Thanks for suggesting this, that part was not clear to me at all.
That said, if you have to sign your entire net worth over to the collective for the time that you are in, maybe it's still "your capital" on the year-to-year timescale, but it's socialism on the day-to-day scale.
And I would also suggest that there is still room for coercion even if you are allowed to liquidate your holding. I was heartened to see that the option to leave is a feature. But that's a value that they would have to hold throughout every design decision for the community and the contract. It's one thing to say "people should be able to leave", it's another to repeatedly sacrifice other design goals to make it easy to do so. Where there is friction, it can add up to coercion.