Debian Bug report logs - #719860
powertop: wrong power report status

version graph

Package: powertop; Maintainer for powertop is Kan-Ru Chen (陳侃如) <[email protected]>; Source for powertop is src:powertop (PTS, buildd, popcon).

Reported by: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[email protected]>

Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 08:33:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in versions powertop/2.0-0.3, powertop/2.6.1-1

Full log


🔗 View this message in rfc822 format

X-Loop: [email protected]
Subject: Bug#719860: powertop: wrong power report status
Reply-To: [email protected], [email protected]
Resent-To: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[email protected]>
X-Loop: [email protected]
Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 06:45:08 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Resent-Sender: [email protected]
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 719860
X-Debian-PR-Package: powertop
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Debian-PR-Source: powertop
Received: via spool by [email protected] id=U719860.137844983522617
          (code U ref 719860); Fri, 06 Sep 2013 06:45:08 +0000
Received: (at 719860-submitter) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2013 06:43:55 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
	(2011-06-06) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
	PGPSIGNATURE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=unavailable
	version=3.3.2-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 32; hammy, 151; neutral, 47; spammy,
	0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*c:pgp-sha512, 0.000-+--H*r:TLSv1.2,
	0.000-+--HX-Google-DKIM-Signature:in-reply-to,
	0.000-+--HX-Google-DKIM-Signature:references, 0.000-+--H*c:pgp-signature
Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45])
	by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128)
	(Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
	id 1VHplq-0005s8-T5
	for [email protected]; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 06:43:55 +0000
Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id mc17so2814616pbc.18
        for <[email protected]>; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 23:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization
         :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to
         :content-type;
        bh=+mx9Nhw9Zw/kBgXsS8luQtaFKURS0zaBvbgKJpPi1Wk=;
        b=hbCYK9rawlAh7t4nokHBPNUOIVnhzPfL3vKX4o+mTW+It9EH9HYa8tyo++Fk2RHVWR
         jFk0jq8hoEudjiIA/KXRELjqdBEQzxjR20wHPQ8GwKiZnydNRspsasYV2ma7zOn73Vox
         ZstdFW9X9aPM6F2j3KYtAsEisid2HORqWsYjrEr81loU53BH9iPFx2h/AswwxYa9AVkO
         BuV6TyE8pKZjTV2S0F5ECd1Xr7NMJCrmGXxhq+aEvOVfBEbo4juad0yxZbrhjsTVIYyU
         nqkBVUK84D3rv29TZj9yx44pUqMJSI1wdg0fP3z/E3J41e7o/7znSdvq9+Rg1+O1fU9P
         If9w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn7XNOpvakP5DeuaHgtmOyEQt6d5UlK399CaT/ajI9F3cCWShKySnCIBuJKYOz75ClQ1+II
X-Received: by 10.66.26.132 with SMTP id l4mr2150659pag.138.1378449827977;
        Thu, 05 Sep 2013 23:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([27.7.131.54])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bt1sm1709063pbb.2.1969.12.31.16.00.00
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Thu, 05 Sep 2013 23:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id B373B3000A2;
	Fri,  6 Sep 2013 12:13:42 +0530 (IST)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 12:13:35 +0530
From: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[email protected]>
Organization: RESEARCHUT
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130821 Icedove/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jose Luis Rivas <[email protected]>, [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
References: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="----enig2GVGIWGLCLROFQNLKQUAB"
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Wednesday 04 September 2013 09:55 PM, Jose Luis Rivas wrote:
> More data?
>
> Why is bad the reporting? What's reporting? Comparing with `acpi -V`?
WHat more data do you want? I think I've provided you with enough
screenshots.

acpi's reporting is different than what powertop shows. I can't see much
commonality in their results.

-- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."


[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Debian bug tracking system administrator <[email protected]>. Last modified: Fri May 16 01:17:55 2025; Machine Name: bembo

Debian Bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.