Sure, and I'm clearly not a lawyer, but it seems difficult to say that you don't make any representations about them when you did exactly that 3 lines earlier. For example:
"This car is the best deal on the lot!"
"I have made no representation as to the value of this car."
how exactly are they at odds? The second statement pertains to services provided by developers, not the developers themselves. Just because you pass a qualification exam, no matter how serious that exam, does not mean you can provide a quality service. The second one should just be an obvious thing that our legalese culture requires. Of course google doesn't endorse someone just for passing some online test?
Followed three lines later by...
> "Google does not make any representation, endorsement or warranty regarding the services of these developers."
These statements seem at odds with each other.