Subject: debian-security-support: Please mark binary package glassfish-appserv as not
supported in squeeze
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:00:02 +0200
Package: debian-security-support
Version: 2014.09.11~deb6u1
Severity: normal
Control: block -1 by 765452
As discussed in https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts/2014/09/msg00036.html
and subsequent messages, please mark the binary package glassfish-appserv
as not security supported in Squeeze.
I'm ccing the security team to ask them if they want to same for Wheezy
(I believe it would be honest to do the same).
Cheers,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers squeeze-lts
APT policy: (500, 'squeeze-lts'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.16-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages debian-security-support depends on:
ii adduser 3.113+nmu3
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.53
ii gettext-base 0.19.2-3
debian-security-support recommends no packages.
debian-security-support suggests no packages.
-- debconf information excluded
Changed Bug title to 'debian-security-support: Please mark binary package glassfish-appserv as not supported in wheezy' from 'debian-security-support: Please mark binary package glassfish-appserv as not supported in squeeze'.
Request was from Holger Levsen <[email protected]>
to [email protected].
(Mon, 09 May 2016 09:42:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Guido Günther <[email protected]>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Christoph Biedl <[email protected]>.
(Fri, 02 Jun 2017 12:45:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Subject: Re: Bug#765454: debian-security-support: Please mark binary package
glassfish-appserv as not supported in squeeze
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 14:43:04 +0200
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:00:02AM +0200, Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
> Package: debian-security-support
> Version: 2014.09.11~deb6u1
> Severity: normal
> Control: block -1 by 765452
>
> As discussed in https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts/2014/09/msg00036.html
> and subsequent messages, please mark the binary package glassfish-appserv
> as not security supported in Squeeze.
>
> I'm ccing the security team to ask them if they want to same for Wheezy
> (I believe it would be honest to do the same).
Since the LTS team now maintains wheezy: should we just go ahead with
this?
Cheers,
-- Guido
Acknowledgement sent
to Moritz Muehlenhoff <[email protected]>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Christoph Biedl <[email protected]>.
(Fri, 02 Jun 2017 14:27:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Subject: Re: Bug#765454: debian-security-support: Please mark binary
package glassfish-appserv as not supported in squeeze
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 16:25:04 +0200
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 02:43:04PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:00:02AM +0200, Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
> > Package: debian-security-support
> > Version: 2014.09.11~deb6u1
> > Severity: normal
> > Control: block -1 by 765452
> >
> > As discussed in https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts/2014/09/msg00036.html
> > and subsequent messages, please mark the binary package glassfish-appserv
> > as not security supported in Squeeze.
> >
> > I'm ccing the security team to ask them if they want to same for Wheezy
> > (I believe it would be honest to do the same).
>
> Since the LTS team now maintains wheezy: should we just go ahead with
> this?
You still can't mark single binary packages as unsupported in
debian-security-support. If you want to add that feature, please go ahead :-)
Cheers,
Moritz
Acknowledgement sent
to Guido Günther <[email protected]>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Christoph Biedl <[email protected]>.
(Fri, 02 Jun 2017 15:24:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Subject: Re: Bug#765454: debian-security-support: Please mark binary package
glassfish-appserv as not supported in squeeze
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 17:20:45 +0200
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 04:25:04PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 02:43:04PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:00:02AM +0200, Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
> > > Package: debian-security-support
> > > Version: 2014.09.11~deb6u1
> > > Severity: normal
> > > Control: block -1 by 765452
> > >
> > > As discussed in https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts/2014/09/msg00036.html
> > > and subsequent messages, please mark the binary package glassfish-appserv
> > > as not security supported in Squeeze.
> > >
> > > I'm ccing the security team to ask them if they want to same for Wheezy
> > > (I believe it would be honest to do the same).
> >
> > Since the LTS team now maintains wheezy: should we just go ahead with
> > this?
>
> You still can't mark single binary packages as unsupported in
> debian-security-support. If you want to add that feature, please go ahead :-)
Yeah, I know (#765452) but in this case marking the whole of glassfish
as unsupported would probably be o.k.
Cheers,
-- Guido
Reply sent
to Holger Levsen <[email protected]>:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sun, 25 Nov 2018 13:51:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Notification sent
to Raphaël Hertzog <[email protected]>:
Bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sun, 25 Nov 2018 13:51:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Hi,
wheezy has reached EOL, thus closing these bug reports.
also, glassfish-appserv is gone from sid and khtml is covered like this:
security-support-limited:kde4libs khtml has no security support upstream, only for use on trusted content
--
cheers,
Holger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C
Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU General
Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained
from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.