It's useful because it's a generic design pattern not because of the mathematics behind it (of which virtually nothing is actually used, at least in everyday programming).

Yeah, generic design pattern which is minimal, compact and simple.

Yeah, why would I use mathematics in programming.

> Yeah, generic design pattern which is minimal, compact and simple.

A good argument for monads. Much better than the dishonest appeal to mathematics.

I think you're reading more into spooningtamarin's posts than was actually there.

Really?

Yes, I definitely mentioned mathematicians, because they were the ones who showed us the problem solving methods, the modeling/design method.

I'm definitely agreeing that one uses practically none of the category theory in programming. But let's say that we can be influenced by the design of category theory, and get some theorems for free because of it.