntax/pa_bin_prot.a lib/libbin_prot.a lib/dllbin_prot.so lib/bin_prot.cma lib/bin_prot.cmxa lib/bin_prot.a lib_test/test_runner.native -tag debug' terminated with error code 10

Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 15:38:06 +0200

Le 25/09/2011 00:00, Eric Cooper a écrit :
> I get the same error.  Here's what I did to reproduce it.
> 
> $ apt-get source libbin-prot-camlp4-dev
> $ cd bin-prot-1.3.1/
> $ DIST=sid ARCH=amd64 git-pbuilder update
> $ pdebuild --pbuilder cowbuilder -- --basepath /var/cache/pbuilder/base-sid-amd64.cow

Well... this is very strange. The same steps (except that my chroot is
in /var/cache/pbuilder/base.cow) do not produce any error on amd64. But
I get the error on i386 and armel.

Same symptoms with bug #642835. Investigating...


Cheers,

-- 
Stéphane

Message #15 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Stéphane Glondu <[email protected]>

To: [email protected]

Cc: [email protected], Mònica Ramírez Arceda <[email protected]>, [email protected]

Subject: Re: Bug#642706: bin-prot: FTBFS: Command '/usr/bin/ocamlbuild syntax/pa_bin_prot.cma syntax/pa_bin_prot.cmxa syntax/pa_bin_prot.a lib/libbin_prot.a lib/dllbin_prot.so lib/bin_prot.cma lib/bin_prot.cmxa lib/bin_prot.a lib_test/test_runner.native -tag debug' terminated with error code 10

Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 17:59:30 +0200

tags 642706 - unreproducible
thanks

Le 25/09/2011 15:38, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
>> I get the same error.  Here's what I did to reproduce it.
>>
>> $ apt-get source libbin-prot-camlp4-dev
>> $ cd bin-prot-1.3.1/
>> $ DIST=sid ARCH=amd64 git-pbuilder update
>> $ pdebuild --pbuilder cowbuilder -- --basepath /var/cache/pbuilder/base-sid-amd64.cow
> 
> Well... this is very strange. The same steps (except that my chroot is
> in /var/cache/pbuilder/base.cow) do not produce any error on amd64. But
> I get the error on i386 and armel.

In my amd64 sid chroot, /bin/sh was symlinked to bash. After linking it
to dash, I can reproduce the error. The error disappears if I downgrade
dash to 0.5.5.1-7.4. I'm not yet sure who's to blame here... I'm putting
dash maintainers in the loop.


Cheers,

-- 
Stéphane

Message #20 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Stéphane Glondu <[email protected]>

To: [email protected]

Cc: Jonathan Nieder <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected]

Subject: Re: Bug#642922: regression: "sh -c" change causes FTBFS

Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 19:41:30 +0200

block 642835 by 642922
block 642706 by 642922
severity 642922 serious
thanks

Le 25/09/2011 19:28, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> Bugs #642706 (bin-prot FTBFS) and #642835 (sexplib310 FTBFS) can be
> fixed by reverting the patch submitted at [1]. I don't understand why.
> 
> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.shells.dash/556
> 
> While investigating #642706, in the failing case, I observed that a
> cpp process called with "sh -c" gets SIGPIPE while writing to
> stderr. In the succeeding case, the write is successful, and is read
> by the ocamlbuild process that started "sh -c cpp ...".

Raising severity, since it blocks serious bugs.


Cheers,

-- 
Stéphane

Message #27 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jonathan Nieder <[email protected]>

To: Stéphane Glondu <[email protected]>

Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Subject: Re: regression: "sh -c" change causes FTBFS

Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 13:39:44 -0500

severity 642922 important
quit

Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 25/09/2011 19:28, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :

>> Bugs #642706 (bin-prot FTBFS) and #642835 (sexplib310 FTBFS) can be
>> fixed by reverting the patch submitted at [1]. I don't understand why.
>>
>> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.shells.dash/556
[...]
> Raising severity, since it blocks serious bugs.

Thanks for letting me know.  This is important (and a regression), but
it should be possible to work around in ocamlbuild as easily as using
"bash", so I don't see why that would make it release-critical.

I'll investigate further to see if the underlying problem is an
assumption in the relevant scripts that would be violated by ksh93,
too, or just a dash bug.

Thanks,
Jonathan

Message #32 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jonathan Nieder <[email protected]>

To: [email protected]

Cc: Stéphane Glondu <[email protected]>, [email protected]

Subject: Re: bin-prot: FTBFS: Command '/usr/bin/ocamlbuild syntax/pa_bin_prot.cma syntax/pa_bin_prot.cmxa syntax/pa_bin_prot.a lib/libbin_prot.a lib/dllbin_prot.so lib/bin_prot.cma lib/bin_prot.cmxa lib/bin_prot.a lib_test/test_runner.native -tag debug' terminated with error code 10

Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 06:04:42 -0500

Hi,

Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:

> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
[...]
>> + ocamlfind ocamldep -pp 'cpp -DARCH_SIXTYFOUR' -package unix -package bigarray -modules lib/unsafe_read_c.mli > lib/unsafe_read_c.mli.depends
>> Command exited with code 2.
>> E: Command '/usr/bin/ocamlbuild syntax/pa_bin_prot.cma syntax/pa_bin_prot.cmxa syntax/pa_bin_prot.a lib/libbin_prot.a lib/dllbin_prot.so lib/bin_prot.cma lib/bin_prot.cmxa lib/bin_prot.a lib_test/test_runner.native -tag debug' terminated with error code 10

Thanks again for all your work in tracking these down!  I assume
bin-prot/sid and sexplib310 build correctly again against dash
0.5.7-2.

So what should be done with these bugs?  I am tempted to say:

 - lower severity to important, since we have a workaround
 - reassign to current ocaml-nox
 - merge and mark as forwarded to
   http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=5371

Does that sound reasonable?

Jonathan
who is looking forward to having a few fewer RC bugs on his radar :)

Message #37 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Stéphane Glondu <[email protected]>

To: Jonathan Nieder <[email protected]>

Cc: [email protected], [email protected]

Subject: Re: bin-prot: FTBFS: Command '/usr/bin/ocamlbuild syntax/pa_bin_prot.cma syntax/pa_bin_prot.cmxa syntax/pa_bin_prot.a lib/libbin_prot.a lib/dllbin_prot.so lib/bin_prot.cma lib/bin_prot.cmxa lib/bin_prot.a lib_test/test_runner.native -tag debug' terminated with error code 10

Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:07:11 +0200

merge 642706 642835
severity 642706 important
reassign 642706 ocaml-nox
found 642706 3.12.0-7
retitle 642706 ocamlbuild: questionable job control
forwarded 642706 http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=5371
affects 642706 src:bin-prot src:sexplib310
thanks

Le 16/10/2011 13:04, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
> So what should be done with these bugs?  I am tempted to say:
> 
>  - lower severity to important, since we have a workaround
>  - reassign to current ocaml-nox
>  - merge and mark as forwarded to
>    http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=5371
> 
> Does that sound reasonable?

Agreed.


-- 
Stéphane

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.