Given that being aware of something is the primary intent of mindfulness, I'd say this article's author is misrepresenting what "mindfulness" actually means by using it to define something which is only orthogonally related. Technically speaking, anti-mindfulness would be defined as the intentional practice of not observing one's thought or being aware of them. The quote above seems to indicate one is aware of the process.

I live in the Bay and I have not personally observed a group or movement with the primary intent of going around trying to not be aware of what they are thinking or doing. That happens naturally enough in people with their noses in phones on the sidewalk!

Mindfulness is thus a prerequisite to wandering, and being anti mindful or revolting against mindfulness... (Who would actually do or say that?) is therefore anti wandering as well. QED.

What the article talks about is how there is a benefit both from focused thought, and involuntary thought. There has a growing trend towards trying to avoid 'wasteful' thought and on focusing attention on task, but that there's evidence and a counter trend showing that letting your mind do things without conscious direction is also beneficial.

I think it's definitely ironic that he's using the term mindfulness in the way that he does, but it's just a word. The concept that he's explaining is something that people who have actually practiced mindfulness have already learned.

Despite the fact that he's using the wrong words, I think it's a net gain for people to become more aware and comfortable with the things that our minds and bodies do without a conscious directive, and to learn to trust that they have value.

But I think the article is protecting the very stressful cycle of thinking about the same things over and over and over without being able to let go. The old

"I should go to grocery store to get food" leading to "I should cook more at home" to "That one time I tried to make tikka masala it came out bad" back to "I should go to the store"

cycle.

I'm all for the embracing of day-dreaming, but that comes from mindfulness. A calm, clear place where thoughts are free to bubble up as freely as they are able to go.

Mindfulness meditation practice is, for me, the gym. It helps me put my mind to that place, to focus and put 100% into whatever I'm doing, whether that's chopping carrots, programming, or day-dreaming.

Thankfully I have no trouble with wandering attention when dealing with a difficult task at work (although, upon success I am generally thoroughly drained. Attempting to jump into my next task can be quite a tough hurdle after spending a few hours in the zone intently focused on one particular nuance of a system.) and I produce plenty of wonderful thoughts when I'm doing menial things like dishes or riding the train without a book.

In the end, like most things, there's a bit of balance to it all.

Just pretty neat if you came up with those both on your own.

Could this be the beginning of the revolt against mindfulness?

I think the article (and probably a lot of modern mindfulness courses/books) conflates mindfulness and concentration meditation. One of the basic principles of mindfulness meditation is equanimity. In terms of 'mental objects' this means being non-judgmental towards thoughts, emotions, etc. Wandering is just one of the many things that occur and when one notices wandering, one can just observe that. If the wandering continues, it continues. If the wandering stops, it stops.

Focus can be a side-effect of mindfulness meditation, but is not the goal.

I don't think mindfulness and mind-wandering are inconsistent with one another. In fact as you pointed out, a key tenet of mindfulness is occasionally allowing our thoughts to wander, but knowing what is happening, and naming said thoughts.

In fact, mind-wandering paired with mindfulness can be very powerful. We can allow our subconscious to come out of the shadows, all the while noticing where it is going. The two don't have to be separated, they can go hand-in-hand.

Could this be the beginning of the revolt against mindfulness?

Also, proliferation of thoughts is covered in 2,600 year old teachings https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conceptual_proliferation It seems we as a species have been revolting for a while ;)

In general I taught myself to alternate periods of deep concentration work with periods of "pause" where I stop writing code and let my mind "wander" in relaxing activities. I recommend taking a step back when faced with a difficult problem to solve.

Usually when I come back to work I take the initial problem with a more creative approach.

The problem is that our world (science, media, etc.) is heavily biased towards novelty. Somehow, it is compulsory to explain everything as if it was a new discovery, a breakthrough, when it is older than walking (as we use to say in the Catalan language).

I'm tired of reading article, after article, about new old things. People using a brain scanner to "discover" thinks we all know well.

Maybe I should read just read old books and forget the media.

As the Buddha said, "there's no such thing as noble suffering".

It's possible for people to fall into this, where they exclusively focus on concentration meditation (like the breath) that leads to a kind of narrow-mindedness. It's also difficult because there are just so many books out there for people to read, that it's tough to know exactly what people are reading and suggesting to others, and some of the new-agey type literature ('think positive!') can possibly be harmful.

There are many reputable sources (historically and currently) that can say that the purpose is NOT to suppress your thoughts, even though this can be a common misconception about meditation practice.

I'm a creative person, and I've gotten some really great ideas for projects or solved some things at work by just letting my mind bounce around from idea to idea, so I'm hesitant to replace that with a still mind. Although every once in awhile I need to relax or calm down and meditation helps with that.

Every scientific theory, every invention throughout history, resulted from people "mind-wandering", imagining a reality other than the one in front of them. Mindfulness is not the only legitimate mental activity, in fact it's a fad with a name and some slogans surrounding one of many equally legitimate mental states. There's nothing wrong with it, unless people start thinking of it as the only legitimate mental activity, a human failing with a long sad history.

And like all meditation, it is, in fact, enabled by mindfulness, and has its own prehistoric origins.

But my gut reaction is it's sad that mindfulness is being demoted in order to promote wandering. It makes a good story, I guess, to have an antagonist, but in my mind there is no conflict whatsoever between mindfulness and "mind wandering". The insistence in this article that there is a conflict gives me the impression that the author doesn't truly understand the practice of mindfulness.

There must be a word for this moment, when the primary focus of attention shifts from the near physical environment to thoughts that are "mentally near". I certainly know the subjective experience of what is being described, but I lack the words to express it. It superficially resembles a context switch.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_monkey

Zen is where I encountered it.

Part of that cycle comes from stress hormones. One of the easiest ways we can motivate ourselves is to increase stress, we do that easily because one of the easy things for our conscious mind is to imagine or remember things, and if we imagine things that make us nervous, we can trigger a release of stress hormones which agitate us and push us to avoid some negative consequence.

For instance, if you have a paper to write, and you lack motivation to do it, you can imagine the result of not doing it, and that will make you anxious, and that anxiety will prompt you to seek out a way to avoid that uncomfortable feeling, which might be writing the paper to get it out of the way, or it might be flipping on the TV so you can crowd out your imagined fear of failure, and console yourself with the promise that you'll get it done later just fine if you rest.

Coffee helps you focus because it lets the stress hormones in your brain persist for longer, but it actually causes other problems. Stress-based motivation causes you to seek relief, sometimes that relief comes from tackling a problem head-on, sometimes that relief comes from avoiding the problem.

Avoiding the problem can lead to more stress (It's a lot more stressful to have a paper that you think you'll do terrible on due tomorrow than it is to have a paper you think you'll do terrible on in a week) but the thing about stress-based motivation is you have less conscious decision about what to do about it. It pushes you, you don't push it. You just help to control the amplitude.

Coffee helps maintain those stress hormones active in your brain, and that stress generally keeps you from sleeping, that's one of it's direct roles, as well as it keeps you worrying which is kind of a positive feedback loop.

First of all, this isn't necessarily a bad thing that needs to change. This is just a thing. But it's good to know how to change it. The first thing you would do is drop the Coffee altogether. Coffee's going to amplify this effect, and it's going to keep you awake at night. Proper sleep will help you relieve stress, and it will help you recover some of the more pleasant feeling interest-based motivation.

The next helpful thing would be to start doing some kind of mindfulness training. I like zazen, particularly just sitting. Essentially sitting in a calm place, and letting thoughts come to your mind, but not acknowledging them, more like watching them come and go. If you find yourself thinking about one of those thoughts, that's OK, start watching THAT thought come and go. The same with sensations or anything else. If you feel tired, you feel tired. If you feel hungry, you feel hungry.

If you do this for 15 minutes, it can feel like a very long time, and you will walk away a bit more objective. I like to conclude with a bit more mindfulness where I sort of take stock of my self. I focus on feeling everything across my body in discrete steps, each finger, my palm, my wrist, my forearm, my elbow, etc. Do I feel pain? Do I feel hungry? Do I feel tired? Then I end this step by thinking about what I might need to do to change these things, if I make myself more comfortable, or eat, or rest, will these things be less distracting?

You might find that you are doing too many things, and that's where this stress is coming from. You can go a for a long while with 10 things to do every day and no means to complete more than 8 of them. This is easy to do if you don't ever count them and get by through telling yourself that you can do all 10 if you just put your mind to it, and get frustrated when you fail.

But in slowing down, you might realize that everyone does this, and that while you can do 8 things better by putting 8 things on your plate rather than do 8 things poorly by putting 10 things on your plate, there's a cultural expectation that you have 10 things on your plate and be exasperated about it, and it's easy to fall into a trap where you're now getting stress from the knowledge that you would really like to have to do 8 things, but you need to do 10, added to the rest of the other stressful feelings you get from having to try to do 10.

Similarly everyone's mind is different, and we all learn to adapt to a different mental landscape. Some people, like people with ADHD, have minds built such that they blow through all of their interest-based focus very quickly. Then their mind wanders easily, and they might turn to stress-based motivation to get through the rest of the day. If you are like this you might be able to avoid the overthinking and the self-medication with coffee, but realize that you need to have a 3 hour work-day in order to not fall into that pattern, which is unreasonable. Or you might be prescribed medication which has it's own sets of upsides and downsides.

My only answer is, you can't really tell your mind to shut up. You're not really the boss of your mind, your conscious thought is just a part of your mind. You can learn about what's going on inside your mind, and you can even put yourself into a situation where you mind can become quiet. But you can't strongarm your whole mind into acting precisely the way your consciousness wants it to act indefinitely. It's much better to just learn how different parts of your mind work, and work to support them. Stress can be great, it's entirely necessary, it's not something you want to cut out of your brain. But it's suited to dealing with crises, and if you can arrange your circumstance so that you aren't using stress to be the motivation through your every day, you might be better off.