Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
dragonwriter
on Oct 7, 2015
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Larry Wall Unveils Perl 6.0.0
> This correctly produced a nice tidy list of just 32 values
33, not 32, right? (2
0 through 2
32, inclusive)
kbenson
on Oct 7, 2015
[–]
Yes, 33 (although HN ate your double asterisk, like it did the original comment's initially).
# perl6 -e 'say +(1, 2, 4 ... 2**32).elems;' 33
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
33, not 32, right? (20 through 232, inclusive)